Inaug.-diss.--Stuttgart. Technische hochschule. / Lebenslauf.

Thesis (M.S. in M.E.)--School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2004. Directed by W. Steven Johnson. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 161-163).

Inaug.-diss.--Technische hochschule, Stuttgart. / Lebens- und bildungsgang. "Erschien als selbständiges buch unter dem titel 'Ligenspannung, gefüge und festigkeit warmgeschlagener nieten' im verlage von Wilhelm Ernst & sohn, Berlin." Includes bibliographical references.

Inaug.-diss.--Stuttgart. Technische hochschule. / Lebenslauf.

Inaug.-diss.--Technische hochschule, Stuttgart. / Lebens- und bildungsgang. "Erschien als selbständiges buch unter dem titel 'Ligenspannung, gefüge und festigkeit warmgeschlagener nieten' im verlage von Wilhelm Ernst & sohn, Berlin." Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1934. / Cover title. Part II and vita mimeographed.

No description available.

No description available.

The automotive industry is currently trying to replace the conventional steels to lightweight materials such as aluminum or carbon fiber to meet all stricter emission targets. When using such materials, traditional joining methods, such as spot welds, could be difficult to use. Therefore, more focus has been put on self-piercing rivets (SPR).In whole car models used in crash simulations, substitution models are used to model SPR joints. It is important to calibrate these models for different load cases. Volvo Cars Corporation (VCC) are currently calibrating using time-consuming physical tests where the SPR joint is subjected to loads in different directions. To save time, a way of virtually evaluating the SPR joint strength is therefore sought after. To do this, a method was developed using non-linear FEM in LS-DYNA. The method was then used to perform sensitivity studies concerning friction, sheet thickness and rivet geometry.The method developed can be divided into three parts. The process simulation, where the rivet insertion was simulated. A springback analysis, where the material is allowed to springback, closer resembling the real behaviour. Finally, the three destructive tests, lap-shear, cross-tension and KS2, were built using the geometry and initial values from the springback.For the process simulation, an explicit solution was used. To handle the large deformations present during the event, r-adaptivity was used together with a kill-element-method to describe failure, based on CrachFEM or Gissmo. The following springback analysis was then performed using one implicit step.For the destructive tests, a solid element representation of the SPR joint was created using the geometry and initial values from the springback. A shell-solid hybrid model was used to keep the computational time low.Using the method, a good correlation was found both for the process- and the destructive test simulations when compared to experiments. Furthermore, it could be concluded that friction, sheet thickness and rivet geometry affects the SPR joint strength and characteristics.

Este trabalho analisou as diferenças entre o processo de conformação de rebites de Alumínio da liga AA 5052 e de aço inoxidável das ligas ABNT 420, ABNT 430 e ABNT 302, os quais são utilizados em grande escala na indústria cuteleira. Levando em conta as particularidades de cada material em estudo, foram analisadas as forças de conformação, tensões, deformações e temperaturas. A partir delas buscou-se chegar a um modelo de processo viável para se obter rebites de Aço inoxidável. Apesar da fabricação do rebite de Alumínio ser menos crítica, no que diz respeito a força necessária para conformação, a qualidade do produto é inferior, quando se compara com o Aço inoxidável. Este confere maior resistência mecânica e resistência à corrosão. Para modelamento do processo desenvolvido com o Alumínio AA5052 e com as ligas de Aço inoxidável utilizadas utilizou-se o software de simulação por elementos finitos SIMUFACT 11.0. Os resultados das simulações com o aço inoxidável com temperaturas a morno demonstraram grande dependência da temperatura para obtenção de tensões e forças suportadas pelo ferramental. Alguns resultados alcançados com o aço inoxidável aquecido, quando se variaram as temperaturas de 25ºC até 500ºC, geraram o grau de tensões e esforços no ferramental menor ou igual à condição onde o Alumínio é conformado a frio. Também, critérios como resistência à corrosão foram determinantes para a aprovação das ligas de aço inoxidável 302 e 430 estudadas. Esse resultado confirmou o que é indicado na bibliografia, onde são recomendadas ligas austeníticas e ferríticas, ao invés de martensíticas, para a fabricação de produtos de aço inoxidável que exigem alta resistência à corrosão, como é o caso dos rebites. / This study analyzed the differences between the rivet manufacturing process made by Aluminum of alloy AA5052 and Stainless Steel of alloys AISI 420, AISI 430 and AISI 302, wich are widely used in the cutlery industry. Taking into account the particularities of both materials, it was analyzed forming forces, stresses, strains and temperatures in order to find a viable process to manufacture stainless steel rivets. Even the manufacturing of Aluminum rivets is less critical, regarding the forming forces, the quality of the product is inferior than the stainless steel, wich provides more mechanical and corrosion resistance. The study of the process of forming Aluminum AA5052 and Stainless Steel rivets was developed using the finite elements software SIMUFACT 11.0. The simulation results of the Stainless Steel with warm temperatures showed big influence of the temperature to obtain lower stresses and forces, wich are supported by the tools. Some results with heated Stainless steel, considering temperatures from 25ºC to 500ºC, resulted in lower stress and tool forces than in the Aluminum with cold temperatures. Also, criteria like corrosion resistance was very important to the approval of the Stainless Steel AISI 302 and AISI 430. Those results confirm the information available in the bibliography, where it is preferential austenitic and ferritic alloys of stainless steel instead of martensitic alloys, when used to manufacture stainless steel rivets, wich require high corrosion resistance.