Bacteriophage ë has been used as a model replicon system for forty years. While the basic ë replication initiation scheme has been elucidated for several decades, many aspects of the mechanisms are unclear. I wished to study two unanswered issues in ë replication initiation. </p><p>Replication initiation of E. coli and ë each depend upon a protein generally called a licensing factor, which brings the DnaB helicase protein to the origin site to begin DNA synthesis. The licensing factors are the products of host gene dnaC and ë gene P. The synthesis of P from ë DNA in an E. coli cell can competitively interfere with DnaC activity needed for E. coli replication initiation. I wished to learn more about what happens to a host cell when exposed to extended P expression. Previous studies in this laboratory suggested that i) the continuous expression of P was tolerated by a subset of exposed cells and that ii) host defects mapping to dnaB could suppress the effect of extended P expression (P-lethality). I used DNA sequencing to determine if these suppressor mutations were within dnaB. I screened known host mutations for their influence on P-lethality. In summary: E. coli strains with GrpD55 and GrpA80 defects were found to each have two point mutations within their dnaB genes. I was unable to isolate mutations within P that suppressed P-lethality and instead obtained regulatory mutations preventing wild type P expression. Two of these sequenced mutations showed that a cI[Ts] lambda repressor was reverted to cI wild type, blocking P expression at all assay temperatures. P-lethality was reversible in cells exposed to P for up to five hours, causing me to suggest that P-Interference be used in place of the term P-lethality. A non-inducible allele of lexA prevented P-mediated cellular filamentation and enhanced P-Interference. This suggests that induction of the SOS response helps cells to tolerate extended P expression. A host strain containing a defective ClpXP protease significantly enhanced cellular sensitivity to P-Interference. This suggests an important role for the ClpXP chaperone-protease complex in degradation of P and cellular resistance to P expression. I present models to explain the P-Interference Phenotype.</p><p>Recent reports have re-opened the possibility that the tO-oop-pO element influences ë DNA replication initiation. I have also been investigating this possibility. I found that a plasmid with tO-oop-pO (the terminator, nucleotide sequence and promoter for OOP RNA) and orië DNA sequence was inhibitory to the development of repë phages, and designated this the Inhibition Phenotype (IP). In pursuing the mechanism for this inhibition, I mutated the tO-oop-pO and orië elements. I found that the expression of the 77nt OOP RNA transcript and the presence of four 18 base pair repeats (iterons) within orië were required for the IP. I isolated spontaneous phage mutants, resistant to the IP. I determined that singly infected cells were sensitive to the IP but that multiply infected cells escaped the IP. I propose that the IP to repë phage development is directed to the initial or theta mode of ë replication initiation. I found that the theta-mode of ë replication initiation can be bypassed, likely via recombination between multiple phage genomes within a singe cell. I propose models to explain the IP and also suggest a role for OOP RNA in the regulation of ë DNA replication.

The hepatitis delta virus (HDV), composed of ~1,700nt, is the smallest circular RNA pathogen known to infect humans. Understanding the mode of replication of HDV implies on investigating the host proteins that bind to its genome. The polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor (PSF), an HDV interacting protein, was found to interact with the carboxy terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II (RNAPII), and to facilitate the interaction of RNA transcripts with the CTD of RNAPII. Both PSF and RNAPII were found to interact with both polarities of the terminal stem loop domains of HDV RNA, which possess RNA promoter activity in vitro. Furthermore, PSF and RNAPII were found to simultaneously interact with HDV RNA in vitro. Together, the above experiments suggest that PSF acts as a transcription factor during HDV RNA replication by interacting with both the CTD of RNAPII and HDV RNA simultaneously. PSF knockdown experiments were performed to indicate that PSF is required for HDV RNA accumulation. Mutagenesis experiments of PSF revealed that HDV RNA accumulation might require the N terminal domain, and the RNA recognition motifs RRM1 and RRM2. I propose that the RRM1 and RRM2 domains might interact with HDV RNA, while the N-terminal domain might interact with the CTD of RNAPII for HDV RNA accumulation. Together, the above experiments provide a better understanding of how an RNA promoter might be recognized by RNAPII.

Initiation of DNA replication requires the action of the Dbf4/Cdc7 kinase complex (DDK) which is also a phosphorylation target of Rad53 kinase in the S-phase checkpoint. DDK is thought to trigger DNA replication by phosphorylating members of the Mcm2-7 complex present at origins of replication. While DDK phosphorylation sites have been identified on Mcm2-7, the contributions made by Dbf4 and Cdc7 to the targeting of the complex have not been established. DDK has also been implicated in the S-phase checkpoint response since it is removed from chromatin in a Rad53-dependent manner. The interaction of Dbf4 and Cdc7 with each of the Mcm2-7 subunits was assessed and showed an interaction between Dbf4 and Mcm2 and Mcm6, while interactions between Cdc7 and Mcm4 and Mcm5 were observed. Mutations in Mcm2 and Mcm4 that disrupt the interactions with Dbf4 or Cdc7 showed modest growth impairment and compromised DNA replication, while simultaneous abrogation of both interactions resulted in lethality. Strains overexpressing Mcm2 or Mcm4 were sensitive to genotoxic agents, while overexpression of Mcm2 in a Mcm4Δ175-333 strain background resulted in a severe growth impairment as well as sensitivity to genotoxic stress. ChIP analysis revealed the possibility of Dbf4/Cdc7 localization to origin flanking regions through most of S-phase, which may redistribute to origins at the time of firing. Fluorescence microscopy of Mcm2 and Dbf4 in S-phase seem to show a punctate pattern of staining, consistent with these factors’ localization to ‘replication factories.’ By using a Dbf4ΔN mutant, the N-motif was shown to be required for the Rad53-mediated removal of Dbf4 from chromatin under checkpoint conditions. Initial optimization of a DNA combing protocol was also performed, which along with Dbf4ΔN mutant and the fluorescently-epitope tagged strains, will be useful tools for evaluating a role for DDK in the S-phase checkpoint response. Altered levels of DNA replication factors have been implicated in many human cancers. The data presented in this study provide novel insight into the normal process of the initiation of DNA replication which can be applied to research involving higher eukaryotes, including humans, and can serve as a benchmark for comparison with the cancer phenotype.

The heterohexameric origin recognition complex (ORC) acts as a scaffold for the G1 phase assembly of pre-replicative complexes. Only the Orc1-5 subunits are required for origin binding in budding yeast, yet Orc6 is an essential protein for cell proliferation. In comparison to other eukaryotic Orc6 proteins, budding yeast Orc6 appears to be quite divergent. Two-hybrid analysis revealed that Orc6 only weakly interacts with other ORC subunits. In this assay Orc6 showed a strong ability to self-associate, although the significance of this dimerization or multimerization remains unclear. Imaging of Orc6-eYFP revealed a punctate sub-nuclear localization pattern throughout the cell cycle, representing the first visualization of replication foci in live budding yeast cells. Orc6 was not detected at the site of division between mother and daughter cells, in contrast to observations from metazoans. An essential role for Orc6 in DNA replication was identified by depleting the protein before and during G1 phase. Surprisingly, Orc6 was required for entry into S phase after pre-replicative complex formation, in contrast to what has been observed for other ORC subunits. When Orc6 was depleted in late G1, Mcm2 and Mcm10 were displaced from chromatin, the efficiency of replication origin firing was severely compromised, and cells failed to progress through S phase. Depletion of Orc6 late in the cell cycle indicated that it was not required for mitosis or cytokinesis. However, Orc6 was shown to be associated with proteins involved in regulating these processes, suggesting that it may act as a signal to mark the completion of DNA replication and allow mitosis to commence.

The heterohexameric origin recognition complex (ORC) acts as a scaffold for the G1 phase assembly of pre-replicative complexes. Only the Orc1-5 subunits are required for origin binding in budding yeast, yet Orc6 is an essential protein for cell proliferation. In comparison to other eukaryotic Orc6 proteins, budding yeast Orc6 appears to be quite divergent. Two-hybrid analysis revealed that Orc6 only weakly interacts with other ORC subunits. In this assay Orc6 showed a strong ability to self-associate, although the significance of this dimerization or multimerization remains unclear. Imaging of Orc6-eYFP revealed a punctate sub-nuclear localization pattern throughout the cell cycle, representing the first visualization of replication foci in live budding yeast cells. Orc6 was not detected at the site of division between mother and daughter cells, in contrast to observations from metazoans. An essential role for Orc6 in DNA replication was identified by depleting the protein before and during G1 phase. Surprisingly, Orc6 was required for entry into S phase after pre-replicative complex formation, in contrast to what has been observed for other ORC subunits. When Orc6 was depleted in late G1, Mcm2 and Mcm10 were displaced from chromatin, the efficiency of replication origin firing was severely compromised, and cells failed to progress through S phase. Depletion of Orc6 late in the cell cycle indicated that it was not required for mitosis or cytokinesis. However, Orc6 was shown to be associated with proteins involved in regulating these processes, suggesting that it may act as a signal to mark the completion of DNA replication and allow mitosis to commence.

Bacteriophage ë has been used as a model replicon system for forty years. While the basic ë replication initiation scheme has been elucidated for several decades, many aspects of the mechanisms are unclear. I wished to study two unanswered issues in ë replication initiation. </p><p>Replication initiation of E. coli and ë each depend upon a protein generally called a licensing factor, which brings the DnaB helicase protein to the origin site to begin DNA synthesis. The licensing factors are the products of host gene dnaC and ë gene P. The synthesis of P from ë DNA in an E. coli cell can competitively interfere with DnaC activity needed for E. coli replication initiation. I wished to learn more about what happens to a host cell when exposed to extended P expression. Previous studies in this laboratory suggested that i) the continuous expression of P was tolerated by a subset of exposed cells and that ii) host defects mapping to dnaB could suppress the effect of extended P expression (P-lethality). I used DNA sequencing to determine if these suppressor mutations were within dnaB. I screened known host mutations for their influence on P-lethality. In summary: E. coli strains with GrpD55 and GrpA80 defects were found to each have two point mutations within their dnaB genes. I was unable to isolate mutations within P that suppressed P-lethality and instead obtained regulatory mutations preventing wild type P expression. Two of these sequenced mutations showed that a cI[Ts] lambda repressor was reverted to cI wild type, blocking P expression at all assay temperatures. P-lethality was reversible in cells exposed to P for up to five hours, causing me to suggest that P-Interference be used in place of the term P-lethality. A non-inducible allele of lexA prevented P-mediated cellular filamentation and enhanced P-Interference. This suggests that induction of the SOS response helps cells to tolerate extended P expression. A host strain containing a defective ClpXP protease significantly enhanced cellular sensitivity to P-Interference. This suggests an important role for the ClpXP chaperone-protease complex in degradation of P and cellular resistance to P expression. I present models to explain the P-Interference Phenotype.</p><p>Recent reports have re-opened the possibility that the tO-oop-pO element influences ë DNA replication initiation. I have also been investigating this possibility. I found that a plasmid with tO-oop-pO (the terminator, nucleotide sequence and promoter for OOP RNA) and orië DNA sequence was inhibitory to the development of repë phages, and designated this the Inhibition Phenotype (IP). In pursuing the mechanism for this inhibition, I mutated the tO-oop-pO and orië elements. I found that the expression of the 77nt OOP RNA transcript and the presence of four 18 base pair repeats (iterons) within orië were required for the IP. I isolated spontaneous phage mutants, resistant to the IP. I determined that singly infected cells were sensitive to the IP but that multiply infected cells escaped the IP. I propose that the IP to repë phage development is directed to the initial or theta mode of ë replication initiation. I found that the theta-mode of ë replication initiation can be bypassed, likely via recombination between multiple phage genomes within a singe cell. I propose models to explain the IP and also suggest a role for OOP RNA in the regulation of ë DNA replication.

None

none

<p>To achieve better scalability, a fully replicated, distributed, main-memory database is divided into subparts, called segments. Segments may have individual degrees of redundancy and other properties that can be used for replication control. Segmentation is examined for the opportunity of decreasing replication effort, lower memory requirements and decrease node recovery times. Typical usage scenarios are distributed databases with many nodes where only a small number of the nodes share information. We present a framework for virtual full replication that implements segments with scheduled replication of updates between sharing nodes.</p><p>Selective replication control needs information about the application semantics that is specified using segment properties, which includes consistency classes and other properties. We define a syntax for specifying the application semantics and segment properties for the segmented database. In particular, properties of segments that are subject to hard real-time constraints must be specified. We also analyze the potential improvements for such an architecture.</p>

<p>Distributed real-time database systems demand consistency and timeliness. One approach for this problem is eventual consistency which guarantees local consistency within predictable time. Global consistency can be reached by best effort mechanisms but for some scenarios, e.g. an alarm signal, this may not be suffcient. Bounded delay replication, which provides global consistency in bounded time, ensures that after the local commit of a transaction updates are propagated to and integrated at any remote node within bounded time. The DRTS group at the University of Skövde is working on a project called DeeDS, which is a distributed real-time database prototype. In this prototype, eventual consistency with as</p><p>soon as possible (ASAP) replication is implemented. The goal of this dissertation is to further develop replication in this prototype in coexistence to the existing eventual consistency which implies the extension of both the theory and the implementation.</p><p>The main issue with bounded time replication is to make all parts, which are involved in the replication process predictable and simultaneously support eventual consistency with as soon as possible replication.</p>