Yes / In vivo tests for male reproductive genotoxicity are time consuming, resource-intensive and their use should be minimised according to the principles of the 3Rs. Accordingly, we investigated the effects in vitro, of a variety of known, phase-specific germ cell mutagens, i.e. pre-meiotic, meiotic, and post-meiotic genotoxins, on rat spermatogenic cell types separated using Staput unit-gravity velocity sedimentation, evaluating DNA damage using the Comet assay. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU), N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) (spermatogenic phase), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and 5-bromo-2'-deoxy-uridine (5-BrdU) (meiotic phase), methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) and ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) (post-meiotic phase) were selected for use as they are potent male rodent, germ cell mutagens in vivo. DNA damage was detected directly using the Comet assay and indirectly using the TUNEL assay. Treatment of the isolated cells with ENU and MNU produced the greatest concentration-related increase in DNA damage in spermatogonia. Spermatocytes were most sensitive to 6-MP and 5-BrdU while spermatids were particularly susceptible to MMS and EMS. Increases were found when measuring both Olive tail moment (OTM) and % tail DNA, but the greatest changes were in OTM. Parallel results were found with the TUNEL assay, which showed highly significant, concentration dependent effects of all these genotoxins on spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids in the same way as for DNA damage. The specific effects of these chemicals on different germ cell types matches those produced in vivo. This approach therefore shows potential for use in the detection of male germ cell genotoxicity and could contribute to the reduction of the use of animals in such toxicity assays.

No / Male germ stem cells are responsible for transmission of genetic information to the next generation. Some chemicals exert a negative impact on male germ cells, either directly, or indirectly affecting them through their action on somatic cells. Ultimately, these effects might inhibit fertility, and may exhibit negative consequences on future offspring. Genotoxic anticancer agents may interact with DNA in germ cells potentially leading to a heritable germline mutation. Experimental information in support of this theory has not always been reproducible and suitable in vivo studies remain limited. Thus, alternative male germ cell tests, which are now able to detect phase specificity of such agents, might be used by regulatory agencies to help evaluate the potential risk of mutation. However, there is an urgent need for such approaches for identification of male reproductive genotoxins since this area has until recently been dependent on in vivo studies. Many factors drive alternative approaches, including the (1) commitment to the principles of the 3R's (Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement), (2) time-consuming nature and high cost of animal experiments, and (3) new opportunities presented by new molecular analytical assays. There is as yet currently no apparent appropriate model of full mammalian spermatogenesis in vitro, under the REACH initiative, where new tests introduced to assess genotoxicity and mutagenicity need to avoid unnecessary testing on animals. Accordingly, a battery of tests used in conjunction with the high throughput STAPUT gravity sedimentation was recently developed for purification of male germ cells to investigate genotoxicity for phase specificity in germ cells. This system might be valuable for the examination of phases previously only available in mammals with large-scale studies of germ cell genotoxicity in vivo. The aim of this review was to focus on this alternative approach and its applications as well as on chemicals of known in vivo phase specificities used during this test system development. / Natural Science Fund of Shandong Province, China (No. ZR2012DM014) and the People’s Livelihoods Science and Technology Project of Qingdao, Shandong Province, China (13-1-3-73-nsh).

No / Genotoxic agents can interact with DNA in germ cells possibly resulting in a heritable trait (germline mutation). Thus, in vitro male germ cell tests, which can detect phase specificity of such agents, could be used by regulatory agencies to help evaluate the potential risk of mutation. The male germ cell system now has a well-established model for studying phase specificity using the STA-PUT velocity sedimentation. On treatment with genotoxic agents, differences in chemical structure and metabolic differences in types of male germ cell lead to differing susceptibilities to genotoxicity, so careful investigation is required for phase specificity. This can yield valuable information about the potential mechanisms involved in the genotoxicity responses and thus increase the significance of the findings. This is especially important because mutations induced in the germline could also affect future generations. In this chapter, we briefly review the field of the male germ cell DNA damage response.

Durch ihren Einfluß auf die Genexpression reguliert die zirkadiane Uhr physiologische Funktionen vieler Organe. Obwohl der zugrundeliegende allgemeine Uhrmechanismus gut untersucht ist, bestehen noch viele Unklarheiten über die gewebespezifische Regulation zirkadianer Gene. Neben ihrer gemeinsamen 24-h-Periode im Expressionsmuster unterscheiden diese sich darin, zu welcher Tageszeit sie am höchsten exprimiert sind und in welchem Gewebe sie oszillieren. Mittels Überrepräsentationsanalyse lassen sich Bindungsstellen von Transkriptionsfaktoren identifizieren, die an der Regulation ähnlich exprimierter Gene beteiligt sind. Um diese Methode auf zirkadiane Gene anzuwenden, ist es nötig, Untergruppen ähnlich exprimierter Gene genau zu definieren und Vergleichsgene passend auszuwählen. Eine hierarchische Methode zur Kontrolle der FDR hilft, aus der daraus entstehenden Menge vieler Untergruppenvergleiche signifikante Ergebnisse zu filtern. Basierend auf mit Microarrays gemessenen Zeitreihen wurde durch Promotoranalyse die gewebespezifische Regulation von zirkadianen Genen zweier Zelltypen in Mäusen untersucht. Bindungsstellen der Transkriptionsfaktoren CLOCK:BMAL1, NF-Y und CREB fanden sich in beiden überrepräsentiert. Diesen verwandte Transkriptionsfaktoren mit spezifischen Komplexierungsdomänen binden mit unterschiedlicher Stärke an Motivvarianten und arrangieren dabei Interaktionen mit gewebespezifischeren Regulatoren (z.B. HOX, GATA, FORKHEAD, REL, IRF, ETS Regulatoren und nukleare Rezeptoren). Vermutlich beeinflußt dies den Zeitablauf der Komplexbildung am Promotor zum Transkriptionsstart und daher auch gewebespezifische Transkriptionsmuster. In dieser Hinsicht sind der Gehalt an Guanin (G) und Cytosin (C) sowie deren CpG-Dinukleotiden wichtige Promotoreigenschaften, welche die Interaktionswahrscheinlichkeit von Transkriptionsfaktoren steuern. Grund ist, daß die Affinitäten, mit denen Regulatoren zu Promotoren hingezogen werden, von diesen Sequenzeigenschaften abhängen. / A circadian clock in peripheral tissues regulates physiological functions through gene expression timing. However, despite the common and well studied core clock mechanism, understanding of tissue-specific regulation of circadian genes is marginal. Overrepresentation analysis is a tool to detect transcription factor binding sites that might play a role in the regulation of co-expressed genes. To apply it to circadian genes that do share a period of about 24 hours, but differ otherwise in peak phase timing and tissue-specificity of their oscillation, clear definition of co-expressed gene subgroups as well as the appropriate choice of background genes are important prerequisites. In this setting of multiple subgroup comparisons, a hierarchical method for false discovery control reveals significant findings. Based on two microarray time series in mouse macrophages and liver cells, tissue-specific regulation of circadian genes in these cell types is investigated by promoter analysis. Binding sites for CLOCK:BMAL1, NF-Y and CREB transcription factors are among the common top candidates of overrepresented motifs. Related transcription factors of BHLH and BZIP families with specific complexation domains bind to motif variants with differing strengths, thereby arranging interactions with more tissue-specific regulators (e.g. HOX, GATA, FORKHEAD, REL, IRF, ETS regulators and nuclear receptors). Presumably, this influences the timing of pre-initiation complexes and hence tissue-specific transcription patterns. In this respect, the content of guanine (G) and cytosine (C) bases as well as CpG dinucleotides are important promoter properties directing the interaction probability of regulators, because affinities with which transcription factors are attracted to promoters depend on these sequence characteristics.