Spelling suggestions: "subject:"sheetmetal work"" "subject:"sheetmetals work""
21 |
Expanded forming limit testing for sheet forming processesShouler, Daniel Reginald January 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
22 |
Investigation of interlayer burr formation in the drilling of stacked aluminum sheetsHellstern, Cody 19 May 2009 (has links)
During the drilling process, sharp edges of material called burrs are produced and protrude from the original surface. When a through-hole is drilled, burrs form on both the entry and exit surfaces around the hole, requiring expensive deburring operations to be performed in order to meet part specifications. A common hole producing operation in aircraft assembly is drilling holes through multiple sheet metal layers in order to fasten them together. However, at the interface between two layers, burrs form on both the exit of the first layer (termed "skin") and entry of the second layer (termed "frame"). Consequently, the layers frequently need to be taken apart, deburred, and put back together again before being fastened, resulting in additional costs and increased assembly time.
The goal of this thesis was to understand the role of key factors such as drill geometry, drill wear and clamping conditions on burr formation at the interface of two thin sheets of 2024-T3 aluminum so that interlayer burr formation could be minimized. This problem was approached from three different angles. First, an experimental study was performed to find the drill geometry parameters for minimization of interlayer burrs and to ascertain the relationship between the average burr size and drill wear. Next, a new kind of clamping system for holding sheet metal layers together during drilling was designed, prototyped, and tested for its effectiveness. Finally, a preliminary analytical model of interlayer burr formation was created in order to better understand the burr formation process in stacked layers of sheet metal and to better understand the effect that each drilling parameter has on the resulting burr size.
|
23 |
Determination of process parameters for stamping and sheet hydroforming of sheet metal parts using finite element methodPalaniswamy, Hariharasudhan, January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Ohio State University, 2007. / Title from first page of PDF file. Includes bibliographical references (p. 265-278).
|
24 |
Process parameter optimisation of steel components laser forming using a Taguchi design of experiments approachSobetwa, Siyasanga January 2017 (has links)
A research report submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment,
University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements for
the degree of Master of Science in Engineering.
Date: September 2017, Johannesburg / The focus in this research investigation is to investigate the Process Parameter
Optimisation in Laser Beam Forming (LBF) process using the 4.4 kW Nd: YAG laser
system – Rofin DY 044 to form 200 x 50 x 3 mm3 mild steel - AISI 1008 samples. The
laser power P, beam diameter B, scan velocity V, number of scans N, and cooling flow
C were the five input parameters of interest in the investigation because of their
influence in the final formed product. Taguchi Design of Experiment (DoE) was used
for the selection and combination of input parameters for LBF process. The
investigation was done experimentally and computationally. Laser Beam Forming
(LBF) input parameters were categorised to three different levels, low (L), medium (M),
and high (H) laser forming (LBF) parameters to evaluate parameters that yield
maximum bending and better surface finish/quality. The conclusion drawn from LBF
process is that samples which are LBFormed using low parameter settings had
unnoticeable bending and good material surface finishing. On the other hand, samples
LBFormed using medium parameters yielded visible bending and non-smooth surface
finishing, while samples processed using high LBF parameters yielded maximum
bending and more surface roughness than the other two process parameters. / MT2018
|
Page generated in 0.0534 seconds