No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

A non-linear finite element model has been developed to analyse reinforced concrete structures taking into account : (1) non-linear concrete behaviour under biaxial stress, (2) progressive cracking of the concrete, and (3) interaction between the reinforcement and the concrete matrix commonly known as bond. Three dimensional reinforced concrete components are analysed by an approximate two dimensional plane stress model. Bond is considered to be a concentric layer surrounding the reinforcement modelled by a 6 noded rectangular 'shearing' element. The concrete is represented by 8 noded isoparametric membrane elements and the reinforcement by 3 noded isoparametric bar elements. The finite element model uses, an incremental iterative solution technique known as the 'Initial stress method' and a special solution technique to allow for cracking of the concrete. stiffnesses within elements are evaluated by numerical integration using Gaussian Quadrature, with elastic moduli stored at the sampling positions. The bond model is based upon an assumed non-linear relationship between bond stress and slip in which the localised ultimate bond stress' is a function of both the lateral pressures exerted by the concrete on the reinforcement and the radial contraction of the bar' due to Poisson's effect. Allowance is also made for the deterioration of bond when the slip exceeds a tolerance value. The concrete model is a non-linear elastic fracture model based upon the 'Equivalent uniaxial strain approach' as developed by Darwin and Pecknold (1974). Cracking of the concrete is assumed to be 'smeared' within the concrete element. Reinforced concrete components which have been analysed include; the ordinary pullout test, double ended pull out test, a transfer test, and a beam-column intersection. A small experimental programme was conducted to obtain reliable data as to the nature of the bond stress and reinforcement strain distributions in the double-ended pullout test, the transfer test and the beam-column intersection. To determine the reinforcement strain distributions, plain round bars or ribbed reinforcement bars in the case of the beam-column, were embedded in the concrete specimens with electrical strain gauges attached . The author's computer programs are explained and listed in the appendices.

No description available.

Noise and vibration are important design issues for many types of vehicles such as ships, cars, and aeroplanes. Structure borne sound, which may be of relatively high frequency, usually emanates from an engine or some other type of localised source and propagates through the vehicle. Excessive vibration levels, and thus structural damage, may occur while structural acoustic interactions may lead to unacceptable interior noise. In the analysis of energy transmission between plate structures, it is common practice to consider only bending modes (or waves) of the structure. However if the concern is with high frequency vibration analysis, then due allowance may need to be made for the presence of inplane shear and longitudinal modes. Due to the infeasibility of the industry standard technique, the Finite Element Method, at high frequencies, almost all of the studies that have investigated the importance of in-plane energy transmission have used Statistical Energy Analysis (SEA). In this study an existing dynamic stiffness method is extended to include in-plane effects, and used as a benchmark against which SEA is assessed. Additionally the Wave Intensity Analysis (WIA) technique, which is an improved form of SEA, is extended to in-plane vibrations, and used to identify some of the reasons for the poor performance of SEA in certain applications. All three methods are applied to a wide range of plate structures within the frequency range of 600 Hz to 20 kHz. While the response levels as predicted by the WIA are generally quite close to exact results, it has been found that although all of the requirements which are usually postulated for the successful application of SEA are fulfilled, SEA severely underpredicts the energy transmission in large structures because of the diffuse wave field assumption. It is also shown that the exclusion of in-plane modes may lead to sizeable errors in energy predictions unless the structure is very simple.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.