No description available.

The state transportation agencies (STAs) in the United States are mandated by federal rule to carry out work-zone impact assessment for highway rehabilitation projects. The work zone impact assessment requires calculating road user costs (RUCs) which is the sum of vehicle operating costs, accident costs, and value of time (VOT). The term ‘value of time’ refers to monetary equivalent of travel time wasted due to rehabilitation projects. In current practice, STAs assume VOT as homogeneous within their respective states. This leads to inaccurate RUCs calculations and poses many misapplications. Research has found that VOT is influenced by socio-demographic variables which vary within the states. But there is a lack of framework to evaluate the extent to which these factors affect value of time. The major objective of this research is to develop and validate a model that predicts value of time heterogeneously. The data were collected to cover 20 major cities in California. The state of California was chosen for this study because most highway rehabilitation projects are carried out there. The data sources included the United States Census Bureau, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. With these data, a predictive model was developed using multiple linear regression analysis. Lastly, the model was validated using PRESS statistic. The results reveal that age, annual average daily traffic, and effective hourly income were the most significant factors influencing value of time. This study developed a model which will help Caltrans in calculating value of time heterogeneously and therefore, improve the accuracy of RUCs calculations. Moreover, this research will serve as a guideline for other STAs to develop models for respective states. Therefore, this model has a potential to greatly improve the accuracy of value of time and therefore, RUCs. The future research should focus on the identified factors, especially cost-of-living index and annual average daily traffic. Further research is required to account for heterogeneity due to other factors such as vehicle occupancy, frequency of travel, and educational qualifications.

No description available.

Several factors have influenced the recent development in charging of heavy goods vehicles in Europe. European legislation is changed and the political will is strong in many countries. The public awareness and acceptance is large for the need to put a price and a cost on the use of infrastructure. Environmental concerns are also actuating change in this direction. Systems are being introduced to support and enhance principles of marginal cost, fair pricing, inclusion of emission factors and to support modal shift. This has laid the foundation for a payment will for good technical solutions in the field of road user charging. This licentiate thesis aims at analysing and identifying the most important factors and areas to focus on for reaching a successful implementation of a system for charging heavy goods vehicles based on distance and marginal cost. These are: - Public acceptance and use of opportunities and public opinion - The political process and most important decision points - The legal framework before and during introduction as well as for operation of a system - The institutional framework - Responsibility assignment - System procurement and implementation, including procurement strategy, technology choices, testing and demonstration and interoperability Another important contribution is the implementation process model for an introduction of a distance based system for heavy goods vehicles in a country. The model comprises of the most important aspects to consider which has been made through the study and analysis of both implemented and cancelled systems as well as planned introductions, where the Swedish work in this direction has formed the major part of the analysis. The implementation process model with its main actors, decision points and information flow between actor groups are cornerstones of the model, which can serve as a tool for future implementers to follow.

<p>Several factors have influenced the recent development in charging of heavy goods vehicles in Europe. European legislation is changed and the political will is strong in many countries. The public awareness and acceptance is large for the need to put a price and a cost on the use of infrastructure. Environmental concerns are also actuating change in this direction. Systems are being introduced to support and enhance principles of marginal cost, fair pricing, inclusion of emission factors and to support modal shift. This has laid the foundation for a payment will for good technical solutions in the field of road user charging.</p><p>This licentiate thesis aims at analysing and identifying the most important factors and areas to focus on for reaching a successful implementation of a system for charging heavy goods vehicles based on distance and marginal cost. These are:</p><p>- Public acceptance and use of opportunities and public opinion</p><p>- The political process and most important decision points</p><p>- The legal framework before and during introduction as well as for operation of a system</p><p>- The institutional framework</p><p>- Responsibility assignment</p><p>- System procurement and implementation, including procurement strategy, technology choices, testing and demonstration and interoperability</p><p>Another important contribution is the implementation process model for an introduction of a distance based system for heavy goods vehicles in a country. The model comprises of the most important aspects to consider which has been made through the study and analysis of both implemented and cancelled systems as well as planned introductions, where the Swedish work in this direction has formed the major part of the analysis. The implementation process model with its main actors, decision points and information flow between actor groups are cornerstones of the model, which can serve as a tool for future implementers to follow.</p>

Performance goals for a highway system are an indication of the desired system condition, and the level of service to be provided to its users. Setting the appropriate performance goals has a significant impact on the way highway agencies conduct business. With growing needs and limited resources, the consequences of setting different levels of performance goals should be examined and compared to optimize the highway infrastructure needs at the network level. Three interacting sets of costs are typically considered for a complete economic appraisal of highway projects: construction, maintenance and road use costs. Due to the shift in focus from design-and-build mode to the repair-and-maintain mode, this study focuses on maintenance related costs and the road user cost aspects only. Maintenance and rehabilitation activities on pavement infrastructure are ongoing processes that are required for the entire road network. This suggests that for long planning horizons and geographically extensive networks, their application usually results in significant financial needs. Typically, highway agencies have based their policy decisions such as the target condition levels for the system on the budget needs for maintenance and rehabilitation actions. Since in most cases, the funding needs exceed the available budget, the required preventive and routine maintenance activities suffer or are overlooked completely. Failure to timely apply these maintenance actions cause the pavements to deteriorate more rapidly into condition states that require for more expensive rehabilitation actions during the life cycle of the pavement. Over time, a vicious cycle is instigated in which the maintenance and rehabilitation needs of the network keep increasing each year. Although most highway administrators acknowledge the fact that pavement preservation is perhaps the most effective way of using the limited budgets available, the costs associated with deferring maintenance actions is oftentimes overlooked when establishing performance goals for the system. Road user costs in the form of costs for vehicle operation have been recognized as another large component of the total transportation related costs. These costs are then arguably the most important to consider for a complete economic appraisal. Ironically, they are also often disregarded while making important policy decisions. Other road user costs such as those related to the impact of traffic congestion and detours caused by construction and maintenance activities are difficult to quantify and were not accounted for in this study. Although it is widely accepted that establishing suitable performance goal is critical for system maintenance and preservation, a framework that considers the inter-relationship between conflicting objectives of minimum maintenance and rehabilitation costs, deferred maintenance costs, and vehicle operating costs to the users does not exist. This thesis proposes a methodological framework that is aimed at assisting highway agencies with the problem of objectively analyzing policy decisions in terms of the performance goals for their highway networks that would minimize the total transport costs to the society. In a case study of the proposed framework, the highway network managed by the Texas Department of Transportation was examined for different performance goals. The results from the case study indicate that setting lower performance goals lead to savings in the M&R needs, but at the same time, they also significantly increase the exogenous costs such as deferred maintenance costs and the vehicle operating costs. / text

The aim of this study is to investigate which effects the introduction of the new legislation for bicyclestreets has on road users. The focus has been on studying road users' compliance, accessibility andexperience of bicycle streets. Since the legislation came into force in December 2020, vehicles entering abicycle street have a duty to give way to road users on the bicycle street and drivers of motor vehicleshave to adapt their speed to the bicycle traffic. There is also a general speed limit of 30 km/h and parkingis only allowed in designated areas.The report consists of three main sections, the first of which reviews the history and dialogue behind thecurrent legislation and addresses some of the main points of criticisms leveled at it. This was exploredthrough a detailed review of the available documents and studies dealing with bicycle streets. Thesecond part aims to review the conditions for cycle streets in Sweden and to provide an overview of theopportunities and challenges that exist. This part includes, among other things, thorough examinationsof previous studies of bicycle streets, existing bicycle streets in Sweden, similar legislation and aninternational outlook where bicycle streets in other countries in Northern Europe are studied. The lastpart is a case study of one of Sweden's first bicycle streets in Varberg where, among other things,speeds, movement patterns and yielding behavior of road users are studied. This was investigatedthrough radar measurements, video analysis and visual observations on site. Furthermore, two differentsurveys were carried out, one of which aimed to find out the opinions and experiences of road users onthe bicycle street in Varberg. The second survey was of a more general nature and aimed to collect roadusers' opinions on issues related to bicycle streets.The results indicate that there is a general consensus among experts, planners and road users thatbicycle streets have the potential to improve cyclists' accessibility and road safety and, in the long term,to encourage more people to cycle. However, several shortcomings are found in the existing legislationthat many believe prevent the bicycle street from achieving its purpose. For example, there are currentlyno official guidelines on how a bicycle street should be designed and there is also older legislation thatprevents cyclists from being able to use the whole roadway and cycle side by side. The case study revealsseveral interesting findings that confirm several points of criticism of bicycle streets and its legislation.Among other things, the majority of the observed cyclists chose to take up space in the roadway and alsoride side by side. The survey results also indicate that a change in traffic regulations to allow this onbicycle streets is something that is desired by a majority. Based on the results of the study, severalsuggestions are made for regulation changes that would make the bicycle street better serve its purpose.For example, it is suggested that cyclists should always be allowed to use the whole roadway and rideside by side on bicycle streets. It is also recommended that the responsible authorities develop nationalrecommendations for the physical design of cycle lanes as soon as possible. As for other common viewson regulatory changes, such as whether or not overtaking of cyclists should be allowed and what speedlimit should apply on bicycle streets, further studies need to be carried out before any conclusions canbe drawn.

Road user costs (RUCs) quantify the inconveniences to road users resulting from ongoing construction projects. Although the concept of RUC has traditionally been associated with the life cycle cost analysis, its importance has increased in alternative contracting methods in recent years. Despite its importance, the Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) currently lacks a systematic methodology to compute RUCs. With the increased use of alternative contracting such as A+B, TDOT can benefit significantly if a systematic methodology and a tool are developed to compute RUCs in-house. The main goal of this study is to develop a framework and accompanying tool to compute RUCs, which balances the ease of computing and accuracy of results. To achieve this goal, the study reviewed existing literature on the topic, conducted a nationwide survey, and identified the current best practices of calculating and utilizing RUCs. The study found that more than half of the state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) that responded to the questionnaire have developed their state-specific methodologies to compute RUCs. The delay costs and the vehicle operating costs are the two most common components computed by a majority of state DOTs. Based on the findings of the study, a framework to compute RUCs is developed to enable TDOT to quickly compute RUCs more efficiently. Subsequently, a spreadsheet based TDOT RUC Calculation Tool (TRCT) is developed to implement the framework. The tool can compute four components of the RUC: a) delay cost, b) vehicle operating cost, c) crash cost, and d) emission cost. Relevant standard datasets such as median household income and emission rates were collected and/or produced for the tool. The tool automatically accounts for the spatiotemporal variation in the RUCs using Consumer Price Index (CPI) and county-specific data. The computed RUCs can be used for A+B contracting, benefit-cost analysis, liquidated damage computation, and early-completion-incentive computation.

Light Emitting Diode (LED) is used in traffic signals and highway illumination in the Texas Department of Transportation, Houston District (TxDOT). The thesis focuses on the cost of maintenance of the LED for signals on the highway system in the Houston District. This LED cost includes human and capital resources which are compared against the cost associated with the incandescent bulb used in traffic signals at a similar location in Houston. The analysis leads to actionable decisions to see if total migration of the LED is advisable or not, amidst budgetary constraints and the benefits thereof. / text

The erection of tollgates along the N1 freeway has triggered a great deal of interest. As a result of the toll fees, traffic has been diverted to alternative roads. This study investigates how traffic diverted from the toll road affect the welfare of users of the alternative road. The literature review provides a theoretical framework of economic impact assessment and road pricing. Furthermore, the literature study reviews previous studies of a similar nature and compare them with the findings of this study. There is no conclusive evidence that diversion of traffic from the N1 causes congestion on the R101 and has a negative impact on the economy of the region. On the contrary, evidence suggests that there was an initial diversion of traffic when the toll came into operation but that is slowly filtered back after six months. In the application of the RED model, economic benefits are derived from user benefits, which is a function of savings in VOC’s and time of normal and generated traffic on a road or saving due to an improvement in road safety, resulting from improved roads. A decrease in traffic has a measurable effect on vehicle travel speeds and travel time only when the roads are significantly congested. In the case of scenario 1 (including diversion), frequent maintenance needs to be performed under increased traffic. Increased traffic due to “diverted traffic” causes congestion in accidents and travelling time, which is a cost to the economy. Under scenario 2 (excluding diversion), it is assumed that ADT will return to normal. Due to lower levels of congestion and travelling times would be faster, while maintenance costs and accident rates would decrease. Scenario 2 is selected as being economically the most feasible option. It is clear that the R101 cannot cope with the current levels of traffic and congestion. One can speculate about the causes of the congestion but in order to derive at a solution to the problem more research needs to be done on the cause of the congestion in order to resolve the problem. / Dissertation (Magister Commercii)--University of Pretoria, 2007. / Economics / unrestricted