• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Elei??o de dirigente escolar: a democracia em quest?o ? um estudo de caso do Col?gio Agr?cola Dom Agostinho IKAS - CODAI/UFRPE / Election of school leader: democracy in question - Case study of the Agricultural College D. Augustine Ikas - CODAI/UFRPE

NETO, Jos? Soares 14 March 2016 (has links)
Submitted by Jorge Silva (jorgelmsilva@ufrrj.br) on 2017-02-17T18:51:02Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Jos? Soares Neto.pdf: 3636688 bytes, checksum: 00820fc3971613d6966c6139682d3a19 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-17T18:51:02Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2016 - Jos? Soares Neto.pdf: 3636688 bytes, checksum: 00820fc3971613d6966c6139682d3a19 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-14 / This work is a survey conducted by the school community of the Agricultural College Dom Augustine Ikas- Codai School linked to the Rural Federal University of Pernambuco - UFRPE, located in S?o Louren?o da Mata - PE, the metropolitan area ofGreater Recife. Through the point of view of a sample: managers, teachers, administrative staff, students and parents and / or guardians, we set out to know how has been built a participatory and democratic management in Codai in a specific process: the selection process top manager of the institution. We show that social agents (managers, servers, students and parents) know the importance of participation, claim their rights as citizens, and defend democracy. In addition to this evidence, what this study showed is that the school community keeps alive the democracy, when, in their various demands, demands for rights that were not being observed in CODAI, either in the electoral process, either in the Statute / Regulation, be in compliance with legislation. The result we reached shows that the social actors claim their differences, make demands to broaden their own rights, showing that the democratic process, by its very nature, is unfinished, always behaving some degree of exclusion. What we can not investigate is whether the actors in question have theoretical or intuitive knowledge that the democratic process is not, and can not claim to be absolutely inclusive. / Esta disserta??o trata de uma pesquisa realizada junto ? comunidade escolar do Col?gio Agr?cola Dom Agostinho Ikas?Codai, escola vinculada ? Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco-UFRPE, localizado no munic?pio de S?o Louren?o da Mata - PE, ?rea metropolitana do Grande Recife. Atrav?s do ponto de vista de uma amostra de: gestores, docentes, t?cnicos administrativos, discentes e pais e/ou respons?veis, propusemo-nos saber como vem sendo constru?da uma gest?o participativa e democr?tica no Codai em um processo espec?fico: o processo de escolha do dirigente m?ximo da institui??o. Mostramos que os agentes sociais (gestores, servidores, discentes e pais) sabem da import?ncia da participa??o, afirmam seus direitos de cidad?o, e defendem a democracia. Para al?m desta comprova??o, o que este estudo evidenciou ? que a comunidade escolar mant?m viva a democracia, quando, em suas v?rias demandas, reclama por direitos que n?o estariam sendo observados no CODAI, seja no processo eleitoral, seja no Estatuto/Regulamento, seja na obedi?ncia ? legisla??o. O resultado a que chegamos revela que os atores sociais afirmam suas diferen?as, fazem demandas no sentido de ampliar seus pr?prios direitos, mostrando que o processo democr?tico, por sua pr?pria natureza, ? inconcluso, sempre comportando algum grau de exclus?o. O que n?o conseguimos investigar ? se os atores em quest?o t?m conhecimento te?rico ou intuitivo de que o processo democr?tico n?o ?, e nem pode pretender ser, absolutamente inclusivo.

Page generated in 0.1163 seconds