abstract / Politics and Public Administration / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

At the beginning of the ritual dispute, the position of the Grand Secretarial headed by Grand Secretary Yang Tinghe (1459-1429) was widely supported by the court officials. The reason was that its suggestion of unifying dynastic succession and imperial adoption for Shizong, making him the "son" of the late Emperor Xiaozong (1470-1505). Made perfect reuse to them, that position was strengthened by the reforms introduced by the Enthronement Decree, which was drafted by Yang Tinghe. / However, Shizong increasingly attempted to prevail with his personal will at the expanding of dynastic laws and rituals. His decreased father, the Prince of Xing, was titled "Sovereign Father by Birth" on the recommendations of the Grand Secretariat. In the third year of Jiajing (1524), supported by several junior officials, he wanted to get rid of the term "By birth" in his father's title and address Xiaozong, his adopted father, as "Sovereign Uncle". Two hundred and thirty odd officials gathered and cried at the Zuoshun Gate to protest. Shizong ordered them beaten and imprisoned. / Obviously, the "Great Ritual Controversy" was a great tragedy. It was so not only that protesting officials suffered physically and politically in the aftermath. The more far-reaching historical significance is that it brought about a change of political ethics of great consequences. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) / The "Great Ritual Controversy" (Daliyi) began soon after Emperor Shizong (1507-1566, reigned 1521-1566) succeeded the throne of his cousin, the Wuzong Emperor (1491-1521). The crux of the dispute was Shizong's insistence on paying his deceased father, who never reigned, ever increasing ritual homage. / The replacement of senior court officials caused a change to the political alignment of the court. The status of the grand secretariat and the ministries were badly affected. Court officials in general were no longer cooperating nor unified under the laws or conventional practice. The grand secretaries more and more became the Emperor's personal secretaries, while gaining more power. / This dissertation studies the performance of these officials during and after the dispute to provide better knowledge of this historical episode. It also intends to throw light on the moral spirit of the scholar-officials in the middle Ming. / 胡吉勛. / 論文(哲學博士)--香港中文大學, 2005. / 參考文獻(p. 567-586). / Adviser: Hung-lam Chu. / Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: A, page: 0297. / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. [Ann Arbor, MI] : ProQuest Information and Learning, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Abstracts also in English. / School code: 1307. / Lun wen (Zhe xue bo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2005. / Can kao wen xian (p. 567-586). / Hu Jixun.

馬增榮. / "2007年8月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2007. / 參考文獻(leaves 111-120). / "2007 nian 8 yue". / Abstract also in English. / Ma Zengrong. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2007. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 111-120). / 前言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一章、 --- 硏究回顧及背景述論 --- p.6 / Chapter 一、 --- 先秦至兩漢時期 --- p.6 / Chapter 二、 --- 魏晉時期 --- p.11 / Chapter 三、 --- 南朝時期 --- p.15 / Chapter 四、 --- 忠、孝關係 --- p.19 / Chapter 第二章、 --- 仕宦者的「殉國之感」和環繞易代的譏刺言論 --- p.24 / Chapter 一、 --- 仕宦者的「殉國之感」 --- p.24 / Chapter 二、 --- 譏刺言論和被譏者的反應 --- p.36 / Chapter 第三章、 --- 何謂「忠臣」？史論中的「忠臣」 --- p.48 / Chapter 一、 --- 政權的正當性和史論中的「忠臣」 --- p.48 / Chapter 二、 --- 「世蹈忠義」的陳郡袁氏與時人眼中的「忠臣」 --- p.64 / Chapter 第四章、 --- 國與家中的仕宦者與皇子宗室 --- p.73 / Chapter 一、 --- 仕宦者在殉國與保家之間的抉擇 --- p.73 / Chapter 二、 --- 從梁元帝的《忠臣傳》看南朝皇子宗室與君主的關係 --- p.87 / 結論 --- p.106 / 參考書目 --- p.111

施卓凌. / "2008年8月". / "2008 nian 8 yue". / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (leave 307-323) / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Shi Zhuoling. / Chapter 第一章、 --- 問題的提出 --- p.1 / Chapter 一、 --- 命題界定 --- p.1 / Chapter 1. --- 地方精英的涵義 --- p.1 / Chapter 2. --- 并州和河東郡 --- p.28 / Chapter 二、 --- 前人研究回顧 --- p.33 / Chapter 第二章、 --- 仕途的開放與并州地方精英 --- p.44 / Chapter 一、 --- 官秩等級對精英行為的規範 --- p.44 / Chapter 1. --- 官制與爵制 --- p.44 / Chapter 2. --- 官秩和爵秩為綱的秩序 --- p.56 / Chapter 二、 --- 并州地方精英的入仕情況 --- p.74 / Chapter 1. --- 核心區：河東郡和太原郡 --- p.75 / Chapter 2. --- 中間區：上黨、上郡、西河和北地郡 --- p.81 / Chapter 3. --- 邊緣區(1):雲中、鴈門和代郡 --- p.84 / Chapter 4. --- 邊陲區(2):定襄、五原和朔方 --- p.89 / Chapter 第三章、 --- 并州政治精英的個案硏究 --- p.93 / Chapter 一、 --- 河東裴氏 --- p.93 / Chapter 二、 --- 上郡鮮于氏 --- p.100 / Chapter 三、 --- 上黨馮氏 --- p.105 / Chapter 四、 --- 和林格爾墓主 --- p.117 / Chapter 五、 --- 樓煩班氏 --- p.122 / Chapter 第四章、 --- 并州精英：富商與豪傑 --- p.131 / Chapter 一、 --- 富商 --- p.131 / Chapter 二、 --- 豪傑 --- p.169 / Chapter 第五章、 --- 并州地方叛亂與地方精英 --- p.187 / 總結 --- p.212 / 附錄 --- p.222 / 附錄1〈前四史所見賜吏爵表〉 --- p.222 / 附錄2〈張家山漢簡中的名田制及繼承法表〉 --- p.224 / 附錄3〈并州和河東郡官員籍貫統計〉 --- p.225 / Chapter 3.1 --- 〈并州和河東郡官員籍貫表〉 --- p.229 / Chapter 3.2 --- 〈西漢六百石或以上官員統計圖〉 --- p.254 / Chapter 3.3 --- 〈東漢六百石或以上官員統計圖〉 --- p.255 / Chapter 3.4 --- 〈兩漢六百石或以上官員比較統計圖〉 --- p.256 / Chapter 3.5 --- 〈兩漢六百石或以上官員統計圖〉 --- p.257 / Chapter 3.6 --- 〈兩漢二千石或以上官員統計圖〉 --- p.258 / Chapter 3.7 --- 〈并州二百石或以上官員分佈圖〉 --- p.259 / 附錄4〈考衛尉貞侯殘石碑陰〉 --- p.260 / Chapter 4.1 --- 〈考衛尉貞侯殘石碑陰初步釋文〉 --- p.261 / 附錄5〈山西夏縣王村東漢壁畫(部分)〉 --- p.262 / 附錄6〈漢代并州和河東郡交通考〉 --- p.266 / 附錄7〈兩漢并州和河東郡外族入侵年表〉 --- p.298 / 參考書目 --- p.307

University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities / Department of Government and Public Administration

University of Macau / Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities / Department of Government and Public Administration