<p>Abstract</p><p>Is there any difference in practising rescuing service law and law of protection against accidents?</p><p>C-essay in jurisprudence vt 2007.</p><p>Author: Martin Olsson</p><p>Tutor: Stefan Olsson</p><p>In the last seven years the society has been changing it’s thinking around security. Trough the disasters of the World trade centre in the United States and the natural catastrophe in Thailand. Today it’s very important to have a good reliable security. In Sweden we have made a change in the law regulation around security on field of rescuing. The rescuing service (1986:1102) law do no longer exist and it’s replaced by the law (2003:778) of protection against accident. The question is what this means, has this transformation been a positive change or the other way around. The purpose of this essay is to examine “if it is any difference in practising the rescuing law and law of protection against accident” through a case study. The conclusions is based on material from books, the work around the law and interviews of people working with the law on local, regional, central level. From this facts the essay came too the conclusions that the law of protection against accidents is interpret in an extensive way. The old law was interpreted in a restrictive way. This change has made the interpretation more diffuse than before, especially in the regional and the central level. On the local level it became a problem to work in an effective way. They got a heavier administrative work through the demand of a briefing from the individuals with a business where it’s a risk of a fire too start. These briefings were also very diffused formed for the individuals too understand the meaning of it. One positive effect was the direct aim on some objects with a big lack of standard and making them more effective faster then before. The new law made a different working mode for those who work as a supervisor. In the former law they measured how they organised themselves. Today they measure ability. This is positive way too deal with everything around accidents.</p>

Abstract Is there any difference in practising rescuing service law and law of protection against accidents? C-essay in jurisprudence vt 2007. Author: Martin Olsson Tutor: Stefan Olsson In the last seven years the society has been changing it’s thinking around security. Trough the disasters of the World trade centre in the United States and the natural catastrophe in Thailand. Today it’s very important to have a good reliable security. In Sweden we have made a change in the law regulation around security on field of rescuing. The rescuing service (1986:1102) law do no longer exist and it’s replaced by the law (2003:778) of protection against accident. The question is what this means, has this transformation been a positive change or the other way around. The purpose of this essay is to examine “if it is any difference in practising the rescuing law and law of protection against accident” through a case study. The conclusions is based on material from books, the work around the law and interviews of people working with the law on local, regional, central level. From this facts the essay came too the conclusions that the law of protection against accidents is interpret in an extensive way. The old law was interpreted in a restrictive way. This change has made the interpretation more diffuse than before, especially in the regional and the central level. On the local level it became a problem to work in an effective way. They got a heavier administrative work through the demand of a briefing from the individuals with a business where it’s a risk of a fire too start. These briefings were also very diffused formed for the individuals too understand the meaning of it. One positive effect was the direct aim on some objects with a big lack of standard and making them more effective faster then before. The new law made a different working mode for those who work as a supervisor. In the former law they measured how they organised themselves. Today they measure ability. This is positive way too deal with everything around accidents.