• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Efeitos de manipula??es ascendentes e descendentes sobre a comunidade fitoplanct?nica em um reservat?rio eutr?fico no semi-?rido brasileiro

Dantas, Danyhelton Douglas Farias 30 April 2009 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:01:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DanyheltonDFD.pdf: 1227676 bytes, checksum: c8754b4250e0bb6e5391c5ffbe8423a3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009-04-30 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / Top-down (grazing) and bottom-up (nutrient, light) controls are important in freshwater ecosystems regulation. Relative importance of these factors could change in space and time, but in tropical lakes bottom-up regulation has to been appointed as more influent. Present study aimed to test the hypothesis that phytoplankton growths rate in Armando Ribeiro reservoir, a huge eutrophic reservoir in semi-arid region of Rio Grande do Norte state, is more limited by nutrient available then zooplankton grazing pressure. Bioassay was conduced monthly from September (2008) to August (2009) manipulating two levels of nutrients (with/without addition) and two level of grazers (with/without removal). Experimental design was factorial 2X2 with four treatments (X5), (i) control with water and zooplankton from natural spot ( C ), (ii) with nutrient addition ( +NP ), (iii) with zooplankton remove ( -Z ) and (iv) with zooplankton remove and nutrient addition ( -Z+NP ). For bioassay confection transparent plastic bottles (500ml) was incubate for 4 or 5 days in two different depths, Secchi`s depth (high luminosity) and 3 times Secchi`s depth (low luminosity). Water samples were collected from each bottle in begins and after incubates period for chlorophyll a concentration analysis and zoopalnktonic organisms density. Phytoplankton growths rates were calculated. Bifactorial ANOVA was performance to test if had a significant effect (p<0,005) of nutrient addition and grazers remove as well a significant interaction between factors on phytoplankton growths rates. Effect magnitude was calculated the relative importance of each process. Results show that phytoplankton growth was in generally stimulated by nutrient addition, as while zooplankton remove rarely stimulated phytoplankton growth. Some significant interactions happening between nutrient additions and grazers remove on phytoplankton growth. In conclusion this study suggests that in studied reservoir phytoplankton growth is more controlled by ascendent factors than descendent / A produ??o prim?ria dos ecossistemas aqu?ticos ? regulada por fatores ascendentes, (disponibilidade de luz e nutrientes), e por fatores descendentes (herbivoria). A import?ncia relativa desses fatores pode variar no tempo e no espa?o, mas em lagos tropicais tem sido sugerido que os fatores ascendentes s?o geralmente mais importantes. O presente estudo teve como principal objetivo testar a hip?tese de que o crescimento fitoplanct?nico no reservat?rio Armando Ribeiro Gon?alves, um grande reservat?rio eutr?fico na regi?o semi-?rida do Rio Grande do Norte, ? mais limitado pela disponibilidade de nutrientes do que pela press?o de herbivoria do zoopl?ncton. Bioensaios foram realizados mensalmente entre Setembro (2007) e Agosto (2008), manipulando-se dois n?veis de nutrientes (com/sem adi??o) e dois n?veis de herb?voros (com/sem remo??o). O desenho experimental foi do tipo fatorial 2X2 com quatro tratamentos (x5), (i) controle contendo a ?gua e o pl?ncton natural do ambiente ( C ), (ii) com adi??o de nutrientes ( +NP ), (iii) com remo??o de zoopl?ncton ( -Z ) e (iv) com remo??o de zoopl?ncton e adi??o de nutrientes ( -Z+NP ). Nos bioensaios foram incubadas garrafas pl?sticas transparentes de 500 mL por 4 ou 5 dias em duas profundidades distintas: na profundidade do disco de Secchi (alta luminosidade) e em uma profundidade 3x maior do que a anterior (baixa luminosidade). Amostras de ?gua foram coletadas de cada garrafa no inicio e ap?s o per?odo de incuba??o para an?lises das concentra??es de clorofila a e densidades de organismos zooplanct?nicos. Foi calculada a taxa de crescimento fitoplanct?nico. Uma ANOVA bifatorial foi realizada para testar se houve efeito significativo (p<0,05) da adi??o de nutrientes e da remo??o de herb?voros bem como uma intera??o significativa entre ambos os fatores sobre as taxa de crescimento do fitopl?ncton. A magnitude de cada efeito tamb?m foi calculada para quantificar a import?ncia relativa de cada processo. Os resultados mostram que o crescimento fitoplanct?nico foi geralmente estimulado pela adi??o de nutrientes enquanto a remo??o do zoopl?ncton raramente estimulou o crescimento fitoplanct?nico. Algumas intera??es significativas ocorreram entre os efeitos da adi??o de nutrientes e da remo??o de herb?voros sobre o crescimento fitoplanct?nico. Como conclus?o, esta pesquisa sugere que o crescimento fitoplanct?nico no reservat?rio estudado, ? mais fortemente controlado por fatores ascendentes do que por fatores descendentes

Page generated in 0.0854 seconds