Damage to the nervous system may cause sensorimotor impairment, often resulting in chronic neuropathic pain. Phantom limb pain affects multiple amputees and the treatment options are limited. A promising treatment option to reduce chronic pain is by training sensory discrimination. At the Center for Bionics and Pain Research, a sensory training device has been developed. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a technique to stimulate different regions of the cerebral cortex. In studies, anodal tDCS of the sensorimotor cortex has shown to improve tactile acuity. Until now, the effect of the sensory discrimination training, performed with the sensory training device, in combination with tDCS has not been tested. The purpose of this master’s thesis was to determine the effect of tDCS applied on the sensorimotor cortex on the outcomes of sensory discrimination training. The purpose was also to compare the effect of two different methods of stimulation, namely conventional and High Definition tDCS. 16 able-bodied participants underwent three single sessions with 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training: one session combined with conventional tDCS, one session combined with High Definition tDCS and one session without tDCS. The tactile acuity was determined by the two-point discrimination test and the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, prior to and one hour after each session. This study showed that 40 minutes of sensory discrimination training was sufficient to improve the two-point discrimination in the sensory trained areas, compared to the sensory untrained areas (p=0.02). However, the improvement in two-point discrimination was not statistically significant between the interventions, i.e. the improvement in two-point discrimination for the sessions with brain modulation was not statistically significant compared to the session without brain modulation. The monofilament assessments showed an improvement in monofilament score for the sensory untrained skin patches (p=0.053). This study concluded that single sessions of training was enough to improve two-point discrimination but not monofilament score at the site of stimulation. This study lays a foundation for what parameters to include in future studies.

Phantom limb pain may occur after the accidental removal or surgical amputation of a limb. Phantom limb pain is the experience of pain in the limb that is no longer present. The clinical management of phantom limb pain is essential in the overall reduction of patient rehabilitation and poor patient outcomes. A patient’s degree of phantom limb pain is influenced by their personal response to loss and pain and can have devastating effects to a person’s social performance, occupational role, family role, relationships, and involvement in activities or hobbies. Like most chronic pain, phantom limb pain decreases the quality of life. Not all amputees who suffer from chronic pain respond to traditional therapies. The purpose of this integrated review of the literature was to explore current research and determine the efficacy of mirror therapy in the treatment of Phantom limb pain in amputees. A database search of CINAHL, PubMed (MEDLINE), and OneSearch was conducted. Mirror therapy had no reported side effects, was inexpensive, and was capable of being practiced at home and at the bedside. Relevant findings in the literature revealed a significant decrease in phantom limb pain when using mirror therapy for more than 4 weeks. Although limited research on the use of mirror therapy as an intervention for amputees, existing research supports the efficacy of mirror therapy for the management of phantom limb pain. Nurses and healthcare providers need education on mirror therapy to advocate for their patients to ensure the best possible outcome and reduction of phantom limb pain. Further research on mirror therapy is needed.