Spelling suggestions: "subject:"personalized document clustering"" "subject:"ersonalized document clustering""
1 |
An Ontology-Based Personalized Document Clustering ApproachHuang, Tse-hsiu 05 August 2004 (has links)
With the proliferation of electronic commerce and knowledge economy environments, both persons and organizations increasingly have generated and consumed large amounts of online information, typically available as textual documents. To manage this rapid growth of the number of textual documents, people often use categories or folders to organize their documents. These document grouping behaviors are intentional acts that reflect the persons¡¦ (or organizations¡¦) preferences with regard to semantic coherency, or relevant groupings between subjects. For this thesis, we design and implement an ontology-based personalized document clustering (OnPEC) technique by incorporating both an individual user¡¦s partial clustering and an ontology into the document clustering process. Our use of a target user¡¦s partial clustering supports the personalization of document categorization, whereas our use of the ontology turns document clustering from a feature-based to a concept-based approach. In addition, we combine two hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) approaches (i.e., pre-cluster-based and atomic-based) in our proposed OnPEC technique. Using the clustering effectiveness achieved by a traditional content-based document clustering technique and previously proposed feature-based document clustering (PEC) techniques as performance benchmarks, we find that use of partial clusters improves document clustering effectiveness, as measured by cluster precision and cluster recall. Moreover, for both OnPEC and PEC techniques, the clustering effectiveness of pre-cluster-based HAC methods greatly outperforms that of atomic-based HAC methods.
|
2 |
Development of Personalized Document Clustering Technique for Accommodating Hierarchical Categorization PreferencesLee, Kuan-yi 27 July 2006 (has links)
With the advances in information and networking technologies and the proliferation of e-commerce and knowledge management applications, individuals and organizations generate and acquire tremendous amount of online information that is typically available as textual documents. To manage the ever-increasing volume of documents, an individual or organization frequently organizes his/her documents into a set or hierarchy of categories in order to facilitate document management and subsequent information access and browsing. Furthermore, document clustering is an intentional act that reflects individual preferences with regard to the semantic coherency and relevant categorization of documents. Hence, effective document-clustering must consider individual preferences for supporting personalization in document categorization and should be capable of organizing documents into a category hierarchy. However, document-clustering research traditionally has been anchored in analyses of document content. As a consequence, most of existing document-clustering techniques are not tailored to individuals¡¦ preferences and therefore are unable to facilitate personalization. On the other hand, existing document-clustering techniques generally are designed to generate from a document collection a set of document clusters rather than a hierarchy of document clusters. In response, we develop in this study a hierarchical personalized document-clustering (HPEC) technique that takes into account an individual¡¦s folder hierarchy representing the individual¡¦s categorization preferences and produces document-clusters in a hierarchical structure for the target individual. Our empirical evaluation results suggest that the proposed HPEC technique outperformed its benchmark technique (i.e., HAC+P) in cluster recall while maintaining the same level of cluster precision and location discrepancy as its benchmark technique did.
|
3 |
Preference-Anchored Document Clustering Technique: Effects of Term Relationships and ThesaurusLin, Hao-hsiang 30 August 2006 (has links)
According to the context theory of classification, the document-clustering behaviors of individuals not only involve the attributes (including contents) of documents but also depend on who is doing the task and in what context. Thus, effective document-clustering techniques need to be able to take into account users¡¦ categorization preferences and thus can generate document clusters from different preferential perspectives. The Preference-Anchored Document Clustering (PAC) technique was proposed for supporting preference-based document-clustering. Specifically, PAC takes a user¡¦s categorization preference into consideration and subsequently generates a set of document clusters from this specific preferential perspective. In this study, we attempt to investigate two research questions concerning the PAC technique. The first research question investigates ¡§whether the incorporation of the broader-term expansion (i.e., the proposed PAC2 technique in this study) will improve the effectiveness of preference-based document-clustering, whereas the second research question is ¡§whether the use of a statistical-based thesaurus constructed from a larger document corpus will improve the effectiveness of preference-based document-clustering.¡¨ Compared with the effectiveness achieved by PAC, our empirical results show that the proposed PAC2 technique neither improves nor deteriorates the effectiveness of preference-based document-clustering when the complete set of anchoring terms is used. However, when only a partial set of anchoring terms is provided, PAC2 cannot improve and even deteriorate the effectiveness of preference-based document-clustering. As to the second research question, our empirical results suggest the use of a statistical-based thesaurus constructed from a larger document corpus (i.e., the ACM corpus consisting of 14,729 documents) does not improve the effectiveness of PAC and PAC2 for preference-based document-clustering.
|
4 |
Personalized and Context-aware Document ClusteringYang, Chin-Sheng 15 July 2007 (has links)
To manage the ever-increasing volume of documents, organizations and individuals typically organize documents into categories (or category hierarchies) to facilitate their document management and support subsequent document retrieval and access. Document clustering is an intentional act that should reflect individuals¡¦ preferences with regard to the semantic coherency or relevant categorization of documents and should conform to the context of a target task under investigation. Thus, effective document clustering techniques need to take into account a user¡¦s categorization context defined by or relevant to the target task under consideration. However, existing document clustering techniques generally anchor in pure content-based analysis and therefore are not able to facilitate personalized or context-aware document clustering. In response, we design, implement and empirically evaluate three document clustering techniques capable of facilitating personalized or contextual document clustering. First, we extend an existing document clustering technique (specifically, the partial-clustering-based personalized document-clustering (PEC) approach) and propose the Collaborative Filtering¡Vbased personalized document-Clustering (CFC) technique to overcome the problem of small-sized partial clustering encountered by the PEC technique. Particularly, the CFC technique expands the size of a user¡¦s partial clustering based on the partial clusterings of other users with similar categorization preferences. Second, to support contextual document clustering, we design and implement a Context-Aware document-Clustering (CAC) technique by taking into consideration a user¡¦s categorization preference (i.e., a set of anchoring terms) relevant to the context of a target task and a statistical-based thesaurus constructed from the World Wide Web (WWW) via a search engine. Third, in response to the problem of small-sized set of anchoring terms which can greatly degrade the effectiveness of the CAC technique, we extend CAC and propose a Collaborative Filtering-based Context-Aware document Clustering (CF-CAC) technique. Our empirical evaluation results suggest that our proposed CFC, CAC, and CF-CAC techniques better support the need of personalized and contextual document clustering than do their benchmark techniques.
|
5 |
Personalized Document Clustering: Technique Development and Empirical EvaluationWu, Chia-Chen 14 August 2003 (has links)
With the proliferation of an electronic commerce and knowledge economy environment, both organizations and individuals generate and consume a large amount of online information, typically available as textual documents. To manage the ever-increasing volume of documents, organizations and individuals typically organize their documents into categories to facilitate document management and subsequent information access and browsing. However, document grouping behaviors are intentional acts, reflecting individuals¡¦ (or organizations¡¦) preferential perspective on semantic coherency or relevant groupings between subjects. Thus, an effective document clustering needs to address the described preferential perspective on document grouping and support personalized document clustering. In this thesis, we designed and implemented a personalized document clustering approach by incorporating individual¡¦s partial clustering into the document clustering process. Combining two document representation methods (i.e., feature refinement and feature weighting) with two clustering processes (i.e., pre-cluster-based and atomic-based), four personalized document clustering techniques are proposed. Using the clustering effectiveness achieved by a traditional content-based document clustering technique as performance benchmarks, our evaluation results suggest that use of partial clusters would improve the document clustering effectiveness. Moreover, the pre-cluster-based technique outperforms the atomic-based one, and the feature weighting method for document representation achieves a higher clustering effectiveness than the feature refinement method does.
|
Page generated in 0.1524 seconds