This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

No description available.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

Reclamation of four salt-affected soils collected from southern Arizona was studied in the greenhouse and laboratory. Two rates of four amendments (sulphuric acid, gypsum, ammonium polysulphide, and ammonium thiosulphate) were applied in triplicate. Results were evaluated in terms of changes in nutrient availability, ions removed by leaching, plant growth, and infiltration rates. In most cases the high rates of sulphuric acid and gypsum increased the solubility of the major cations (Na, K, Ca, and Mg) in the soil. If the required amount of leaching water were applied to the soil, a significant amount of these cations, especially Na, was leached from the soil. For the Gothard soil (saline-sodic) two pore volumes were sufficient to accomplish leaching, but were insuffcient for the Guest (nonsaline-slightly sodic) and Gilman (highly saline-sodic) soils. High rates of sulphuric acid and gypsum decreased the pH and increased the EC for all soils, although the EC was not significant at the 5% level for the Mohall (nonsaline-nonsodic, calcareous) soil. All treatments decreased the pH of the Gothard soil significantly; however, the greatest increase in EC and least pH were obtained from acid application. Regarding changes in phosphorus (P), all treatments increased the amount of soluble P in the leachates from the Gothard and Guest soils; whereas available soil P increased significantly only with the acid treatments. None of the treatments affected the amount of P in the Gilman soil leachates, but acid and gypsum increased the available soil P. Ammonium polysulphide and ammonium thiosulphate tended to increase available P but the increase was not significant at the 5% level. None of the treatments affected the P parameters for the Mohall soil. Sulphuric acid increased growth and P uptake of alfalfa plants on all soils except the Mohall. Gypsum and ammonium polysulphide increased P uptake on the Gothard and Guest soils whereas ammonium thiosulphate increased P uptake only for the Guest soil. Sulphuric acid and gypsum increased the infiltration rates for all four soils. Thiosulphate produced intermediate infiltration rates while the lowest rates were found with ammonium polysulphide and the untreated soils. Although amendment rates were based on equivalent amounts of sulphur and their effectiveness in supplying soluble calcium, and the exchangeable sodium status of each soil, results varied according to such factors as rate of oxidation of the amendment, lime content of the soil, soluble salts present in the soil, and soil texture.

No description available.

Research was conducted at Cyprus Pima Mine, an open pit copper mine located southwest of Tucson, Arizona, in 1980 and 1981 to study the establishment of annual and perennial grasses on the slopes of copper mine tailing ponds. In 1980, the north and south slope exposures were hydroseeded with barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plots were capped with topsoil prior to planting or left uncapped, and mulched with wheat straw after planting or left unmulched. Desert soil was classified as Palos Verdes-Sonoita Complex and Detrital-Sonoita Complex. Barley provided a quick, temporary cover and served as a mulch for later plantings. The number of seedlings established was the same for both exposures. Barley grew taller on the north slope possibly due to cooler temperatures. Barley growth was more vigorous on mulched areas. In 1981, the same north and south slopes were hydroseeded with Lehmann lovegrass (Eragrostis lehmanniana Nees.), buffel grass (Pennisetum cilare (L.) Link), blue panicgrass (Panicum antidotale Retz.) and bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.). Prior to planting perennials, barley residue was incorporated into the slopes using a spike-tooth chain drag and a sheepfoot roller, or was left unincorporated. Incorporation of barley residue aided in its breakdown and helped prepare a good seedbed. The spike-tooth chain drag produced better growth than the sheepfoot roller, possibly due to excessive soil compaction with the sheepfoot roller. Capping tailing slopes with desert soil produced the most significant improvements in barley and perennial grass growth. Soil analyses of pure tailing and capped tailing revealed both were low in nitrogen and phosphorus. All plots were amended with these nutrients. Organic matter, although low for both samples, was higher in the capped tailing sample. Organic matter improves soil structure and provides nutrients and its increased presence may have been the main reason for improved growth on capped slopes.

No description available.