• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 845
  • 287
  • 101
  • 87
  • 12
  • 10
  • 8
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 7
  • 4
  • 4
  • Tagged with
  • 1616
  • 754
  • 387
  • 326
  • 257
  • 194
  • 152
  • 148
  • 145
  • 105
  • 94
  • 94
  • 89
  • 86
  • 85
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
301

On the Origin of Three Seismic Sources in the Proton-Rich Flare of 2003 October 28.

Zharkova, Valentina V., Zharkov, Sergei I. January 2007 (has links)
No / The three seismic sources, S1, S2, and S3, detected from MDI Dopplergrams using the time-distance (TD) diagram technique are presented with the locations, areas, and vertical and horizontal velocities of the visible wave displacements. Within the data cube of 120 Mm, the horizontal velocities and the wave propagation times vary slightly from source to source. The momenta and start times measured from the TD diagrams in sources S1-S3 are compared with those delivered to the photosphere by different kinds of high-energy particles with the parameters deduced from hard X-ray and ¿-ray emission, as well as by the hydrodynamic shocks caused by these particles. The energetic protons (power laws combined with quasi-thermal ones, or jets) are shown to deliver momentum high enough and to form the hydrodynamic shocks deep enough in a flaring atmosphere to allow them to be delivered to the photosphere through much shorter distances and times. Then the seismic waves observed in the sources S2 and S3 can be explained by the momenta produced by hydrodynamic shocks, which are caused by mixed proton beams and jets occurring nearly simultaneously with the third burst of hard X-ray and ¿-ray emission in the loops with footpoints in the locations of these sources. The seismic wave in source S1, delayed by 4 and 2 minutes from the first and second hard X-ray bursts, respectively, is likely to be associated with a hydrodynamic shock occurring in this loop from precipitation of a very powerful and hard electron beam with higher energy cutoff mixed with quasi-thermal protons generated by either of these two bursts.
302

Track widths of heavy ions and unit magnetic poles

Butts, Jesse James January 2011 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas State University Libraries
303

Direct method of measuring intensity of diffraction pattern by photoelectric cell

Brandhorst, Armin Ervin. January 1931 (has links)
Call number: LD2668 .T4 1931 B71
304

Primary cosmic ray composition at 10 [to the power] 15--10 [to the power] 17eV studied from extensive air shower simulations

張增, Cheung, Tsang. January 1985 (has links)
published_or_final_version / Physics / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy
305

LEAP: A balloon-borne search for low energy cosmic ray antiprotons.

Moats, Anne Rosalie Myers. January 1989 (has links)
The LEAP (Low-Energy Antiproton) experiment is a search for cosmic-ray antiprotons in the 120 MeV to 1.2 GeV kinetic energy range. The motivation for this project was the result announced by Buffington et al. (1981) that indicated an anomalously high antiproton flux below 300 MeV; this result has compelled theorists to propose sources of primary antiprotons above the small secondary antiproton flux produced by high energy cosmic-ray collisions with nuclei in the interstellar medium. LEAP consisted of the NMSU magnet spectrometer, a time-of-flight system designed at Goddard Space Flight Center, two scintillation detectors, and a Cherenkov counter designed and built at the University of Arizona. Analysis of flight data performed by the high-energy astrophysics group at Goddard Space Flight Center revealed no antiproton candidates found in the 120 MeV to 360 MeV range; 3 possible antiproton candidate events were found in the 500 MeV to 1.2 GeV range in an analysis done here at the University of Arizona. However, since it will be necessary to sharpen the calibration on all of the LEAP systems in order to positively identify these events as antiprotons, only an upper limit has been determined at present. Thus, combining the analyses performed at the University of Arizona and Goddard Space Flight Center, 90% confidence upper limits of 3.5 x 10⁻⁵ in the 120 MeV to 360 MeV range and 2.3 x 10⁻⁴ in the 500 MeV to 1.2 GeV range for the antiproton/proton ratio is indicated by the LEAP results. LEAP disagrees sharply with the results of the Buffington group, indicating a low antiproton flux at these energies. Thus, a purely secondary antiproton flux may be adequate at low energies.
306

The search for e/3 quarks in the Leeds cloud chamber

Taylor, R. S. January 1988 (has links)
No description available.
307

Structural transitions in cobalt-insulin investigated with semi-time resolved cryocrystallography and high pressure crystallography

Nicholson, James Martin January 1997 (has links)
No description available.
308

Gamma Ray Distribution from Neutron Excitation in Cesium

Bowers, Richard Morgan 01 1900 (has links)
The purpose of this investigation was to analyze the gamma rays resulting from excitation of Cs133 by the inelastic scattering of 14 MeV neutrons and to determine the relative intensity of each gamma ray.
309

Electron scattering and X-ray production

Bishop, Hugh Edward January 1966 (has links)
No description available.
310

Gamma rays, cosmic rays and local molecular clouds

Richardson, K. M. January 1988 (has links)
No description available.

Page generated in 0.0316 seconds