No description available.

No description available.

Background: Children have historically been fasted for prolonged periods preoperatively to reduce the volume and acidity of their gastric contents and thus the risk of regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration. Evidence shows that this risk is not increased by following the current recommended fasting guidelines, and that prolonged fasting may be detrimental to children, who may present with hunger, thirst, depleted intravascular volume, metabolic acidosis and hypoglycaemia. A recent study at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital showed a 18.5% prevalence of biochemical hypoglycaemia, defined as a blood glucose concentration of less than 3.5 mmol/l, in children from one to five years of age presenting for elective surgery. Aims: The aims of this study were to document the prevalence of biochemical hypoglycaemia in children from the ages of one to five years who were given apple juice to drink at least two hours preoperatively, and to compare these results to a historical control group. Methods: A prospective, contextual comparative study design was used. Approval was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrandʼs Human Ethics Committee and other relevant authorities. The groups were matched for age and weight. Consent was obtained from the guardians of all children who met the inclusion criteria before being enrolled in the study. A standard 200 ml carton of commercially available apple juice was offered to each participant. The volume and time of the juice consumed was documented, along with relevant demographic data. Inhalational induction of anaesthesia proceeded a minimum of two hours later, and a venous glucose concentration was measured. Results: The prevalence of biochemical hypoglycaemia was statistically significantly reduced in the intervention group (p = 0.0163), eliminating the effect of prolonged preoperative fasting. Conclusion: The consumption of clear apple juice on the morning of surgery is a safe, inexpensive, effective way to reduce the prevalence of hypoglycaemia in children presenting for elective surgery.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Delaware, 2009. / Principal faculty advisor: Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Dept. of Physical Therapy. Includes bibliographical references.

published_or_final_version / Nursing Studies / Master / Master of Nursing

published_or_final_version / Nursing Studies / Master / Master of Nursing

published_or_final_version / Public Health / Master / Master of Public Health

Surgical site infection not only brings morbidity and mortality to patients, but it also bring substantial financial burden to the hospital and the healthcare system. To minimize the clinical consequences of surgical site infection, it is crucial that all appropriate measures for reduction of surgical site infection should be implemented. Since patient’s skin is a potential source of pathogens, normal skin flora is a common cause of surgical site infections. Preoperative skin disinfection of the surgical site with an antiseptic agent is an effective method to remove the soil and transient organisms from the skin. Currently, there are different skin antiseptics available and the most commonly used agents are povidone iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate. Although povidone iodine has a long-standing recommendation and it is widely used in various surgical procedures, it has several limitations. On the other hand, there is an increasing interest of the use of chlorhexidine in indwelling catheter placement and care, surgical hand scrubbing, as well as wound dressing. In view of this, there is a potential of replacing povidone iodine by chlorhexidine as preoperative skin antiseptic agent. As there is no existing guideline supportingthis innovative movement, this dissertation aimed to review the currently available evidence on preoperative skin preparation and to develop an evidence-based guideline of using chlorhexidine in preoperative skin preparation for reducing surgical site infection in patients undergoing general surgery. Five randomized controlled studies were identified from MEDLINE, CINAHL and PUBMED and evaluated by a critical appraisal tool, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. All studies reported that preoperative skin preparation with chlorhexidine is more effective than the use of povidone iodine in reducing surgical site infection. An evidence-based guideline is developed according to the guideline development process from the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. Patient characteristics, local clinical setting, organizational infrastructure and staff competency is congruent with the proposed innovation. The new protocol not only can minimize the risk of postoperative surgical site infection but also save costs. The cost-benefit analysis showed that the new protocol can help to save $675,552 to $1,097,772 (HK dollars) in six-month period after implementation. To facilitate a more comprehensive plan in actual implementation of the proposed guideline, stakeholders at administrative, managerial, and operational levels would be invited to take part in the 12-week pilot test. Surgical site infection, staff satisfaction and compliance, as well as cost and benefit ratio of the guideline would be measured in the evaluation plan. The refined guidelines would then be implemented for one year. The effectiveness of the guideline would be determined by reduction in postoperative surgical site infection, increase in staff knowledge and satisfaction, and the overall expenditure. / published_or_final_version / Nursing Studies / Master / Master of Nursing

Thesis (M.S.)--Ball State University, 2009. / Title from PDF t.p. (viewed on July 12, 2010). Research paper (M.S.), 3 hrs. Includes bibliographical references (p. 59-62).

Thesis (M. Nurs.)--University of Hong Kong, 2006.