Spelling suggestions: "subject:"desponse consistency."" "subject:"coresponse consistency.""
1 |
The perception of two indicators that change in timeBenne, Marcie 05 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
The nonconstancy of response: effects of control multiplexity, stimulus and response uncertainty, response alternatives, and label compatibility on the latency distributionBirdwell, Gerald Gordon 08 1900 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
An analysis of response-contingent light change reinforcementRussell, Alan January 1971 (has links)
v, 275 leaves : appendices / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.1972) from the Dept. of Psychology, University of Adelaide
|
4 |
An analysis of response-contingent light change reinforcement.Russell, Alan. January 1971 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (Ph.D. 1972) from the Dept. of Psychology, University of Adelaide.
|
5 |
Persistence of response variation and repetitionDoughty, Adam H. January 2000 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--West Virginia University, 2000. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains iii, 46 p. : ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 41-46).
|
6 |
Sensitivity to molar contingencies of food presentationEverly, Jeffrey. January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--West Virginia University, 2004. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vi, 54 p. : ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references.
|
7 |
The response switching effect.Barnes, Heather J. 01 January 1988 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
8 |
Confounding variables in the discriminated Irt procedure.Palmer, David C. 01 January 1983 (has links) (PDF)
When discriminated IRT procedures have been used to determine preference relations among temporally extended operants, deviations from predictions of the matching law have been found (Hawkes and Shimp, 1974). Using a yoked-control procedure, the present study shows that keypecking in the discriminated IRT procedure has two sources of strength, that arising from the stimulus-reinforcer contingency and that arising from the response-reinforcer contingency Three out of four yoked birds autoshaped to the keylight, and all lead birds showed evidence of control by the keylight under some conditions. As any control of keypecking by the keylight, either discriminated or autoshaped, contributes to deviations from matching, the discriminated IRT procedure does not permit one to draw strong conclusions about preference relations among IRTs.
|
9 |
The ability to generate or inhibit responses after frontal lobectomy /Miller, Laurie Ann January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Differential reinforcement of fixed-interval interresponse times effects on choice /Wade, Tammy R. January 2002 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--West Virginia University, 2002. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vii, 30 p. : ill. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 30).
|
Page generated in 0.0992 seconds