A Thesis submitted to The University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Medicine. / Extreme controversy surrounds the uncertainty of pelvic mesh and sling devices to essentially cure patients of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). A relatively new product that has taken the market by storm is the tension free Vaginal Tape‐ Obturator (TVT‐O) mesh by Ethicon, Gynecare. It has obtained Center for Disease Control approval and labeled a “clinically proven, safe product with a 90% cure rate for urinary incontinence,” according to the manufactures website (Ethicon, Gynecare)4, 8. One side effect that is known about this particular device is its ability to leave patients post surgery with unbearable, chronic pelvic pain2. Although the mesh is needed to prevent urinary incontinence, it is pivotal that the quality of life of our patients does not suffer appreciably with elective, non‐life threatening procedures. Another common mesh product is the pelvic sling by Monarc. One‐study reports more than 95 percent of patients who underwent elective surgery with the insertion of Monarc sling achieved complete dryness and did not require the use of pads following the procedure22. These are successful outcomes, but what occurs with the minority of patients that have unfavorable outcomes such as chronic pain12, 15, 16? A retrospective study was completed to deduce the onset of pain and severity of pain caused by the TVT‐O mesh and Monarc mesh‐utilizing data from Dr. Hibner’s patients. There were 19 chronic pelvic pain patients with an average age of 50, standard deviation of 11 years, seen by Dr. Hibner and his colleagues. These patients completed the International Pelvic Pain assessment form upon their first visit to the office and SF‐36 scores of physical and mental scores were obtained. Results found physical scores of 29.5 and mental scores of 36 in pelvic pain patients, which were higher than certain other chronic, medical diseases1. We were able to conclude that patients with pelvic pain from mesh have lower physical and mental SF‐36 scores than patients with other chronic diseases representing a decreased quality of life overall.