Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T23:50:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RafaelSoaresChaves_DISSERT.pdf: 919425 bytes, checksum: 9de0144c3d14bd1f23ad957f686c3442 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-12T19:09:57Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RafaelSoaresChaves_DISSERT.pdf: 919425 bytes, checksum: 9de0144c3d14bd1f23ad957f686c3442 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-12T19:09:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RafaelSoaresChaves_DISSERT.pdf: 919425 bytes, checksum: 9de0144c3d14bd1f23ad957f686c3442 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-12-19 / No Brasil, o uso e o desenvolvimento de instrumentos e tecnologias em sa?de para a garantia do acesso ? sa?de como direito de todos bem como a resolubilidade das diferentes e complexas demandas observadas nos territ?rios representam ponto-chave para o desenvolvimento do SUS em seus princ?pios fundamentais nas diferentes regi?es brasileiras. O Projeto Terap?utico Singular (PTS) ?, atualmente, uma pr?tica ainda n?o incorporada na rotina da maioria das equipes de sa?de na aten??o b?sica e ainda pouco difundida e desenvolvida, apesar de seu grande potencial na produ??o de novas realidades, sobretudo no que diz respeito aos casos complexos. Em virtude disso, justificam-se estudos no sentido de lan?ar luz sobre as realidades das equipes em rela??o ao uso do PTS como ferramenta de gest?o do cuidado em sa?de no ?mbito da ESF. Nesse sentido, o presente trabalho trata de uma pesquisa qualitativa explorat?ria a qual buscou investigar como uma equipe da ESF e uma equipe do NASF que a apoia utilizam o PTS no seu territ?rio, tendo como objetivos espec?ficos: conhecer os sentidos atribu?dos pelos profissionais (das equipes NASF e ESF) ?s no??es de Cl?nica Ampliada, de Apoio Matricial e de Projeto Terap?utico Singular; identificar como as equipes se comunicam e se vinculam para a constru??o do PTS e a realiza??o do apoio matricial; e identificar as potencialidades e dificuldades vividas pelas equipes para o uso do PTS como ferramenta de gest?o do cuidado. Para tanto, a abordagem metodol?gica foi desenvolvida atrav?s de entrevistas individuais semiestruturadas e Grupos Focais com os profissionais das equipes de um munic?pio de pequeno porte do RN. Os dados produzidos pelas entrevistas e pelos Grupos Focais foram organizados e categorizados mediante a an?lise de conte?do proposta por Bardin. Os tr?s eixos de an?lise foram: 1) multiprofissionalidade, corresponsabilidade e resolutividade; 2) concep??es de PTS, dificuldades, falta de experi?ncia e desconhecimento sobre PTS; e 3) articula??o e planejamento das a??es. De modo geral, o estudo apontou a constru??o de PTS como uma pr?tica pontual, sendo uma ferramenta que pouco comp?e o cotidiano das equipes e dos servi?os de sa?de na aten??o b?sica, apesar de ser reconhecidamente importante para a amplia??o das a??es e resolutividade dos problemas dos usu?rios. Al?m disso, o PTS, mesmo n?o sendo uma ferramenta de uso cotidiano, ? desconhecido por muitos e as equipes s?o carentes de experi?ncias que potencializem o seu uso de forma sistem?tica e compartilhada nos espa?os de produ??o do cuidado em sa?de. Desse modo, coloca-se como importante que a??es de qualifica??o da aten??o sejam desenvolvidas junto ?s equipes para o uso do PTS entre outras ferramentas para gest?o do cuidado de forma integral e compartilhada. / In Brazil, the use and development of health instruments and technologies to guarantee the access to health as a right for all its citizens, as well as the solvability of the different and complex demands observed in the territories represent a key point for the development of Sistema ?nico de Sa?de (SUS) in its fundamental principles in different Brazilian regions. The Singular Therapeutic Project (STP) is a not yet currently incorporated practice into the routine of most health care teams in the basic health attention and it is still poorly widespread and developed, despite its great potential in the construction of new realities, especially with regard to complex cases. Taking this context into consideration, studies in this area are justified in order to shed some light on the realities of these teams in relation to the use of STP as a health care management tool within the Family Health Strategy (FHS). In this sense, this study presents an exploratory qualitative research that sought to investigate how a team of FHS and another one of a Family Health Support Nucleus (FHSN), which supports the team of FHS investigated, use the STP in its territory, with specific objectives of: getting to know the meanings assigned to the notions of Expanded Clinic, Matrix Support and Singular Therapeutic Project by the FHSN and FHS teams? professionals; identifying how teams communicate and team up for the construction of the STP and for the execution of matrix support; and identifying the potentialities and difficulties experienced by the teams in using STP as a care management tool. For this, the research methodological approach was developed through semi-structured individual interviews and focus groups with the professionals of the teams of a small city of the state Rio Grande do Norte. The data produced by the interviews and the focus groups were organized and categorized based on the content analysis proposed by Bardin (2011). The three axes of analysis were: 1) multiprofessionality, co-responsibility and resolvability; 2) conceptions of STP, difficulties, lack of experience and knowledge about STP; and 3) articulation and planning of actions. In general, the study pointed to the construction of STP as not being a regular practice, being a tool that does not take part in the daily life of the health teams and services in basic health attention, although it is recognized as important for the expansion of actions and solution of the users? problems. In addition to that, besides the STP is not seen as a tool of daily use, it is unknown by many professionals and the health teams lack experiences that potentialize STP use in a systematic and shared way in the health care production spaces. In this way, it is important that actions towards qualification on health attention for the use of STP are developed together with the teams, among other tools for care management in an integral and shared way.