Thesis (Ph.D.)--Kent State University, 2007. / Title from PDF t.p. (viewed June 1, 2007). Advisors: Dimiter Dimitrov, Shawn Fitzgerald. Keywords: Item response theory, true score theory, reliability, measurement of change, NELS:88 Includes bibliographical references (p. 58-62).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Georgia State University, 2007. / Title from file title page. Carolyn F. Furlow , committee chair; Phillip Gagne, T. Chris Oshima, Valerie A. Miller, committee members. Electronic text (113 p. : ill.) : digital, PDF file. Description based on contents viewed June 24, 2008. Includes bibliographical references (p. 93-100).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Michigan State University. Measurement and Quantitative Methods, 2008. / Title from PDF t.p. (Proquest, viewed on Aug. 20, 2009) Includes bibliographical references (p. 96-101). Also issued in print.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of North Texas, Dec., 2008. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2008. / Title from title screen (site viewed Nov. 25, 2008). PDF text:vii, 125 p. : ill. ; 29 Mb. UMI publication number: AAT 3317288. Includes bibliographical references. Also available in microfilm and microfiche formats.

Thesis advisor: Walter Vispoel, Won-Chan Lee. Includes bibliographic references (p. 204-209).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 116-120).

abstract: Item response theory (IRT) and related latent variable models represent modern psychometric theory, the successor to classical test theory in psychological assessment. While IRT has become prevalent in the assessment of ability and achievement, it has not been widely embraced by clinical psychologists. This appears due, in part, to psychometrists' use of unidimensional models despite evidence that psychiatric disorders are inherently multidimensional. The construct validity of unidimensional and multidimensional latent variable models was compared to evaluate the utility of modern psychometric theory in clinical assessment. Archival data consisting of 688 outpatients' presenting concerns, psychiatric diagnoses, and item level responses to the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) were extracted from files at a university mental health clinic. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that models with oblique factors and/or item cross-loadings better represented the internal structure of the BSI in comparison to a strictly unidimensional model. The models were generally equivalent in their ability to account for variance in criterion-related validity variables; however, bifactor models demonstrated superior validity in differentiating between mood and anxiety disorder diagnoses. Multidimensional IRT analyses showed that the orthogonal bifactor model partitioned distinct, clinically relevant sources of item variance. Similar results were also achieved through multivariate prediction with an oblique simple structure model. Receiver operating characteristic curves confirmed improved sensitivity and specificity through multidimensional models of psychopathology. Clinical researchers are encouraged to consider these and other comprehensive models of psychological distress. / Dissertation/Thesis / Ph.D. Psychology 2011

The purpose of this study was to develop a core HIV/AIDS knowledge assessment (CHAKA) for students enrolled in counseling-related degree programs. Although there are studies that examined counseling HIV/AIDS knowledge, the instruments that were used were limited in ways that may compromise the accuracy of the inferences that were made. This study was carried out in three phases. Phase 1 involved developing an initial pool of items; Phase 2 involved an expert review for content validation as well as a pilot-test; Phase 3 involved field testing the CHAKA. The field-test involved 343 undergraduate and graduate students at Southern Illinois University. Item response theory (IRT) was used to analyze the data. Before the data were analyzed, they were examined to see if the CHAKA was a unidimensional test. Results of the factor analysis performed was that the CHAKA may not be unidimensional; however the internal consistency was decent (α= .734). A two-parameter logistic (2PL) model was fit to the data. Results from the item parameter estimates displayed relatively low discrimination and difficulty parameters in addition to some problematic items (i.e., negative discrimination estimates, unusually large difficulty values). Additional analyses revealed that locally dependent items may have accounted for the possible multidimensionality, low discrimination indices, and inflated difficulty values. The low discrimination values likely affected the information values of the items and the test. All item information values were less than 1. Last, both uniform and non-uniform differential item functioning (DIF) was present between undergraduate and graduate students. IRT appears to be a promising approach to instrument development in counseling-related programs. Although the CHAKA properties were not ideal, further revisions and a larger sample size may contribute to the overall improvement of this instrument.

This thesis sought to address the application of non-parametric item response theory (NIRT) to cognitive and functional assessment in dementia. Performance on psychometric tests is key to diagnosis and monitoring of dementia. NIRT can be used to improve the psychometric properties of tests used in dementia assessment in multiple ways: confirming an underlying unidimensional structure, establishing formal item hierarchical patterns of decline, increasing insight by examining item parameters such as difficulty and discrimination, and creating shorter tests. From a NIRT approach item difficulty refers to the ease with which an item is endorsed. Discrimination is an index of how well an item can differentiate between patients of varying levels of severity. Firstly I carried out a systematic review to identify applications of both parametric and non-parametric IRT to measures assessing global cognitive functioning in people with dementia. This review demonstrated that IRT can increase the interpretive power of cognitive assessment scales and confirmed the limited number of IRT analyses of cognitive scales in dementia populations. This thesis extended this approach by applying Mokken scaling analysis to commonly used measures of current cognitive ability (Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R)) and of premorbid cognitive ability (National Adult Reading Test (NART)). Differential item functioning (DIF) by diagnosis identified slight variations in the patterns of hierarchical decline in the ACE-R. These disease-specific sequences of decline could serve as an adjunct to diagnosis, for example where learning a name and address is a more difficult task than being orientated in time, late onset Alzheimer’s disease is a more probable diagnosis than mixed Alzheimer’s and vascular dementia. These analyses also allowed key items to be identified which can be used to create briefer scales (mini-ACE and Mini-NART) which have good psychometric properties. These scales are clinically relevant, comprising highly discriminatory, invariantly ordered items. They also allow sensitive measurement and adaptive testing and can reduce test administration time and patient stress. Impairment of functional abilities represents a crucial component of dementia diagnosis with performance on these functional tasks predictive of overall disease. A second aspect of this thesis, therefore, was the application of Mokken scaling analyses to measures of functional decline in dementia, specifically the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale and Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS). While gender DIF was observed for several items, implying the likelihood of equal responses from men and women is not equal a generally consistent pattern of impairment in functional ability was observed across different types of dementia.