The focus of this study is aristocratic fathers and sons in the middle and late Roman Republic (264 – 27 B.C.). By considering legal, literary, and material evidence, it addresses the behaviour of elite families throughout this period. Although there is a great deal of important research conducted on family relations in the ancient world more generally, there is no extensive study which analyses the bonds of duty, obligation, and affection between fathers and sons in republican Rome. It is this gap in the scholarship which is addressed in my thesis. The key aspects of this relationship are considered through several interconnected chapters. Each reflects the social nature of this analysis, and demonstrates that traditional values, dynastic considerations, and social ideals promoted a sense of common identity and unity within the household. Although the hierarchical nature of Roman family life also provided opportunities for conflict between father and son, ultimately the relationship between the two was governed by these three concerns, as well as the close correlation between public and private in the lives of the republican elite. The discussion begins by considering the high valuation of fatherhood at Rome, evidenced by the use of terms derived from pater, and argues that the qualities expected of this individual were similar to those associated with the ideal statesman (Ch. I). From there, depictions of the Roman father by Greek and Roman authors are analysed to show that the former often emphasised the morality of the episode in question, while the latter stressed the conflict between the well-being of the family and the safety of the state (Ch. II). The argument then moves on to explore social expectations. Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino provides an example in which the ideals for father and son relationships are manipulated in order to persuade an audience (Ch. III). This shows that pietas, duty, companionship, and support towards one another were recognised as norms for these individuals. The discussion of the paterfamilias in the following chapter demonstrates that he was expected to act as a role model for future generations, and to provide education and protection to his dependants (Ch. IV). The reputation and continuity of the family line were also important considerations for the aristocratic head of household. From there, traditional values, dynastic considerations, and social ideals are explored through the family life-cycle (Ch. V). This section establishes that these three areas fostered a sense of common identity and unity within the household, and exerted significant pressure upon fathers and sons to maintain relatively harmonious relationships. The final chapter considers literary portrayals of Rome’s founders in order to reiterate the close correlation between the ideal of the father and the ideal of the statesman (Ch. VI). It concludes that the use of the father-figure by Augustus and later emperors to legitimise their position in the state develops from the ideological significance of fatherhood in the Republic.

Au cours des dernières décennies, la recherche sur l’aristocratie romaine s’est largement diversifiée en s’ouvrant, au-delà des aspects politiques et prosopographiques bien défrichés, à de nouvelles problématiques telles que les formes de communication des élites, la sémiologie du pouvoir ou encore les rapports entre les pratiques politiques et l’espace. La thèse s’insère dans ces nouvelles approches et y apporte une importante innovation : si l’espace de la vie aristocratique a longtemps été conçu de façon dichotomique entre urbs et rus, entre domus et uilla, le travail proposé démontre la pertinence d’un troisième espace trop longtemps négligé par la recherche, les horti résidentiels de Rome. L’étude des jardins en tant que résidences aristocratiques, situées dans des espaces verdoyants en dehors et en même temps très proches de la ville, permet de remplacer la dichotomie domus-uilla par le triptyque domus-horti-uilla, de découvrir un cadre peu connu de l’action politique, ainsi que les conditions et potentialités des interactions spécifiques à ce troisième lieu de résidence. L’étude des horti s’appuie essentiellement sur une analyse systématique de l’ensemble des sources littéraires ; elle prend en compte les données archéologiques lorsqu'elles sont conservées et disponibles. L'étude de l'historiographie des jardins est le préalable de la conceptualisation de l'objet de recherche. / In the last few decades, research on Roman aristocracy has been largely diversified by extending its scope, over and beyond well-known political and prosopographical aspects, to new issues such as the forms of communication of the elite, the semiology of power, or the relation between political practices and space. This PhD follows these paths and introduces an important innovation: if the space of the aristocratic life has long been considered as a dichotomy between urbs and rus, between domus and uilla, the present work demonstrates the relevance of a third place long neglected by researchers,the residential horti of Rome. The study of gardens as aristocratic residences, located in green spaces outside of the city and at the same time very close to it, allows for the replacement of traditional domus-uilla dichotomy by the domus-horti-uilla triptych and leads to the discovery a little known place of political action along with the conditions and potential for interaction proper to this third place of residence. The study of horti is based primarily on a systematic analysis of numerous literarysources; it takes into account archaeological data wherever available. The study of garden historiography is a preliminary to the conceptualization of this study.