As a result of the change of financial environment, the competition of domestic banking industry has become more intense, and its management has also met the challenge. In order to grow the operating activities, the bank of Taiwan become less dependent on traditional deposit and loan activities and then turns to develop the non-traditional activities. Therefore the non-interest income increases year by year and the development of operating activities diversification has become the main business model to promote the profit. Based on the above reason, the study use the market and account data of listed banks from 1991 to 2009 to investigate the impact of operating activities diversification on the risk and performance of banks. The result of the empirical analysis by the accounting data shows that the higher degree of operating activities diversification can reduce the bank risk, but the performance is not actually good. When the bank develops the operating activities diversification by increasing the non-interest income, the risk will be getting higher but the performance will be getting better. Therefore, the banking industry can¡¦t put too much stress on the non-interest income. It should make the adequate decision between the risk and the performance. On the other hand, the result of the empirical analysis by the market data shows that the higher degree of operating activities diversification can increase the fluctuation of the stock price and when the non-interest income increases, Tobin's Q value gets higher. It demonstrated that the investors of the stock market anticipated the bank can improve the performance by increasing the non-interest income activities and gives recognition.

Increasing sophistication of exchange traded fund (ETF) indexation methods required that a comparison be drawn between various methodologies. A performance and risk evaluation of four pre-selected ETF indexation categories were conducted to establish the diversification benefits that each contain. Fundamentally weighted, equally weighted and leveraged ETFs were compared to traditional market capitalisation weighted ETFs on the basis of risk and return. While a literature review presented the theory on ETFs and the various statistical measures used for this study, the main findings were obtained empirically from a sample of South African and American ETFs. Several risk-adjusted performance measures were employed to assess the risk and return of each indexation category. Special emphasis was placed on the Omega ratio due to the unique interpretation of the return series‟ distribution characteristics. The risk of each ETF category was evaluated using the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA), while the diversification potential was determined by means of a regression analysis based on the single index model. According to the findings, fundamentally weighted ETFs perform the best during an upward moving market when compared by standard risk-adjusted performance measures. However, the Omega ratio analysis revealed the inherent unsystematic risk of alternatively indexed ETFs and ranked market capitalisation weighted ETFs as the best performing category. Equal weighted ETFs delivered consistently poor rankings, while leveraged ETFs exhibited a high level of risk associated with the amplified returns of this category. The diversification measurement concurred with the Omega ratio analysis and highlighted the market capitalisation weighted ETFs to be the most diversified ETFs in the selection. Alternatively indexed ETFs consequently deliver higher absolute returns by incurring greater unsystematic risk, while simultaneously reducing the level of diversification in the fund. / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2014

Increasing sophistication of exchange traded fund (ETF) indexation methods required that a comparison be drawn between various methodologies. A performance and risk evaluation of four pre-selected ETF indexation categories were conducted to establish the diversification benefits that each contain. Fundamentally weighted, equally weighted and leveraged ETFs were compared to traditional market capitalisation weighted ETFs on the basis of risk and return. While a literature review presented the theory on ETFs and the various statistical measures used for this study, the main findings were obtained empirically from a sample of South African and American ETFs. Several risk-adjusted performance measures were employed to assess the risk and return of each indexation category. Special emphasis was placed on the Omega ratio due to the unique interpretation of the return series‟ distribution characteristics. The risk of each ETF category was evaluated using the exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA), while the diversification potential was determined by means of a regression analysis based on the single index model. According to the findings, fundamentally weighted ETFs perform the best during an upward moving market when compared by standard risk-adjusted performance measures. However, the Omega ratio analysis revealed the inherent unsystematic risk of alternatively indexed ETFs and ranked market capitalisation weighted ETFs as the best performing category. Equal weighted ETFs delivered consistently poor rankings, while leveraged ETFs exhibited a high level of risk associated with the amplified returns of this category. The diversification measurement concurred with the Omega ratio analysis and highlighted the market capitalisation weighted ETFs to be the most diversified ETFs in the selection. Alternatively indexed ETFs consequently deliver higher absolute returns by incurring greater unsystematic risk, while simultaneously reducing the level of diversification in the fund. / MCom (Risk Management), North-West University, Vaal Triangle Campus, 2014

<p>The review of the ethical funds literature shows the significant growth of the Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) in the last few decades. The increase of the interest towards SRI indicates that ethical issues have become more essential for the investors. However the number of surveys reveals that financial performance remains of an important concern for the socially responsible investors. Therefore the benchmark analysis of the expected returns and management fees of the ethical mutual funds is chosen as a topic for this thesis research. The risk-adjusted measures are used to analyze and compare the performance of the ethical and non-ethical mutual funds in United Kingdom. The analysis does not indicate the significant difference in the expected returns between the two groups of funds. However this study concludes that on average ethical funds charge higher management fees. Thus investing in ethical funds is more costly but gives about the same returns as investing in conventional funds.</p>

This paper aims to examine if firms listed on Nasdaq Stockholm with dividend exposure yield higher risk-adjusted returns than firms without dividend exposure. Using a data set consisting of observations between 2000-2017 we test the difference in mean risk-adjusted return, measured by the Sharpe ratio, between securities with different levels of dividend exposure. We divide our sample into portfolios, categorized in the first stage independently of investment style, size and book-to-market ratio, and in the second stage on dividend exposure, that are regrouped annually. We measure the performance in terms of the geometric mean monthly returns, the risk as standard deviation of returns and the risk-adjusted performance measured with the Sharpe ratio. Following our empirical study, we find indications of a value effect in the Swedish capital market and draw upon three main conclusions. First, for all but one portfolio, the risk decreases with an increased degree of dividend exposure. Second, securities with high-dividend exposure tend to yield higher risk-adjusted returns relative to securities with no-dividend exposure. Third, the effect of dividend exposure on risk-adjusted performance appears to be most significant on mid firms and growth firms

No description available.

The review of the ethical funds literature shows the significant growth of the Socially Responsible Investments (SRI) in the last few decades. The increase of the interest towards SRI indicates that ethical issues have become more essential for the investors. However the number of surveys reveals that financial performance remains of an important concern for the socially responsible investors. Therefore the benchmark analysis of the expected returns and management fees of the ethical mutual funds is chosen as a topic for this thesis research. The risk-adjusted measures are used to analyze and compare the performance of the ethical and non-ethical mutual funds in United Kingdom. The analysis does not indicate the significant difference in the expected returns between the two groups of funds. However this study concludes that on average ethical funds charge higher management fees. Thus investing in ethical funds is more costly but gives about the same returns as investing in conventional funds.

The supply of ethical funds has increased greatly in Sweden during recent years. The purpose of the thesis is to examine how ethical these funds really are and further-more investigate their financial development. The investment criteria’s for ethical mutual funds that are managed by Swedish companies and institutes are analysed and compared. A content analysis over every fund’s holdings has been done in order to see to what extent they live up to their own ethical standards and to what degree they differ from other mutual funds. The analysis of the ethical funds financial development have been done over the pe-riod 2003-03-31 – 2006-03-31 and financial measures such as Sharpe, M2 RAP and Jensen’s alpha are used. In addition, the fees of the funds are compared, both with each other and with other funds of similar character. The results of the analysis show that the majority of the ethical funds cannot be treated as more ethical than other funds. Regardless of their similarity to other funds they have a slightly worse risk ad-justed performance development than index. So despite the fact that the funds are more or less identical to other funds from an investment perspective the outcome will be higher risk exposing and/or lower returns than their inner indexes. / Utbudet av etiska fonder har ökat kraftigt i Sverige under de senaste åren. Uppsatsens mål är att kartlägga hur etiska dessa fonder verkligen är samt att undersöka deras finansiella utveckling. Investeringskriterierna för de etiska ak-tiefonder som är förvaltade av svenska företag och institut är analyserade och jämförda. En innehavsanalys av varje fonds aktieinnehav är gjord för att se i vilken utsträckning de lever upp till de etiska krav de själva satt upp och till vil-ken grad de skiljer sig från övriga aktiefonder. Analysen av de etiska fondernas finansiella utveckling är gjord över perioden 2003-03-31 – 2006-03-31 och finansiella mått såsom Sharpe, M2 RAP och Jensen’s alpha har använts. Dessutom har fondavgifterna jämförts, både med var-andra och med andra fonder av liknande karaktär. Resultaten av analyserna vi-sar att majoriteten av de etiska fonderna knappast kan betraktas som mer etiska än andra fonder, samtidigt som de har en något sämre riskkorrigerad utveckling än index. Det vill säga, trots att de till största del är identiska med vanliga aktie-fonder rent innehållsmässigt, så blir utfallet högre riskexponering och/eller läg-re avkastning än deras inbördes index.

No description available.

<p>The supply of ethical funds has increased greatly in Sweden during recent years. The purpose of the thesis is to examine how ethical these funds really are and further-more investigate their financial development. The investment criteria’s for ethical mutual funds that are managed by Swedish companies and institutes are analysed and compared. A content analysis over every fund’s holdings has been done in order to see to what extent they live up to their own ethical standards and to what degree they differ from other mutual funds.</p><p>The analysis of the ethical funds financial development have been done over the pe-riod 2003-03-31 – 2006-03-31 and financial measures such as Sharpe, M2 RAP and Jensen’s alpha are used. In addition, the fees of the funds are compared, both with each other and with other funds of similar character. The results of the analysis show that the majority of the ethical funds cannot be treated as more ethical than other funds. Regardless of their similarity to other funds they have a slightly worse risk ad-justed performance development than index. So despite the fact that the funds are more or less identical to other funds from an investment perspective the outcome will be higher risk exposing and/or lower returns than their inner indexes.</p> / <p>Utbudet av etiska fonder har ökat kraftigt i Sverige under de senaste åren. Uppsatsens mål är att kartlägga hur etiska dessa fonder verkligen är samt att undersöka deras finansiella utveckling. Investeringskriterierna för de etiska ak-tiefonder som är förvaltade av svenska företag och institut är analyserade och jämförda. En innehavsanalys av varje fonds aktieinnehav är gjord för att se i vilken utsträckning de lever upp till de etiska krav de själva satt upp och till vil-ken grad de skiljer sig från övriga aktiefonder.</p><p>Analysen av de etiska fondernas finansiella utveckling är gjord över perioden 2003-03-31 – 2006-03-31 och finansiella mått såsom Sharpe, M2 RAP och Jensen’s alpha har använts. Dessutom har fondavgifterna jämförts, både med var-andra och med andra fonder av liknande karaktär. Resultaten av analyserna vi-sar att majoriteten av de etiska fonderna knappast kan betraktas som mer etiska än andra fonder, samtidigt som de har en något sämre riskkorrigerad utveckling än index. Det vill säga, trots att de till största del är identiska med vanliga aktie-fonder rent innehållsmässigt, så blir utfallet högre riskexponering och/eller läg-re avkastning än deras inbördes index.</p>