Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-04-23T00:13:57Z No. of bitstreams: 1 RodrigoSantosMagalhaes_DISSERT.pdf: 1447888 bytes, checksum: e70ec6719dcc298445d63da7105699d0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-25T20:21:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 RodrigoSantosMagalhaes_DISSERT.pdf: 1447888 bytes, checksum: e70ec6719dcc298445d63da7105699d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-25T20:21:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 RodrigoSantosMagalhaes_DISSERT.pdf: 1447888 bytes, checksum: e70ec6719dcc298445d63da7105699d0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-04-01 / Este trabalho analisa textos de duas vers?es distintas da B?blia da vertente protestante, a saber: a Almeida, Revista e Corrigida (ARC) e a Nova Tradu??o na Linguagem de Hoje (NTLH). Nesse sentido, investiga as configura??es lingu?stico-textuais dessas vers?es, com o objetivo de identificar diferen?as consider?veis entre elas e implica??es na atribui??o de sentido de uma e de outra. A B?blia ? um livro com influ?ncia hist?rica e sua import?ncia n?o se limita somente ? esfera religiosa, sendo tamb?m considerada, por muitos, como uma obra de alto valor liter?rio. Ela continua em plena e ampla circula??o no contexto hist?rico-religioso-cultural do mundo de hoje. Al?m disso, esse livro re?ne aspectos discursivos e lingu?stico-textuais importantes a serem investigados, especialmente, se considerado o fato de podermos confrontar suas diferentes tradu??es. Das duas vers?es b?blicas (ARC e NTLH), interessam-nos particularmente tr?s g?neros discursivos distintos (poema, par?bola e ep?stola), sendo cinco textos de cada vers?o, o que resulta num total de dez textos. A esse respeito, consideramos, ainda, as variadas sequ?ncias tipol?gicas envolvidas na organiza??o dos g?neros discursivos selecionados, observando se a predomin?ncia de uma dessas sequ?ncias implica maior ou menor facilidade/dificuldade de compreens?o. Utilizamos, tamb?m, como suporte de an?lise, protocolos de leitura de informantes diversificados, levando em considera??o o credo religioso, o grau de escolaridade e a faixa et?ria, a fim de verificar se as diferen?as formais dos textos escolhidos e o perfil social dos leitores motivam poss?veis altera??es no processo de compreens?o textual. Para a realiza??o da an?lise, tomamos como suporte te?rico-metodol?gico a Lingu?stica Funcional Centrada no Uso (ou Lingu?stica Cognitivo-Funcional), a qual aglutina contribui??es da tradi??o funcionalista norte-americana e da Lingu?stica Cognitiva. / This paper analyses the texts of two distinct versions of the protestant Bible, namely: Almeida, Revista e Corrigida (ARC) and Nova Tradu??o na Linguagem de Hoje (NTLH). In this sense, it investigates the linguistic-textual configurations of such versions with the aim of identifying relevant differences between them and the implications for attribution of meaning between the first and the latter. The Bible is a book of historic influence and its importance is not limited only to the religious realm, but is also considered by many as a work of high literary value. It currently remains in full and wide circulation in the historic, religious and cultural contexts. Furthermore, this book gathers important discursive and textual-linguistic aspects worthy of investigation, especially, if the fact of contrasting its different versions is considered. From the two biblical versions (ARC and NTLH), three distinct discursive genres are of interest (poem, parable and epistle), with five texts from each version, resulting in a total of ten texts. In this sense, we are also interested in the various typological sequences involved in the organization of the discursive genres selected, observing if the predominance of such sequences implies in greater or lesser facility/difficulty of comprehension. We also utilized as a support for analysis the reading protocols of diverse informants, taking into consideration the religious beliefs, the level of education and age, with an aim to verify if the formal differences of the selected texts and the social profile of readers could cause possible changes to the process of text comprehension. To carry out the analysis, we used Usage-Based Linguistics (or Cognitive-Functional Linguistics) as a theoreticalmethodological support, which encompasses contributions from the North American functional tradition and cognitive linguistics.