Well-detailed reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls did not achieve the expected seismic performance in the 2011 Christchurch earthquake as per the Canterbury earthquake royal commission report. Similarly, RC shear walls showed low seismic performance in the 2010 Maule earthquake. The two major seismic events intrigued this research dissertation, where six half-scaled RC shear walls were constructed and tested. The six walls were split into two phases, each phase had different end configurations (i.e., rectangular, flanged, and boundary elements). Phase II RC walls had 2.4 times the vertical reinforcement ratio of Phase I walls. The walls were detailed as per CSA A23.3-19, and they were tested laterally under a quasi-static cyclic fully-reversed loading while maintaining a constant axial load through the full test of the walls. The overall seismic performance of the six walls is evaluated in Chapters 2 and 3 in terms of their load-displacement relationships, crack patterns, displacement ductility capacities, stiffness degradation trends, curvature profiles, end strains, energy dissipation capabilities, and equivalent viscous damping ratios. In addition, damage states are specified according to the Federal Emergency Management Assessment (FEMA P58) guidelines. The results came in agreement with the Canterbury earthquake royal commission report, where the test walls with low vertical reinforcement ratios showed lower-than-expected seismic performance due to the concentration of their plastic hinges at the primary crack locations. Moreover, the results validated the Christchurch (2011) and Maule (2010) earthquake findings as concentrating the rebars at the end zones and providing adequate confinement enhanced the seismic performance of the test walls, which was the case for Phase II flanged and boundary element walls. The displacement ductility variations of the test walls inspired the work of Chapter 4, where the objective is to develop a data-driven expression for RC shear walls to better quantify their displacement ductility capacities. In this respect, an analytical model is developed and experimentally validated using several RC walls. The analytical model is then used to generate a dataset of RC walls with a wide range of geometrical configurations and design parameters, including cross-sectional properties, aspect ratios, axial loads, vertical reinforcement ratio, and concrete compressive strengths. This dataset is utilized to develop two data-driven prediction expressions for the displacement ductility of RC walls with rectangular and flanged/boundary element end configurations. The developed data-driven expressions accurately predicted the displacement ductility of such walls and they should be adopted by relevant building codes and design standards, instead of assigning a single ductility-related modification factor for all ductile RC shear walls, as per the 2020 National Building Code of Canada. Several researchers tested well-detailed Reinforced Masonry (RM) shear walls and the results concluded that RM shear walls showed high seismic performance similar to that of RC shear walls. This intrigued the research efforts presented in Chapter 5, where a comparative analysis is performed between the six RC walls tested in this dissertation and three RM walls tested in a previous experimental program. The analysis focuses on comparing the seismic performance of both wall systems in terms of their crack patterns, load-displacement envelopes, curvature profiles, displacement ductility, normalized periods, and equivalent viscous damping ratios. In addition, an economic assessment is performed to compare such RC and RM shear walls using their total rebar weights and the total construction costs. Overall, RM shear walls achieved an acceptable seismic performance coupled with low rebar weights and low construction costs when compared to their RC counterparts. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Shear-wall dominant multi-story reinforced concrete structures, constructed by using a special tunnel form technique are commonly built in countries facing a substantial seismic risk, such as Chile, Japan, Italy and Turkey. In 1999, two severe urban earthquakes struck Kocaeli and D&uuml / zce provinces in Turkey with magnitudes (Mw) 7.4 and 7.1, respectively. These catastrophes caused substantial structural damage, casualties and loss of lives. In the aftermath of these destructive earthquakes, neither demolished nor damaged shear-wall dominant buildings constructed by tunnel form techniques were reported. In spite of their high resistance to earthquake excitations, current seismic code provisions including the Uniform Building Code and the Turkish Seismic Code present limited information for their design criteria. This study presents experimental investigation of the panel unit having H-geometry. To investigate the seismic behavior of panel buildings, two prototype test specimens which have H wall design were tested at the Structural Mechanics Laboratory at METU. The experimental work involves the testing of two four-story, 1/5-scale reinforced concrete panel form building test specimens under lateral reversed loading, simulating the seismic forces and free vibration tests. Free vibration tests before and after cracking were done to assess the differences between the dynamic properties of uncracked and cracked test specimens. A moment-curvature program named Waller2002 for shear walls is developed to include the effects of steel strain hardening, confinement of concrete and tension strength of concrete. The moment-curvature relationships of panel form test specimens showed that walls with very low longitudinal steel ratios exhibit a brittle flexural failure with very little energy absorption. Shear walls of panel form test specimens have a reinforcement ratio of 0.0015 in the longitudinal and vertical directions. Under gradually increasing reversed lateral loading, the test specimens reached ultimate strength, as soon as the concrete cracked, followed by yielding and then rupturing of the longitudinal steel. The displacement ductility of the panel form test specimens was found to be very low. Thus, the occurrence of rupture of the longitudinal steel, as also observed in analytical studies, has been experimentally verified. Strength, stiffness, energy dissipation and story drifts of the test specimens were examined by evaluating the test results.

Low-aspect-ratio reinforced concrete (RC) shear walls, characterized by height-to-length ratios of less than two, have been widely used as a seismic force-resisting system (SFRS) in a wide array of structures, ranging from conventional buildings to critical infrastructure systems such as nuclear facilities. Despite their extensive applications, recent research has brought to light the inadequate understanding of their seismic performance, primarily attributed to the intricate nonlinear flexure-shear interaction behaviour unique to these walls. In this respect, the current research dissertation aims to bridge this knowledge gap by conducting a comprehensive evaluation to quantify the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls when used in different applications. Chapter 2 focuses on low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls that are employed in residential and industrial structures. Considering their significance, the seismic response modification factors of such walls, as defined in various standards, are thoroughly examined and evaluated utilizing the FEMA P695 methodology. The analysis revealed potential deficiencies in the current code-based recommendations for response modification factors. Consequently, a novel set of response modification factors, capable of mitigating the seismic risk of collapse under the maximum considered earthquake, is proposed. Such proposed values can be integrated into the forthcoming revisions of relevant building codes and design standards. While the FEMA P695 methodology offers a comprehensive approach to assessing building seismic performance factors, its practical implementation is associated with many challenges for practicing engineers. Specifically, the methodology heavily relies on resource-intensive and time-consuming incremental dynamic analyses, making it less feasible for routine engineering practices. To enhance its practicality, a data-driven framework is developed in Chapter 3, circumventing the need for such demanding analyses. This framework provides genetic programming-based expressions capable of producing accurate predictions of the median collapse intensities—a key metric in the acceptance criteria of the FEMA P695 methodology, for different structural systems. To demonstrate its use, the developed framework is operationalized to low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls and the predictive expression is evaluated considering several statistical and structural parameters, which showed its adequacy in predicting the median collapse intensities of such walls. Furthermore, the adaptability of this framework is showcased, highlighting its applicability across various SFRSs. Chapters 4 and 5 tackle the scarcity of experimental assessments pertaining to the seismic performance of low-aspect-ratio RC walls in nuclear facilities. The seismic hybrid simulation testing technique is employed herein to merge the simplicity of numerical simulations with the efficiency of experimental tests. Hybrid simulation can overcome obstacles related to physical specimen sizes, limited actuator capacities, and space constraints in most laboratories. In these two chapters, the experimental program delves into evaluating the seismic performance of three two-storey low-aspect-ratio nuclear RC walls under different earthquake levels, including operational, design, and beyond-design-level scenarios. Diverse design configurations, including the use of increased thickness boundary elements and different materials (i.e., normal- and high-strength reinforcement), are considered in such walls to provide a comprehensive understanding of several structural parameters and economic metrics. Key structural parameters, such as the force-displacement responses, multi-storey effects, lateral and rotational stiffnesses, ductility capacities, displacement components, rebar strains, crack patterns and damage sequences, are all investigated to provide direct comparisons between the walls in terms of their seismic performances. Additionally, economic metrics, including the total rebar weights, overall construction costs and the expected seismic repair costs, are considered in order to evaluate the seismic performance of the walls considering an economic perspective. The findings of this experimental investigation are expected to inform future nuclear design standards by enhancing the resilience and safety of their structures incorporating low-aspect-ratio RC shear walls. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)