Spelling suggestions: "subject:"realtime lemsystems."" "subject:"realtime atemsystems.""
21 |
Real-Time Motion and Stereo Cues for Active Visual ObserversBjörkman, Mårten January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
22 |
Response time analysis for implementation of distributed control systemsRedell, Ola January 2003 (has links)
Methods for performing response time analysis of real-timesystems are important, not only for their use in traditionalschedulability testing, but also for deriving bounds on outputtiming variations in control applications. Automatic controlsystems are inherently sensitive to variations in periodicityand end-to-end delays. Therefore, real-time performance needsto be considered during control design. For this purpose, anyreal-time analysis of a potential control implementation shouldproduce results that can easily be used to examine how theimplementation affects control performance. To find the maximumresponse time variation for a task, bounds on both minimum andmaximum response times are needed. A tight bound on thismaximum variation is useful in the analysis of controlperformance and can also be used to improve the results of someiterative response time analysis methods. In this thesis, threemethods for response time analysis are developed. While earlier research has focused on bounding maximumresponse times, one of the analysis methods in this thesisallows a computation of the minimum response times ofindependent fixed priority scheduled tasks. The analysis findsthe largest lower bound of response times for such tasks, whichleads to a tighter bound on the response time variations. Asecond analysis method allows exact computation of maximumresponse times for tasks whose arrival times are related byoffsets. The method is a complement to schedule simulationbased analysis, which it outperforms for systems with tasksthat may experience release jitter. A common design principle for distributed real-time systemsis to let the completion of one task trigger the start of oneor more successors. A third method supporting the analysis oftasks in such systems is described. The method extends andimproves earlier methods as it allows a generalized systemmodel and also results in tighter bounds than the originalmethods. This method has been implemented as part of a toolsetthat enables an integrated approach to the design and analysisof control systems and their implementation as distributedreal-time systems. As part of the thesis, models for describingdistributed control systems have been developed. The toolset,which is based on these models, uses the derived response timebounds in a control system performance analysis based onsimulation. The use of the toolset is exemplified in a smallcase study. <b>Keywords:</b>real-time systems, scheduling, response time,fixed priority, control, jitter, offset, schedulabilityanalysis
|
23 |
An Effective GA-Based Scheduling Algorithm for FlexRay SystemsTAKADA, Hiroaki, TOMIYAMA, Hiroyuki, DING, Shan 01 August 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
24 |
Real-Time Systems with Radiation-Hardened Processors : A GPU-based Framework to Explore TradeoffsAlhowaidi, Mohammad January 2012 (has links)
Radiation-hardened processors are designed to be resilient against soft errorsbut such processors are slower than Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS)processors as well significantly costlier. In order to mitigate the high costs,software techniques such as task re-executions must be deployed together withadequately hardened processors to provide reliability. This leads to a huge designspace comprising of the hardening level of the processors and the numberof re-executions of each task in the system. Each configuration in this designspace represents a tradeoff between processor load, reliability and costs. The reliability comes at the price of higher costs due to higher levels of hardeningand performance degradation due to hardening or due to re-executions.Thus, the tradeoffs between performance, reliability and costs must be carefullystudied. Pertinent questions that arise in such a design scenario are — (i)how many times a task must be re-executed and (ii) what should be hardeninglevel? — such that the system reliability is satisfied. In order to evaluate such tradeoffs efficiently, in this thesis, we proposenovel framework that harnesses the computational power of Graphics ProcessingUnits (GPUs). Our framework is based on a system failure probabilityanalysis that connects the probability of failure of tasks to the overall systemreliability. Based on characteristics of this probabilistic analysis as well asreal-time deadlines, we derive bounds on the design space to prune infeasiblesolutions. Finally, we illustrate the benefits of our proposed framework withseveral experiments
|
25 |
Worst Case Execution time Analysis Support for the ARM Processor Using GCCYen, Cheng-Yu 09 August 2010 (has links)
This thesis presents a tool for obtaining worst-case execution time (WCET) guarantees for ARM processors. This tool is an interface between ARM¡¦s GCC compiler and the SWEET WCET analyzer. SWEET is an open-source static analyzer that derives a guaranteed upper bound on the WCET of a program.
The WCET of a program is an important metric in real-time systems. The task scheduler must decide how much time to allot for each process; if the allotted time exceeds the WCET, the process can be guaranteed to always finish in time. Although the WCET value is therefore useful, it is difficult to find. But, for the purpose of guaranteeing that a process finishes on time, an upper bound on the WCET suffices. Static program analysis has been proposed as a method to derive such an upper-bound on the WCET, by means of conservatively approximating the runtime of the individual parts of a complete program. SWEET is one such static analyzer.
Our tool works inside of ARM-GCC, extracting all of the information that SWEET needs about the program¡¦s behavior. Our tool then packages the information into the SWEET¡¦s ALF format. The tool has been tested and works correctly for every input source that we have tested (including all 34 benchmarks from the WCET BENCHMARK SUITE[1]).
This work was funded by Taiwan¡¦s National Science Council, grant NSC 97-2218-E-110-003
|
26 |
A Stack-Optimized Scratchpad Memory Allocator for Reducing Either the Average-Case or the Worst-Case Execution TimeWu, Cheng-Ying 10 August 2009 (has links)
Scratchpad memory (SPM) is popular for real-time embedded systems. Whereas caches use a memory management unit (MMU) to control which data accesses go to the fast, on-chip SRAM, SPM directly maps certain addresses to the SRAM. One advantage of SPM is that it avoids the cache¡¦s costly MMU. Another advantage is that the SPM is 100% statically predictable, whereas the variables stored in the cache depend upon the dynamic execution history. This predictability is beneficial for real-time systems which must schedule tasks to finish by fixed deadlines. To set these deadlines, system designers must determine the worst-case execution times (WCETs) of the applications. The predictability of SPM makes these WCETs easier to measure.
This thesis presents a new method for allocating stack and global data to the SPM. It is the first method to make use of the special properties of non-escaping variables so as to increase the effective size of the SPM. Our insight is that many local variables of caller functions can be temporarily swapped out of the SPM while the callee function executes.
Ours is also the first method to support profiled WCET measurements in the allocation strategy. Most previous SPM methods optimize only for the average-case execution time (ACET), despite the fact that SPMs are often used in real-time environments where the WCET is also important. This new memory allocation strategy is also the first to be WCET/ACET tunable, a feature that is particular useful for soft real-time systems.
Only one previous work considers a WCET-targeted SPM allocator. That work, however, only applies to static WCET analysis tools. Such tools are difficult to program and are not widely used. Also, they only have application to the most safety-critical of real-time systems. In contrast, our approach is the first to employ measurement-based WCET analysis (such as is most commonly used in industry) for SPM allocation.
|
27 |
Implementation Strategies for Time Constraint MonitoringGustavsson, Sanny January 1999 (has links)
<p>An event monitor is a part of a real-time system that can be used to</p><p>check if the system follows the specifications posed on its behavior. This dissertation covers an approach to event monitoring where such specifications (represented by time constraints) are represented by graphs.</p><p>Not much work has previously been done on designing and implementing constraint graph-based event monitors. In this work, we focus on presenting an extensible design for such an event monitor. We also evaluate different data structure types (linked lists, dynamic arrays, and static arrays) that can be used for representing the constraint graphs internally. This is done by creating an event monitor implementation, and conducting a number of benchmarks where the time used by the monitor is measured.</p><p>The result is presented in the form of a design specification and a summary of the benchmark results. Dynamic arrays are found to be the generally most efficient, but advantages and disadvantages of all the data structure types are discussed.</p>
|
28 |
Real-Time Motion and Stereo Cues for Active Visual ObserversBjörkman, Mårten January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
29 |
Response time analysis for implementation of distributed control systemsRedell, Ola January 2003 (has links)
<p>Methods for performing response time analysis of real-timesystems are important, not only for their use in traditionalschedulability testing, but also for deriving bounds on outputtiming variations in control applications. Automatic controlsystems are inherently sensitive to variations in periodicityand end-to-end delays. Therefore, real-time performance needsto be considered during control design. For this purpose, anyreal-time analysis of a potential control implementation shouldproduce results that can easily be used to examine how theimplementation affects control performance. To find the maximumresponse time variation for a task, bounds on both minimum andmaximum response times are needed. A tight bound on thismaximum variation is useful in the analysis of controlperformance and can also be used to improve the results of someiterative response time analysis methods. In this thesis, threemethods for response time analysis are developed.</p><p>While earlier research has focused on bounding maximumresponse times, one of the analysis methods in this thesisallows a computation of the minimum response times ofindependent fixed priority scheduled tasks. The analysis findsthe largest lower bound of response times for such tasks, whichleads to a tighter bound on the response time variations. Asecond analysis method allows exact computation of maximumresponse times for tasks whose arrival times are related byoffsets. The method is a complement to schedule simulationbased analysis, which it outperforms for systems with tasksthat may experience release jitter.</p><p>A common design principle for distributed real-time systemsis to let the completion of one task trigger the start of oneor more successors. A third method supporting the analysis oftasks in such systems is described. The method extends andimproves earlier methods as it allows a generalized systemmodel and also results in tighter bounds than the originalmethods. This method has been implemented as part of a toolsetthat enables an integrated approach to the design and analysisof control systems and their implementation as distributedreal-time systems. As part of the thesis, models for describingdistributed control systems have been developed. The toolset,which is based on these models, uses the derived response timebounds in a control system performance analysis based onsimulation. The use of the toolset is exemplified in a smallcase study.</p><p><b>Keywords:</b>real-time systems, scheduling, response time,fixed priority, control, jitter, offset, schedulabilityanalysis</p>
|
30 |
Ενοποιημένο τυπικό μοντέλο για την αναπαράσταση της λειτουργικότητας και την ανάλυση της χρονοδρομολογησιμότητας εφαρμογών πραγματικού χρόνουΓερογιάννης, Βασίλης 10 September 2009 (has links)
- / -
|
Page generated in 0.0392 seconds