The "implicit rules" of the white racial framing shape meanings, structure interactions, and impose identities upon all who enter American society. The context of this current study conceptualizes how this racialized frame differentially shapes the experiences of native African-Americans and African immigrants in America, disrupting associations between these ancestral kinsmen and subsequently interrupting identity processes. The body of knowledge now available depicts the relationship between native and immigrant blacks as "socially-distanced," "divided," "conflicted" – as disconnected. However, I argue that such characterizations – symbolic of the divisive influence of racial structures rooted in America's slave past – evolve from inappropriate evaluation of black behavior within white racial contexts that do not support or encourage such expression. This current mixed-method study re-examines the relationship between native and immigrant blacks from an africentric perspective – a view that captures the authenticity of black behavior in the service of its full development and potential. Based on data obtained from 40 respondents (20 African, 20 African-American) at a Historically Black College/University (HBCU), this study informs our understanding of the workings of the white racial frame and its impact upon identity processes, specifically for native and immigrant blacks in America. This research found that absent the influence of the white racial frame upon identity processes, native African-American and African respondents freely interact and fully express identification with a shared ancestry and heritage; that the most significant disconnect in the relationship exists in identification with a common history given the separation experienced as a direct result of the American slave trade. This separation – still perpetuated today by American racial constructs' divisive characterizations – accounts for the differential experiences and motivations of native and immigrant blacks within American society. As a result, native and immigrant blacks do not contextualize or interpret racial experiences in the same manner, giving birth to the misconception that their identification with each other does not emanate from a shared heritage and promoting as an obvious rift, obscure tensions bred by the white racial framing of American society.

Originalism is a legal framework of constitutional interpretation that re-emerged in the United States in the 1970's as part of the conservative legal movement. In the decades since, originalism has grown in prominence both in government institutions and interest groups. Using critical discourse analysis, this research identifies the frames and narratives developed in originalism and examines how those frames and narratives are used by network members in friend of the Court briefs in Shelby County v. Eric Holder 2013 and Students for Fair Admissions v. Regents of Harvard University 2022. This research finds three dominant frames in the originalist literature and demonstrates how these frames are deployed in amicus brief in support of the petitioners in each of the two cases. This research provides a sociological perspective on the use of originalism and how it is used to reverse civil rights gains.