Water used in fresh produce washing is a potential vehicle of foodborne pathogen contamination. This work focused on assessing the sanitizing efficacy of ethanol mist to reduce Salmonella populations on the surfaces of tomatoes and cantaloupes. Ethanol (70%) mist was applied to whole tomatoes and cantaloupe rind plugs using a Biomist sanitation system, which uses CO2 as a carrier gas to spray vapors through a fine droplet spray nozzle. Fresh red tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) and cantaloupe (Cucumis melo) plugs were inoculated with Salmonella enterica Newport to a concentration of log 7 CFU/tomato and log 7 CFU/cm2 respectively. Application time (5, 10, and 15 sec), dry vs. wet surface, and stem scar contamination were evaluated on tomatoes, while only application time was evaluated on cantaloupe. Application of ethanol mist for 10 seconds was the most effective treatment time, reducing Salmonella by 3.3 log CFU/tomato. Application of ethanol mist was more effective on dry opposed to wet tomato surfaces by approximately 0.7 log CFU/tomato. Ethanol mist application to inoculated tomato stem scars reduced Salmonella 1.2 log CFU/tomato. Additionally, Salmonella decreased by 1.3 log CFU/cm2 on cantaloupe rind plugs at 10 seconds, again the most effective treatment time. Ethanol mist resulted in sufficient reductions of Salmonella populations on dry tomato surfaces, but was limited in effectiveness if the surface was wet, or if Salmonella adhered to the stem scar. Furthermore, this technique was overall not an efficient method to sanitize cantaloupe surfaces. / Master of Science in Life Sciences / Water is often used in washing and moving fresh produce during harvesting. However, this water is often found to be a source of contamination that can cause the fruits or vegetables to become unsafe to eat. In order to resolve this problem, a mist-type sanitizing system is being explored to wash fresh produce in packinghouses. In this experiment, a mist of ethanol (70%) was applied to whole tomato and cantaloupe plugs using a Biomist sanitation system, which turns liquids into a mist. Whole fresh tomatoes and cantaloupe plugs were infected with Salmonella enterica bacteria. Tomatoes and cantaloupe plugs were treated with ethanol mist for various times of 5, 10, or 15 seconds. Additionally, tomatoes were treated with ethanol to compare a wet surfaced tomato, as well as the tomatoes stem scar (where the vine of the tomato is attached during growing). Ethanol mist application was most effective at 10 seconds, but there was very little difference in bacterial elimination when all the times were compared to the untreated tomatoes. In addition, the mists effectiveness decreased if the surface of the tomato was wet compared to dry, and was even less effective if the bacteria were located where the vine attaches. Also, the ethanol mist has very little effect if bacterial contamination is present on a cantaloupes surface. If a harvested tomato remains dry post harvest, ethanol mist may make for a good washing system. However, it is probably not the best for rough surfaced produce like cantaloupes.

Over the past decade, the Eastern Shore of Virginia (ESV) has been implicated in at least four outbreaks of Salmonellosis associated with tomato all originating from the same strain, Salmonella enterica serovar Newport.  In addition to S. Newport contamination, the devastating plant disease, bacterial wilt, caused by the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum threatens the sustainability of ESV tomato production.  Bacterial wilt is present in most ESV tomato fields and causes devastating yield losses each year.  Due to the ESV\'s endemic population of R. solanacearum and S. Newport, the relationship between the two pathogens is of interest and has never been investigated.  Two separate studies were conducted to assess the relationship between these two bacteria.  One study consisted of a series of greenhouse trials that involved root-dip inoculations of tomato plants with one of four treatments: 1) S. Newport, 2) R. solanacearum, 3) a co-inoculation of S. Newport + R. solanacearum, and 4) a control group with no inoculation. Leaf, stem, and fruit samples were collected from the plants and S. enterica presence from the internal tissues was observed.  S. enterica was recovered from a low percentage of fruit and leaf samples.  There were significantly more stem samples from plants co-inoculated with S. Newport + R. solanacearum positive for S. enterica (17.46%) than from other treatments.  Another study examined the relationship between the two bacteria via vacuum infiltration inoculations of tomato fruit collected from commercial production fields on the ESV with S. Newport.  Tomato fruit were collected from plants expressing symptoms of bacterial wilt (symptomatic) and plants not expressing bacterial wilt symptoms (asymptomatic).  After fruit infiltration with S. Newport, recovery concentration of S. enterica from internal tissues was measured.  S. enterica populations were greater in fruit originating from asymptomatic (5.15 log CFU/g) versus symptomatic (4.91 log CFU/g) plants across five studies.  Fruit collected from asymptomatic plants had a significantly higher internal pH (4.60) than fruit collected from symptomatic plants (4.37).  These results suggest that R. solanacearum can influence S. enterica survival and transportation throughout the internal tissues of tomato plants as well as the influence internal tomato fruit pH, which could potentially impact S. Newport survival in the fruit. / Master of Science in Life Sciences