Paper industry in Taiwan is mainly focused on domestic demand. Its production and sales not only are related to economic growth but also serve as an index of a nation¡¦s economic situation. Due to the business model of this industry, production line workers compose the majority of employees of the enterprise. So production supervisors play a very important role in the effectiveness of first-line worker management and improvement of operation procedures. Therefore, production supervisors in Taiwan paper industry are focused as the subject of this research. The purpose of this study is to propose, by applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), an approach to construct Performance Evaluation Indicators and weights. Specific suggestions for the construction and modification of Performance Appraisal system for paper industry in Taiwan will also be made. The research method includes literature review and references made to industrial practice, by which performance appraisal criteria for production supervisors were drafted. Further, expert survey on the evaluation system in use was carried out among members of Taiwan Paper Industry Association. Based on the data gathered from the questionnaire survey, analysis of importance and the AHP approach were applied to construct the structure and weights of the Performance Appraisal Criteria for production supervisors. Also, validation was made in a manufacture of the paper industry. Empirical examination supports the practicality and fitness of the structure of this Performance Evaluation System. Finally, analysis results were concluded into suggestions for administrative practice and future studies. Findings of this research are as follows: I. Performance Appraisal Criteria and weights The Performance Appraisal Criteria includes the following three constructs: 1. Work achievement (Weight : 0.4092) ; 2. Professional capacity (Weight : 0.3383); 3. Work behavior and attitude (Weight : 0.2525). II. Secondary Performance Appraisal Criteria and weights 1. ¡§Work achievement¡¨ construct includes the following 6 items: (1) Occupational safety (Weight: 0.1598); (2) Product quality (Weight: 0.0739); (3) Cost control (Weight: 0.0536); (4) Discipline (Weight: 0.0409); (5) Production capacity (Weight: 0.0408); (6) Equipment utilization efficiency (Weight: 0.0400). ¡@2. ¡§Professional capacity¡¨ construct includes 6 items: (1) Executive skills (Weight : 0.0549); (2) Leadership (Weight : 0.0512); (3) Resourcefulness (Weight : 0.0423); (4) Professional knowledge and skills (Weight : 0.0404); (5) Interpersonal relationship skills (Weight : 0.0323); (6) Strategy-making (Weight : 0.0314). ¡@3. ¡§Work behavior and attitude¡¨ construct has 7 sub-items: (1) Teamwork and cooperation (Weight 0.0676); (2) Integrity (Weight 0.0577); (3) Responsibility (Weight 0.0545); (4) Proactivity (Weight 0.0439); (5) Cost-consciousness (Weight 0.0434); (6) Professional attitude (Weight 0.0403); (7) Self-control (Weight 0.0309).

The purpose of this study is using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to inspect the evaluative criteria of performance and weighted model that are suit for nurse anesthetists. AHP not only can provide the supervisor a more effective, justifiable, and objective method in evaluation but also can indicate the personal achievement and development to nurse anesthetists themselves. To reinforce the employees¡¦ core abilities and assist the management of organization, AHP is anticipated to substitute for the traditional subjective impression-based evaluative method. The research method includes consulting the references and industrial practices, by which performance appraisal criteria for nurse anesthetists were drafted. Furthermore, expert survey on the evaluation system in use was carried out among managers of the department of anesthesiology of 17 medical centers. Based on the data gathered from the questionnaire survey, analysis of importance and the AHP approach were applied to construct the structure and weights of the Performance Appraisal Criteria for nurse anesthetists. Also, verification was made in the department of anesthesiology of a chosen medical center. The result of empirical examination supports the practicality and fitness of the structure of this Performance Evaluation System. Findings of this research are as follows: I. Performance Appraisal constructs and weights The Performance Appraisal Criteria includes the following three constructs: 1. Work achievement (Weight: 0.352) ; 2. Professional capacity and character (Weight: 0.246); 3. Work behavior and attitude (Weight: 0.402). II. Performance Appraisal Criteria and weights 1. ¡§Work achievement¡¨ construct includes the following seven items: (1) Crisis management (Weight: 0.085); (2) Particular contribution (Weight: 0.018); (3) Time arrangement (Weight: 0.0402); (4) Work efficiency (Weight: 0.056); (5) Maintenance of equipment (Weight: 0.046); (6) Cost control (Weight: 0.035);¡]7¡^Work quality (Weight: 0.069) 2. ¡§Professional capacity and character¡¨ construct includes five items: (1) Professional knowledge and skills (Weight: 0.029); (2) Executive skills (Weight: 0.043); (3) Responsive ability (Weight: 0.082); (4) Judgment (Weight: 0.064); (5) Confidence (Weight: 0.028). 3. ¡§Work behavior and attitude¡¨ construct has seven items: (1) Responsibility (Weight 0.061); (2) Devotion (Weight 0.047); (3) Teamwork and cooperation (Weight 0.042); (4) Attendance and Diligence (Weight 0.025); (5) Proactively (Weight 0.072); (6) Co-operation (Weight 0.084); (7) Pressure management (Weight 0.070).