Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-02-13T19:58:37Z No. of bitstreams: 1 GeailsonSoaresPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1582105 bytes, checksum: dcf50b5a7c4baad76384233f4e805704 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-02-15T22:27:35Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 GeailsonSoaresPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1582105 bytes, checksum: dcf50b5a7c4baad76384233f4e805704 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-15T22:27:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 GeailsonSoaresPereira_DISSERT.pdf: 1582105 bytes, checksum: dcf50b5a7c4baad76384233f4e805704 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-08-25 / Estuda os limites e fundamentos da aplica??o do instituto Cram Down para fins de concretiza??o do princ?pio da preserva??o da empresa no Estado Democr?tico de Direito. Descreve os tr?s modelos de Estado e suas origens no direito costumeiro da Antiguidade. Exp?e as dimens?es cumulativas de direito fundamentais caracterizadoras de cada um dos modelos de Estado. Ressalta a import?ncia da Hermen?utica Jur?dica para a interpreta??o e concretiza??o do princ?pio da preserva??o da empresa via Cram Down, especialmente em aten??o aos princ?pios da seguran?a jur?dica, da propriedade privada e da fun??o social da propriedade. Enfatiza que os m?todos cl?ssicos de interpreta??o das normas jur?dicas, assim como os novos m?todos hermen?uticos e escolas hermern?uticas s?o insuficientes para a compreens?o do fen?meno jur?dico se n?o observadas a coer?ncia e a integridade do sistema jur?dico. Ressalta a evolu??o do direito concursal, especialmente para demonstrar a mitiga??o do car?ter repressivo e ado??o de institutos que permitem a recupera??o do devedor. Compara o direito concursal atual de v?rios pa?ses para averiguar se adotam o instituto do Cram Down. Conclui que a concess?o da Recupera??o Judicial pela via do Cram Down, atendidos os requisitos legais, ? um dever do juiz e n?o uma mera conveni?ncia. / This study has as its scope the limits and grounds of the Cram Down, legal institute whose purpose is to bring efficacy to the principle of preservation of economic activities in the Rule of Law. Firstly, it describes the three different types of State and their origin in Ancient costumary law. Furthermore, it elicits cumulative dimensions of fundamental rights that characterize each one of them. Moreover, it stresses the importance of Legal Hermeneutics to best interpret and bind that institute, especially in order to enforce legal certainty, private property and the social function of property. It emphasizes that neither classic methods of legal norm interpretation nor the latest hermeneutics models and schools will be enough to best comprehend legal phenomena if the legal system?s coherence and integrity are not complied with. It also draws attention to the evolution of bankruptcy law, especially in order to demonstrate the mitigation of its repressive character and the adoption of institutes that allow the debtor?s recovery. In addition, it makes a study of comparative law on the bankruptcy law of a number of countries by means of ascertain if they adopt the Cram Down. Its conclusion denotes the Cram Down as a duty of the judge, and not mere convenience, as long as its legal requirements are met.