Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-05-10T22:21:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 ThiagoTavaresDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 744215 bytes, checksum: 323a7ebfa5a3f76cd0a8e77901b3e31e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-05-17T00:23:22Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 ThiagoTavaresDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 744215 bytes, checksum: 323a7ebfa5a3f76cd0a8e77901b3e31e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-05-17T00:23:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ThiagoTavaresDeQueiroz_DISSERT.pdf: 744215 bytes, checksum: 323a7ebfa5a3f76cd0a8e77901b3e31e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-24 / O presente trabalho tem por objeto o reconhecimento da inconstitucionalidade das decis?es judiciais que determinam sequestro de contas p?blicas espec?ficas vinculadas aos conv?nios administrativos, abordando os meios jur?dicos constitucionais eficazes dispostos ? Fazenda P?blica para combate das referidas decis?es, com o fim de evitar as graves consequ?ncias jur?dicas e financeiras aos entes p?blicos convenentes. Ser?o abordadas breves reflex?es sobre conv?nios administrativos, entrementes, tra?ando um hist?rico legislativo do referido instituto descentralizador de pol?ticas p?blicas, desde a Constitui??o de 1967 at? a Constitui??o atual, passando por todo regramento legislativos infraconstitucional. Discutir-se-? as cl?ssicas diverg?ncias dos conv?nios administrativos em rela??o aos contratos, desmistificando a tradicional natureza jur?dica de ajuste ou acordo, especialmente em raz?o dos novos influxos sofridos pelos conv?nios no tocante a responsabiliza??o e obrigatoriedade do seu cumprimento pelos part?cipes. Ver-se-?o defini??es de conv?nios administrativos de natureza financeira e suas etapas de forma??o, adentrando na gest?o dos mesmos com a finalidade de comprovar a natureza final?stica das verbas presentes nos conv?nios, afastando-se da responsabilidade patrimonial dos convenentes. Ademais, discorrer-se-? sobre o procedimento de fiscaliza??o e responsabiliza??o dos gestores p?blicos envolvidos na execu??o convenial. Assim, chegar-se-? ao reconhecimento da inconstitucionalidade das decis?es judiciais de sequestros de conv?nios administrativos, ponto principal deste trabalho, no qual ser?o analisados os par?metros constitucionais violados, consubstanciados nos princ?pios da independ?ncia e harmonia dos poderes, princ?pio da reserva legal em mat?ria or?ament?ria e o princ?pio do federalismo cooperativo. N?o se nega, ademais, a viola??o constitucional ao sistema de precat?rios das entidades p?blicas, bem como ao princ?pio da impenhorabilidade dos conv?nios p?blicos. Destarte, ser? respondido o questionamento se os cr?ditos trabalhistas s?o ou n?o exce??es ao regime de precat?rios. Por outro lado ser? debatida a decis?o de sequestro judicial de contas p?blicas como v?cio constitucional subjetivo praticado pelos magistrados n?o revestidos das fun??es de Presidente de Tribunal do Poder Judici?rio. At? se chegar as graves consequ?ncias ao ente p?blico convenente responsabilizado pela inexecu??o do conv?nio, ocasionado pelo esvaziamento financeiro determinado no sequestro judicial. Culmina-se este trabalho na exposi??o dos meios jur?dicos constitucionais eficazes dispostos ? Fazenda P?blica para enfretamento das referidas decis?es judicias, consolidados no mandado de seguran?a, reclama??o constitucional, argui??o de descumprimento de preceito fundamental e na suspens?o de liminar ou de seguran?a. Entretanto, antes da an?lise espec?fica de cada caso, ser? dada aten??o ? viabilidade do controle de constitucionalidade de decis?es judiciais, para, enfim, adentrar na parte espec?fica dos meios constitucionais, explicitando as hip?teses de cabimento e fundamenta??o aptas a suspens?o e reforma dos referidos julgados, focalizados no objeto do trabalho, tecendo, por derradeiro, coment?rios a respeitos do posicionamento da jurisprud?ncia dos Tribunais Superiores e do Supremo Tribunal Federal, sobre o tema. / This paper is the acknowledgment of the unconstitutionality of judicial decisions that determine abduction of specific public accounts linked to administrative agreements, addressing the effective constitutional legal means disposed to the State to combat those decisions in order to avoid the serious legal and financial consequences to the appropriate public entities. Brief reflections on administrative agreements will be addressed, meanwhile, tracing a legislative history of that decentralizing public policy institute, since the Constitution of 1967 to the current Constitution, through all infra legislative governance. It will be discussed the classic divergence of administrative agreements for contracts, demystifying the traditional legal nature of agreements or arrangements, especially because of the new inflows suffered by the covenants regarding to accountability and mandatory compliance by the participants. It will be presented definitions of administrative agreements species of a financial nature and its formative stages, entering in their management in order to prove the purposive nature of the funds present in the covenants, and moving them away from the patrimonial responsibility of the entities in the agreements. Furthermore, it will be discuss the monitoring procedure and accountability of public officials involved in the execution of the covenants. Thus, it will get the recognition of the unconstitutionality of judicial decisions of administrative agreements kidnappings, the main point of this paper, in which violated constitutional parameters will be analyzed, grounded in the principles of independence and harmony of powers, the principle of legal reserve of the financial plan matter and the principle of cooperative federalism. Moreover, it is not denied the constitutional violation of the system of writs of public authorities as well as the principle of non pawn of public agreements. Thus, it will be answered if the workers' credits are or are not exceptions to the payment system of public entities. On the other side it will be discussed the decision of judicial abduction of public accounts as subjective constitutional addiction practiced by the magistrates who are not president of the Court. Until reaching the serious consequences to the public covenants entity responsible for non-performance of the agreement, caused by the financial drain caused by judicial abduction. This work culminates in the exposure of effective constitutional legal means disposed to the State for coping of those judicial decisions, consolidated the security warrant, constitutional complaint, arguing of fail to comply of fundamental precept and injunction or security suspension. However, before the specific analysis of each case, it will consider the feasibility of constitutionality control of the judicial decisions, to finally enter the specific part of constitutional instruments, explaining the adequate hypothesis and grounding able to suspension and reform of those judged, focused on the paper object, weaving, for last, comments to respect the position of the jurisprudence of the High Courts and the Supreme Court about the subject.