隨著實驗教育三法的通過，公立學校發展實驗教育的新型態─「學校型態實驗教育」為偏鄉學校提供另類轉型的契機與出路。在《學校型態實驗教育實施條例》中，明文規定辦理此類實驗教育之學校可針對學校部分校務行政事項進行實驗，不受一般教育法規的限制。本研究旨在探討原本在面臨困境的臺灣公立偏鄉小學，在辦理實驗教育後在校務行政的運作有何實際的轉變與改進，並藉此了解學校型態實驗教育政策的內涵。 本研究透過深度訪談及田野調查之質性研究方法，探究偏鄉小學辦理學校型態實驗教育之校務行政變革與挑戰，得到的研究結論如下：（一）主管機關針對學校型態實驗教育政策無明確發展之目標；（二）辦理學校型態實驗教育之偏鄉小學行政業務量整體而言不減反增；（三）偏鄉小學部分行政業務並沒有因為辦理實驗教育而得到彈性發展的空間；（四）偏鄉小學因辦理學校型態實驗教育逐漸活絡校內課程討論與教學經驗分享的氛圍；（五）學校行政人員與教師在使用特定理念的教學方法時，面臨許多實際面上執行的困境，與主管機關所期望之理想情況有落差；（六）家長不夠清楚實驗教育的內涵，容易對實驗教育抱有過高的期望。最後，針對這些上述歸納之研究結論，提出對於主管機關實施學校型態實驗教育政策以及未來學校型態實驗教育相關研究的建議。 / As the Three-type acts of experimental education passed, the new type of experimental education for public schools－" Enforcement Act for School-based Experimental Education" encourages rural schools to change and transform. In "Enforcement Act for School-based Experimental Education," the act also expressly indicates that some administrative affairs of these school-based experimental schools could be experimented, not confined to normal education legislation. The aim of this study was to explore how school administration of Taiwan public rural elementary schools, which originally faced with challenges, actually change and improve, and to understand the school-based experimental education policy. Qualitative research method including an in-depth interview and field work were adopted to collect the data and to investigate how school administration change and what challenges they face. The conclusion of this study are as follow: (a) the authorities have no clear developmental aim on school-based experimental education policy, (b) on the whole, the amount of administration affairs for school-based experimental schools isn't less than before, is much more than before, rather, (c) part of administration affairs still have no flexible room for development, (d) the atmosphere of curriculum discussion and teaching experience share become more active, (e) specified teaching method used by school administrators and teachers is practically difficult, and doesn't meet expectations of the authorities, (f) parents who don't clearly comprehend the content of experimental education, tend to highly overestimate it. Finally, suggestions are given to the authorities and future researchers to improve the school-based experimental education according to conclusions above.

本研究指在探討學校型態實驗教育學校之家長選擇權與學校滿意度，採用「學校型態實驗教育家長選擇權與學校滿意度之調查問卷」，以臺灣地區學校型態實驗教育學校之家長為研究對象，有效問卷共564份。資料回收以描述性統計、因素分析、項目分析、交叉分析、皮爾森積差相關、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析，其研究結果如下： 一、 學校型態實驗教育學校之家長的入學資訊來源重要性依序為親身觀察學校、依孩子學習狀況與取向共同討論、學校辦理實驗教育情形、參與該校活動等為主要參考訊息。 二、 家長選擇權首重為學習與適應，接著為教育專業及行政與環境。 三、 家長對學校滿意高低依序為教師教學與學生表現、行政服務與家長參與。 四、 不同教育程度、家庭收入、職業、學區、是否為轉學生的學校型態實驗教育家長，在家長選擇權的知覺上有差異。 五、 不同教育程度、家庭收入、職業、學區的學校型態實驗教育家長，在對學校滿意度的態度上有差異。 六、 學校型態實驗教育的家長在家長選擇權與對學校滿意度具有高度正相關。 七、 學校型態實驗教育學校的家長在家長選擇權對學校滿意度具有預測力。 根據研究結果，對學校型態實驗教育之實務、規劃、未來研究提出相關建議。 / The purpose of this research was to understand a study of school choice and satisfaction survey of school-based experimental education. “Questionnaire of school choice and satisfaction survey of school-based experimental education” was delivered to the parents, whose children were studied in of school-based experimental education in Taiwan. There were 564 valied questionnaires. Statistical techniques used to analyze the collected data are descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation and multiple regression analysis methods. The results were as follows: 1. As to admission information, parents put an emphasis on four factors, the degree in order is: personal observation, according to the child learning situation and orientation to discuss, view on school-based experimental, participate in school activities. 2. As to school choice, the degree in order is: student learning and adaptation, school education concept and teacher 's teaching, school administration and parental communication and environmental equipment. 3. As to satisfaction survey of school-based experimental education, in descending order is: teachers' teaching and student learning, school administration and parent-teacher communication. 4. Parents with different background showed significant differences on decision making for choosing school. 5. Parents with different background showed significant differences on school satisfaction. 6. There was significant canonical correlation between decision making for choosing school and school satisfaction. 7. The choosing school variables can significantly predict the parent’s satisfaction of school. The research findings and suggestions can serve as reference for educational authorities, elementary school principals and subsequent related studies.