No description available.

Reinforcing steel in concrete has been used for many years in roads, bridges and other structures to give strength and durability; concrete has only good compressive strength and reinforcing steel gives the tensile strength to the concrete to sustain both the compressive and tensile load, making concrete structures to be used in the common as well as critical areas. Reinforcing steel that was used in structures predominantly is mild steel, which is considerably cheaper than stainless steel, and more susceptible to corrosion leading to the damage of the structures and less longevity. To solve the problem with the use of mild steel in critical areas, such as bridges; stainless steel is used; which has iron as the main constituents along with the chromium as the major alloying element and various grades are manufactured varying the compositions of steel. To reduce the cost of the stainless steel, some compositions like chromium, molybdenum, nickel are varied; especially the nickel is being replaced by manganese, the cost of which is significantly less than that of nickel. The alternative grades of the reinforcing steel that were used for testing the corrosion resistance are mild steel (400), weldable mild steel (400 W) and four stainless steel 316LN, UNS 24100 (Enduramet 32), 2304, LDX 2101; among them 316LN and UNS 24100 are the austenitic steels (Valbruna) and 2304 and LDX 2101 are duplex steels (Outokumpu). The austenitic steels have no ferritic phase which is making austenitic steel more corrosion resistance than the duplex steels which have almost equal parts of the ferritic and austenitic phases. Concrete that is used commonly as the shield for the reinforcing steel providing the environment to passivate the reinforcement. Concrete has the pH of ~13.5 which is the equivalent to the pH of the pore solution. Its strength and curing time varies due to the water cement ratio and composition and also the environment in which it is placed. Good quality concrete has less permeability and fewer cracks thereby limiting the ingress of the de-icing slats to the reinforcing steel and delaying the onset of corrosion. Corrosion of the reinforcing steels was tested in concrete using both an accelerated exposure test and ASTM A 955M standard for cracked prisms to measure the corrosion rate and open circuit potential, which are quantitative measurement for corrosion. It is hoped that the results will provide a guide for the future use of the alternative grades of the reinforcing steel to be used in the concrete. Reinforcing mild steels were compared to determine if there is any advantage in using the more carefully controlled 400W welding grade, rather than the 400 grade. The service life of structures with the 400 grade of steel is well established and so the data from the 400 grade also provided a relative measure of corrosion resistance for the alternative grades of the stainless steel. Microcell corrosion of the reinforcing steel was monitored by the use of the linear polarization and the corrosion potential. The data for show that there is no significant corrosion on any of the stainless steels after 15 months of measurement, whereas both the mild steels embedded in the concrete corroded fully as confirmed by visual observation of the beams after autopsying The autopsied samples were then analysed for chloride content in the concrete adjacent to the reinforcing bars. This was accomplished by titration. The chloride content on the beams with 400 and 400W grades was found to be higher than the beams with the stainless steels, where the percentage of chloride remained almost the same. Macrocell corrosion tests were performed on the ASTM A 955M cracked prisms and showed changes in corrosion current density in agreement with the accelerated corrosion current density of the stainless steels. The only difference was observed in the corrosion potentials of the 400 and 400W steels, which were more negative in the cracked prisms than in the beams. In summary, all the stainless steels showed evident corrosion resistance both in accelerated and ASTM A 955M prisms tests and no sign of corrosion was found in the stainless steels after 400 days in beams and 200 days in prisms. The regular and weldable steels corroded in both tests in agreement with the data present in research.

Reinforcing steel in concrete has been used for many years in roads, bridges and other structures to give strength and durability; concrete has only good compressive strength and reinforcing steel gives the tensile strength to the concrete to sustain both the compressive and tensile load, making concrete structures to be used in the common as well as critical areas. Reinforcing steel that was used in structures predominantly is mild steel, which is considerably cheaper than stainless steel, and more susceptible to corrosion leading to the damage of the structures and less longevity. To solve the problem with the use of mild steel in critical areas, such as bridges; stainless steel is used; which has iron as the main constituents along with the chromium as the major alloying element and various grades are manufactured varying the compositions of steel. To reduce the cost of the stainless steel, some compositions like chromium, molybdenum, nickel are varied; especially the nickel is being replaced by manganese, the cost of which is significantly less than that of nickel. The alternative grades of the reinforcing steel that were used for testing the corrosion resistance are mild steel (400), weldable mild steel (400 W) and four stainless steel 316LN, UNS 24100 (Enduramet 32), 2304, LDX 2101; among them 316LN and UNS 24100 are the austenitic steels (Valbruna) and 2304 and LDX 2101 are duplex steels (Outokumpu). The austenitic steels have no ferritic phase which is making austenitic steel more corrosion resistance than the duplex steels which have almost equal parts of the ferritic and austenitic phases. Concrete that is used commonly as the shield for the reinforcing steel providing the environment to passivate the reinforcement. Concrete has the pH of ~13.5 which is the equivalent to the pH of the pore solution. Its strength and curing time varies due to the water cement ratio and composition and also the environment in which it is placed. Good quality concrete has less permeability and fewer cracks thereby limiting the ingress of the de-icing slats to the reinforcing steel and delaying the onset of corrosion. Corrosion of the reinforcing steels was tested in concrete using both an accelerated exposure test and ASTM A 955M standard for cracked prisms to measure the corrosion rate and open circuit potential, which are quantitative measurement for corrosion. It is hoped that the results will provide a guide for the future use of the alternative grades of the reinforcing steel to be used in the concrete. Reinforcing mild steels were compared to determine if there is any advantage in using the more carefully controlled 400W welding grade, rather than the 400 grade. The service life of structures with the 400 grade of steel is well established and so the data from the 400 grade also provided a relative measure of corrosion resistance for the alternative grades of the stainless steel. Microcell corrosion of the reinforcing steel was monitored by the use of the linear polarization and the corrosion potential. The data for show that there is no significant corrosion on any of the stainless steels after 15 months of measurement, whereas both the mild steels embedded in the concrete corroded fully as confirmed by visual observation of the beams after autopsying The autopsied samples were then analysed for chloride content in the concrete adjacent to the reinforcing bars. This was accomplished by titration. The chloride content on the beams with 400 and 400W grades was found to be higher than the beams with the stainless steels, where the percentage of chloride remained almost the same. Macrocell corrosion tests were performed on the ASTM A 955M cracked prisms and showed changes in corrosion current density in agreement with the accelerated corrosion current density of the stainless steels. The only difference was observed in the corrosion potentials of the 400 and 400W steels, which were more negative in the cracked prisms than in the beams. In summary, all the stainless steels showed evident corrosion resistance both in accelerated and ASTM A 955M prisms tests and no sign of corrosion was found in the stainless steels after 400 days in beams and 200 days in prisms. The regular and weldable steels corroded in both tests in agreement with the data present in research.

This thesis investigated corrosion of a reinforcing steel bar embedded in concrete and the effect of corrosion coupling on the bar/concrete interface induced by the variation of corrosion potentials with concrete depth. Two separate numerical models were used to simulate the corrosion process which included: a two-dimensional finite element model for mass transport of oxygen and chloride to the bar/concrete interface; and, a one-dimensional model for the corrosion current flow through the electrolyte induced by corrosion potential differences on the bar/concrete interface. A novel approach to corrosion modeling in reinforced concrete that had not been identified in the literature was used. This new approach, incorporated: variable solution conductivity developed from concentrations within the pore solution; anodic and cathodic areas modified to maximize corrosion current through the electrolyte; and, kinetics of corrosion set by the pore solution chemistry. Various reinforcing configurations and moisture conditions were evaluated within the simulation to obtain insight into the effect these variables have on corrosion potentials measured on the concrete surface and the corresponding corrosion currents generated on the bar/concrete interface. Variables related to bar diameter, concrete cover, and bar spacing where all shown to affect corrosion potentials and current densities on the bar/concrete interface and the concrete surface where field measurements are obtained. Moisture conditions were found to have the largest impact on corrosion potentials and current density’s on the bar/concrete interface. When relative humidity’s of 90% or higher were used, simulated corrosion potentials on the concrete surface under high chloride conditions were found to reach values identified in ASTM C876 and Alberta Transportations Deck Testing Guidelines that indicate active corrosion. However, when moisture conditions were reduced to below 90% relative humidity, simulated corrosion potentials on the concrete surface for high chloride concentrations did not achieve values that indicate a high probability of corrosion. This result suggests a secondary mechanism must be present on the bar/concrete interface that changes the chemical composition within the pore solution to shift the kinetics of corrosion to an environment that will produce the negative corrosion potentials recognized as indicating a high probability of corrosion. Therefore, a new mechanism is proposed that outlines the process necessary for the pore solution on the bar/concrete interface to transition the kinetics of corrosion to an actively corroding state at low relative humidity. This mechanism requires local acidification of the pore solution along portions of the bar where anodic processes are increased due to the presence of chloride and reduced oxygen availability. Reaching this environment requires free OH- to be consumed without replenishment from the surrounding environment by either diffusion from high pH areas or dissolution of the hardened portions of the pore structure. The proposed mechanism begins with corrosion by-products formed when Fe2+ reacts with free OH-, precipitates from the pore solution onto the pore structure as Fe(OH)2. Once precipitated, the contact area between pore solution and hardened portions of the pore structure are reduced which restricts the dissolution process for restoring OH- removed from the electrolyte. Additionally, precipitation of Fe(OH)2 reduces the flow of OH- from the surrounding high pH zones as the pore structure is restricted. Both mechanisms result in a pH gradient being formed with acidified zones created on the bar/concrete interface in the anodic regions. These acidified zones cause the kinetics of corrosion to transition from a passivated state, towards an environment similar to carbonation.

The corrosion of the reinforcing steel in concrete by de-icing salts is one of the major issues concerning the durability of reinforced concrete. Different methods have been used to protect the reinforcing steel, but still corrosion of reinforced structures continues to be a big problem causing enormous costs in their restoration and rehabilitation. The continuity of the pores of concrete plays a crucial role in the corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The ingress of corrosive species, such as chloride ions, oxygen and water, through the pores of the concrete cover cause the breakdown of the passive layer formed on the steel by the high pH of the concrete. The use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in the production of high performance concrete (HPC) improves its resistance to corrosive species as a result of the pozzolanic reaction which forms more calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H). Most of the studies about the corrosion of the reinforcement in HPC have been carried out in sound concrete. However, very few works have been reported on the corrosion of steel in cracked concrete. The crack pattern on HPC is very distinct from that formed on ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete, which may result in different corrosion mechanisms of the reinforcing steel. The objective of the present work consisted in the evaluation of the corrosion of reinforcing steel in cracked HPC and OPC concrete under different exposure and loading conditions. For that purpose, two sets of beams of HPC (containing fly ash or slag) and two sets of OPC concrete were cast. The difference between the OPC concretes was the date of casting. Three sets of reinforcing steel probes were embedded in each beam at different locations. All the beams were cracked at midspan by the four-point method. Eight beams of each concrete were coupled in pairs and partially immersed in a solution of de-icing salts every two weeks. In this way, one set of the corrosion probes was non-submerged (top) while the other two were completely submerged (one at the crack level and the other at the bottom). Two pairs of beams were subjected to static loading whereas the other two were under cyclic loading. The corrosion potentials readings were taken daily by a data acquisition system, whereas the corrosion rates were determined by the Linear Polarization technique using a corrosion monitoring system. According to the results obtained, the corrosion rates of the submerged and non-submerged probes are very low. This behaviour is observed for the four concretes and for both loading conditions. The type of loading did not influence the corrosion rates of these probes, which were in the same range for all the concretes. On the other hand, the probes close to the crack showed higher corrosion rates, especially those under cyclic loading. In general, the OPC concrete cast during the winter presented the highest corrosion rates for both loading conditions, followed by the OPC concrete cast in the summer (as were both HPCs), then by HPC-Slag and HPC-Fly Ash, which showed the lowest values. In most of the cases there was a good agreement between the corrosion potentials and the corrosion rates, so that the OPC concretes exhibited the most negative values. The lower corrosion of the probes in the HPC-Fly Ash and HPC-Slag beams was ascribed to the continued pozzolanic activity, which may result in the self-healing of the crack with time. The probes close to the crack in the dynamically loaded beams experienced higher corrosion than those in the static beams. In some cases the corrosion rate reached values above 100 mm/year. The lower corrosion of the probes in the static beams was attributed to the self-healing of the crack. The formation of additional microcracks in the dynamic beams during cyclic loading may be responsible for their higher corrosion. The corrosion potential of the rebar cage shifted to more negative values during cyclic and static loading. This change in the potential was associated with stress concentration of the reinforcement surface, making it more active. Although the shift in the potential was not really significant, this may have important consequences in practice where the concrete is subjected to higher loads.

Concrete is strong in compression; however, it is quite fragile in tension. To overcome this flaw, concrete is frequently reinforced with bars typically made of low grade, low carbon steel. The environment inside of concrete is favorable for steel; unfortunately when passive steel is exposed to chlorides, active corrosion can initiate, resulting in damage to the structure. One source of chloride contamination is through anti-icing agents which are used to inhibit the formation of ice on roadways, ensuring safe driving conditions. This represents a serious concern from both the cost associated with rehabilitation (Canadian infrastructure deficit in 2003 was $125 billion [1]) and as a safety concern to the public. In Canada, 5 million tonnes of road salts are used each year [2], of which Ontario uses 500 to 600 thousand tonnes [3]. As a result, the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) has requested a study of four frequently used anti-icing agents: 25.5% NaCl, 31.5% MgCl2, 37.9% CaCl2 and 32.6% multi Cl- (12% NaCl, 4% MgCl2 and 16% CaCl2). The objective of the study is two-fold, the first is comparing the effects of the solutions on steel embedded in concrete (high pH environment) and the second is to compare the effects of the anti-icing agents to a variety of construction steels in atmospheric conditions (neutral pH). Macro-cell and micro-cell corrosion in concrete were tested using both modified ASTM G109 prisms and concrete beams with 6 embedded black steel bars. Unfortunately, these tests proved inconclusive; all of the steel remained passive. This was a result of casting a high quality concrete in laboratory conditions which ultimately lead to minimal diffusion of the anti-icing solutions. Therefore, it is recommended that for short term corrosion testing (<2 years), poor quality concrete or cement paste should be used. Micro-cell testing in synthetic concrete pore solution contaminated with the anti-icing solutions was conducted in order to obtain results in the period of the M.A.Sc. program and to directly observe the corrosion. The initial concentration of Cl- in each solution was 0.00% Cl-; this was incrementally increased by 0.005% Cl-/week. Potentiostatic linear polarization to resistance measurements and pH measurements were used to monitor the corrosion on a weekly basis. The results of this test showed that MgCl2 has the most detrimental effects due to the drop in pH (from 13.5 to 9.1) caused by Mg replacing Ca in Ca(OH)2 to form the less soluble Mg(OH)2. The transition from passive to active corrosion initiated at 0.7, 0.4-0.9, 0.6 and 0.6% Cl- for NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2 and multi Cl-, respectively. The active corrosion current densities were 11mA/m2 for NaCl, CaCl2 and multi Cl-, whereas MgCl2 had active corrosion rates of ~100 mA/m2. One bar exposed to CaCl2 showed corrosion rates as high as 600 mA/m2. This was a result of crevice corrosion between the shrink fitting and the rebar. Once the expansive corrosion products broke through the shrink fitting and ample supply of oxygen became available, allowing the corrosion rates to spike dramatically. The following steels were tested directly in the diluted solution in a cyclic corrosion chamber: stainless steels: 304L, 316LM, 2101, 2205, 2304, XM28; corrosion resistant steel reinforcing bars (rebar): galvanized rebar, guard rail (galvanized plate steel) and MMFX; carbon steels: black steel rebar, box girder, drain, weathering steel. The reinforcing bars were virgin steels whereas the remaining steels were components from the field. The testing regime followed SAE J2334 using the anti-icing solutions diluted to 3% by wt. Cl- as the immersion liquid. Unfortunately, the mutli Cl- solution was not tested due to time constraints. The mass change per unit area was measured every five cycles. All stainless steels exposed to all anti-icing solutions exhibited similar changes in mass per unit area, less than 10 g/m2. All plain carbon steels including weathering steel exhibited mass changes per unit area of more than 1000 g/m2 with some variability between the various anti-icing solutions and steel types, although the black steel rebar typically outperformed the other carbon steels. The corrosion products of MMFX were non-adherent, resulting in inconclusive results. The galvanized layer on the guard rail, which had been exposed to the environment in service, proved to be more protective than the fresh zinc coating on the galvanized rebar. When exposed to the MgCl2 solution, the mass change of both new and used galvanized steels was comparable to that found in the stainless steels. When exposed to NaCl solutions, the galvanized guard rail also exhibited this trend, whereas the new galvanic coating did not, suggesting that with exposure to the atmosphere a galvanic coating will protect the steel against NaCl. In all cases galvanized steel exposed to CaCl2 solutions exhibited mass changes per unit area of less than 100 g/m2 this is considered moderate, as this value is one order of magnitude higher than the stainless steels and one order of magnitude lower than the carbon steels exposed to the same test. It is recommended that galvanic coatings be utilized in areas heavily exposed to anti-icing solutions. The weathering steel offers no advantages over carbon steels when directly exposed to anti-icing solutions. Furthermore, in areas with high amounts of exposed galvanized steel, CaCl2 should be avoided. Between the four solutions tested, NaCl solutions are recommended as the anti-icing agents that, overall, causes the least amount of damage to both the reinforcing steel in concrete and to exposed metallic components. NaCl is followed by multi Cl- and CaCl2. Even though MgCl2 causes less damage when directly exposed to carbon steels and galvanized steels than CaCl2, it is much easier to repair external components than internal components. Therefore, MgCl2 is not recommended.

The corrosion of the reinforcing steel in concrete by de-icing salts is one of the major issues concerning the durability of reinforced concrete. Different methods have been used to protect the reinforcing steel, but still corrosion of reinforced structures continues to be a big problem causing enormous costs in their restoration and rehabilitation. The continuity of the pores of concrete plays a crucial role in the corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The ingress of corrosive species, such as chloride ions, oxygen and water, through the pores of the concrete cover cause the breakdown of the passive layer formed on the steel by the high pH of the concrete. The use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in the production of high performance concrete (HPC) improves its resistance to corrosive species as a result of the pozzolanic reaction which forms more calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H). Most of the studies about the corrosion of the reinforcement in HPC have been carried out in sound concrete. However, very few works have been reported on the corrosion of steel in cracked concrete. The crack pattern on HPC is very distinct from that formed on ordinary portland cement (OPC) concrete, which may result in different corrosion mechanisms of the reinforcing steel. The objective of the present work consisted in the evaluation of the corrosion of reinforcing steel in cracked HPC and OPC concrete under different exposure and loading conditions. For that purpose, two sets of beams of HPC (containing fly ash or slag) and two sets of OPC concrete were cast. The difference between the OPC concretes was the date of casting. Three sets of reinforcing steel probes were embedded in each beam at different locations. All the beams were cracked at midspan by the four-point method. Eight beams of each concrete were coupled in pairs and partially immersed in a solution of de-icing salts every two weeks. In this way, one set of the corrosion probes was non-submerged (top) while the other two were completely submerged (one at the crack level and the other at the bottom). Two pairs of beams were subjected to static loading whereas the other two were under cyclic loading. The corrosion potentials readings were taken daily by a data acquisition system, whereas the corrosion rates were determined by the Linear Polarization technique using a corrosion monitoring system. According to the results obtained, the corrosion rates of the submerged and non-submerged probes are very low. This behaviour is observed for the four concretes and for both loading conditions. The type of loading did not influence the corrosion rates of these probes, which were in the same range for all the concretes. On the other hand, the probes close to the crack showed higher corrosion rates, especially those under cyclic loading. In general, the OPC concrete cast during the winter presented the highest corrosion rates for both loading conditions, followed by the OPC concrete cast in the summer (as were both HPCs), then by HPC-Slag and HPC-Fly Ash, which showed the lowest values. In most of the cases there was a good agreement between the corrosion potentials and the corrosion rates, so that the OPC concretes exhibited the most negative values. The lower corrosion of the probes in the HPC-Fly Ash and HPC-Slag beams was ascribed to the continued pozzolanic activity, which may result in the self-healing of the crack with time. The probes close to the crack in the dynamically loaded beams experienced higher corrosion than those in the static beams. In some cases the corrosion rate reached values above 100 mm/year. The lower corrosion of the probes in the static beams was attributed to the self-healing of the crack. The formation of additional microcracks in the dynamic beams during cyclic loading may be responsible for their higher corrosion. The corrosion potential of the rebar cage shifted to more negative values during cyclic and static loading. This change in the potential was associated with stress concentration of the reinforcement surface, making it more active. Although the shift in the potential was not really significant, this may have important consequences in practice where the concrete is subjected to higher loads.

Concrete is strong in compression; however, it is quite fragile in tension. To overcome this flaw, concrete is frequently reinforced with bars typically made of low grade, low carbon steel. The environment inside of concrete is favorable for steel; unfortunately when passive steel is exposed to chlorides, active corrosion can initiate, resulting in damage to the structure. One source of chloride contamination is through anti-icing agents which are used to inhibit the formation of ice on roadways, ensuring safe driving conditions. This represents a serious concern from both the cost associated with rehabilitation (Canadian infrastructure deficit in 2003 was $125 billion [1]) and as a safety concern to the public. In Canada, 5 million tonnes of road salts are used each year [2], of which Ontario uses 500 to 600 thousand tonnes [3]. As a result, the Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO) has requested a study of four frequently used anti-icing agents: 25.5% NaCl, 31.5% MgCl2, 37.9% CaCl2 and 32.6% multi Cl- (12% NaCl, 4% MgCl2 and 16% CaCl2). The objective of the study is two-fold, the first is comparing the effects of the solutions on steel embedded in concrete (high pH environment) and the second is to compare the effects of the anti-icing agents to a variety of construction steels in atmospheric conditions (neutral pH). Macro-cell and micro-cell corrosion in concrete were tested using both modified ASTM G109 prisms and concrete beams with 6 embedded black steel bars. Unfortunately, these tests proved inconclusive; all of the steel remained passive. This was a result of casting a high quality concrete in laboratory conditions which ultimately lead to minimal diffusion of the anti-icing solutions. Therefore, it is recommended that for short term corrosion testing (<2 years), poor quality concrete or cement paste should be used. Micro-cell testing in synthetic concrete pore solution contaminated with the anti-icing solutions was conducted in order to obtain results in the period of the M.A.Sc. program and to directly observe the corrosion. The initial concentration of Cl- in each solution was 0.00% Cl-; this was incrementally increased by 0.005% Cl-/week. Potentiostatic linear polarization to resistance measurements and pH measurements were used to monitor the corrosion on a weekly basis. The results of this test showed that MgCl2 has the most detrimental effects due to the drop in pH (from 13.5 to 9.1) caused by Mg replacing Ca in Ca(OH)2 to form the less soluble Mg(OH)2. The transition from passive to active corrosion initiated at 0.7, 0.4-0.9, 0.6 and 0.6% Cl- for NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2 and multi Cl-, respectively. The active corrosion current densities were 11mA/m2 for NaCl, CaCl2 and multi Cl-, whereas MgCl2 had active corrosion rates of ~100 mA/m2. One bar exposed to CaCl2 showed corrosion rates as high as 600 mA/m2. This was a result of crevice corrosion between the shrink fitting and the rebar. Once the expansive corrosion products broke through the shrink fitting and ample supply of oxygen became available, allowing the corrosion rates to spike dramatically. The following steels were tested directly in the diluted solution in a cyclic corrosion chamber: stainless steels: 304L, 316LM, 2101, 2205, 2304, XM28; corrosion resistant steel reinforcing bars (rebar): galvanized rebar, guard rail (galvanized plate steel) and MMFX; carbon steels: black steel rebar, box girder, drain, weathering steel. The reinforcing bars were virgin steels whereas the remaining steels were components from the field. The testing regime followed SAE J2334 using the anti-icing solutions diluted to 3% by wt. Cl- as the immersion liquid. Unfortunately, the mutli Cl- solution was not tested due to time constraints. The mass change per unit area was measured every five cycles. All stainless steels exposed to all anti-icing solutions exhibited similar changes in mass per unit area, less than 10 g/m2. All plain carbon steels including weathering steel exhibited mass changes per unit area of more than 1000 g/m2 with some variability between the various anti-icing solutions and steel types, although the black steel rebar typically outperformed the other carbon steels. The corrosion products of MMFX were non-adherent, resulting in inconclusive results. The galvanized layer on the guard rail, which had been exposed to the environment in service, proved to be more protective than the fresh zinc coating on the galvanized rebar. When exposed to the MgCl2 solution, the mass change of both new and used galvanized steels was comparable to that found in the stainless steels. When exposed to NaCl solutions, the galvanized guard rail also exhibited this trend, whereas the new galvanic coating did not, suggesting that with exposure to the atmosphere a galvanic coating will protect the steel against NaCl. In all cases galvanized steel exposed to CaCl2 solutions exhibited mass changes per unit area of less than 100 g/m2 this is considered moderate, as this value is one order of magnitude higher than the stainless steels and one order of magnitude lower than the carbon steels exposed to the same test. It is recommended that galvanic coatings be utilized in areas heavily exposed to anti-icing solutions. The weathering steel offers no advantages over carbon steels when directly exposed to anti-icing solutions. Furthermore, in areas with high amounts of exposed galvanized steel, CaCl2 should be avoided. Between the four solutions tested, NaCl solutions are recommended as the anti-icing agents that, overall, causes the least amount of damage to both the reinforcing steel in concrete and to exposed metallic components. NaCl is followed by multi Cl- and CaCl2. Even though MgCl2 causes less damage when directly exposed to carbon steels and galvanized steels than CaCl2, it is much easier to repair external components than internal components. Therefore, MgCl2 is not recommended.

In this investigation, the elasto-plastic behavior and the seismic performance of concrete reinforced frame structures reinforced are evaluated by applying the Pushover method. This evaluation is done on several cases: with high ductility steel (Grade 40), conventional steel (Grade 60) and high strength steel (Grade 75). For the previous, the capacity curve graph obtained from the displacement coefficient method was used to measure the capacity of the structure. In addition, the performance of the structure for different levels of seismic design are evaluated with the resulting values of ductility and rigidity of each case. The results showed that reinforcing a structure with a Grade 40 reinforcing steel increases the energy dissipation capacity, and if reinforced with a Grade 75 reinforcing steel increases the strength capacity in the structure. Finally, the comparative result of the various cases are presented to demonstrate the influence of reinforcing steel on the plastic behavior of concrete reinforced frame structures.

After 17 years in service, a 3 ft by 3 ft closure pour section of an Interstate 81 (I-81) bridge deck failed by punching through near Marion, Virginia. Visual inspection noted that there was considerable corrosion on some of the reinforcing bars in the vicinity of the construction joint, while other failure bars had little or no corrosion. Sections of the bridge deck were cut and delivered to Virginia Tech for further investigation. It was clear from an initial investigation that shrinkage of the deck concrete had caused the construction joints to open and thereby allow water and chlorides to enter the joint. In addition, it was observed that several bars across the closure pour construction joints had suffered significant section loss due to corrosion, but it was not clear if fatigue and strength failure of the reinforcing bars were also contributing factor in the closure pour failure. To study the problem four fatigue tests and five strength tests performed. The specimens included six slab strips cut from the I-81 bridge deck, with the 3-ft closure pour included, and three additional specimens that were cast in the laboratory to represent a base line for performance. A three-point loading setup was used for both fatigue and strength tests. However, for the final strength and fatigue tests, a jacking system was designed and implemented in an effort to open the closure pour construction joints to simulate the open joints of the I-81 bridge. The objectives of this research program are to provide a better understanding of the closure pour failure mechanism, develop inspection procedures for Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to assess its bridge inventory containing similar construction joints, and to develop recommendations for future construction of similar construction joints. / Master of Science