Magistriniame darbe analizuojama nusikaltimų valstybės tarnybai esmė, piktnaudžiavimo sudėtis (BK 228 straipsnis) plačiąją prasme: subjektas, subjektyvieji požymiai, objektas, objektyvieji požymiai, sankcija, didelė žala kaip piktnaudžiavimo sudėties padarinys, jos nustatymo aspektai, nusikaltimo padarymo motyvas Pasiremiant įvairių autorių nuomone, tiek ir Lietuvos teismų praktika, užsienio šalių pareiginių nusikaltimų analize darbe yra analizuojamas piktnaudžiavimo nusikaltimo bei kitų teisės pažeidimų, susijusių su piktnaudžiavimu tarnybine padėtimi ar įgaliojimų viršijimu, santykis, jų kaip dviejų atskirų nusikalstamų veikų vertinimas. Atliekant nuosprendžių analize piktnaudžiavimas analizuojamas kaip teisminės praktikos reiškinys. Siekiama atskleisti pareiginių nusikaltimų ir pažeidimų skirtumus. Analizės atlikimui pasirinktas istorinis ir lyginamasis metodais. Pasinaudojant istoriniu metodu atlikta istorinė apžvalga. Lyginamasis metodas buvo panaudotas lyginant įvairių šalių nusikaltimus valstybės tarnybai. Analizuojant remtasi teismų nuosprendžiais, moksliniais darbais, įvairiais straipsniais, baudžiamosios teisės literatūra. / In final paper analyzes the public servic nature of crime and the abuse of the composition (CC-228) in the wider sense: subject, subjective attributes, object atributes, objective cvidence signs, the penalty, significant harm as a consequence of the abuse ended, they were determinedaspects of the crime committed by reason of the choice of different authors, both and Lithuanian judicial practice, foreign official crime anglysis work is analyzed, abuse and other criminal offenses relating to abuse of authority or misuse of power, a ratio of two different assessment of offenses. The anglysis of the criminal misuse of the anglysis of case law phenomenon. The ai mis to reveal the official primes and violations of the differences. The analytical performance of selected historical and comparative methods. Trought a historical overview of the historical approach taken. The comparative method was used for comparing different countries, crimes against the public service. The analysis was based on judicial decisions, academic writings, various articles, criminal law literature.

The master paper discusses the issue of the matter of crime in cases against civil service and public interests. Criminal acts against civil service and public interests are considered to be selfish acts. In fact, the matter of crimes against civil service and public interests is an obtained or provided benefit of particular form. Master paper tries to present the matter of bribery crimes (Articles 225 – 227 of Criminal Code), attributes of the matter of abusing service for the purpose of obtaining material or other benefit (Article 228 Paragraph 2 of Criminal Code.), their general characteristics and differences, contents and effect on qualification of criminal acts. After the Republic of Lithuania regained its independence which had influence on the essential changes in economy-social relations and corresponding legislative acts, property and personal relations among people had become significantly more modern and varied. In addition, a wider range of benefit forms which could be obtained or provided in relation with position of a civil officer appeared and thus respective evaluation had to be made in respect of the matter of criminal acts specified in Part XXXIII of the Criminal Code. The author expresses reasoned opinion based on theoretical knowledge and concepts on the issue discussed. The master paper also includes the analysis of criminal proceedings, corresponding judgements and courts’ positions on the issue of the matter of crime. The author presents the... [to full text]