Dissertation--Universität Kassel, 2004. / Bibliogr. p. 293-308.

My thesis Bohemika in the castle library collection in Český Krumlov is devoted to the processing of the Czech collection of the castle library in Český Krumlov. The primary source are Czech books, which are now stored in the castle library. The Czech collection was developed by the aristocratic family of Schwarzenberg. In my thesis I deal not only with the general evaluation of this part of the collection, but also with the attitude of individual book owners towards the Czech language and literature. The thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter briefly describes the development of Český Krumlov Castle and the castle library, the second chapter is devoted to the general evaluation of the Czech collection in the library. The third chapter outlines the historical development of Schwarzenberg family in the concept of the castle library. There is a significant point of view of the owners of the Czech books and the access of the individual members to the Czech language and literature. The fourth chapter focuses in detail on the area of artistic literature and its presence in the castle library. The fifth chapter deals with the Czech collection of the castle library in Vrchotovy Janovice and its owners, particularly with the baroness Sidonie Nádherná from Borutín. The book collections of both the libraries are compared in the end of the thesis. The thesis also includes the catalogue of the Czech books, which I prepared and organized.

Cet essai fut écrit sur le mode de la promenade, d’une promenade accompagnée par les voix, des voix. Parmi elles, celle de Colette, de certains de ses personnages, celles contenues en moi. L’écriture a été libre, a tenté de l’être au moins, en se séparant de l’idée qu’un but précis, qu’une destination finale devait être atteinte. Il s’agissait de me laisser guider par l’errance des mots, par le rythme que prend la plume quand elle pense. De Colette, je ne dis rien, ou presque. Mon but étant de l’entendre, c’est en tant que lectrice que j’ai pris place dans cette réflexion, lectrice amoureuse, c’est-à-dire, guidée par l’En-Amour, conçu comme personnage conceptuel. C’est donc de ce point de vue que les textes ont été abordés, afin de laisser place à la vie, à la mouvance, à ce qui grouille dans l’œuvre colettienne. De cette manière, il me semblait possible d’entrer réellement en relation avec les personnages, mais aussi avec la représentation que je me faisais de l’auteure. Il me fallait garder la poésie de l’écriture de Colette, y entrelacer la mienne et tenter ainsi de donner des mots à une sorte de silencieuse oralité. Et le chemin s’est poursuivi, jusqu’à une vérité relative, vérité de l’En-Amour, donnée et mise en forme par les récits colettiens et leurs sous-entendus. De cette façon, je voyais la possibilité de redonner foi et valeur au(x) discours amoureux comme potentiel(s) de vérité. / This essay was written in the manner of a stroll, a stroll in the company of voices. Among them: Colette’s, certain of her characters’ and my very own inner voices. The writing process was a free-form one, tried to be so at least, separating itself from the idea of a precise goal or final destination to be reached. It was to be guided by the roaming of the words themselves instead, by the rhythm animating the pen when it is thinking. Of Colette, I say nothing, or barely. My objective being to hear her, it’s as a reader that I positioned myself thinking, as a loving reader guided by l’En-Amour, conceived as a conceptual character. The texts have thus been addressed from such a particular point of view, to let life, movement and all that sprouts in the colettian oeuvre its space to bloom. In such manner, it appeared possible to truly relate to both the characters and my own representation of the author. I had to keep alive the poetry of Colette’s writing, intertwining mine along with it, in an attempt to word a kind of unspoken oral form. And the path continued further along, up to a relative truth, the truth of l’En-Amour, given and shaped by the colettian narratives and their understated meanings. This way, I saw the possibility of valuing and renewing faith in a (the) discourse(s) of love as potential truth.

Cet essai fut écrit sur le mode de la promenade, d’une promenade accompagnée par les voix, des voix. Parmi elles, celle de Colette, de certains de ses personnages, celles contenues en moi. L’écriture a été libre, a tenté de l’être au moins, en se séparant de l’idée qu’un but précis, qu’une destination finale devait être atteinte. Il s’agissait de me laisser guider par l’errance des mots, par le rythme que prend la plume quand elle pense. De Colette, je ne dis rien, ou presque. Mon but étant de l’entendre, c’est en tant que lectrice que j’ai pris place dans cette réflexion, lectrice amoureuse, c’est-à-dire, guidée par l’En-Amour, conçu comme personnage conceptuel. C’est donc de ce point de vue que les textes ont été abordés, afin de laisser place à la vie, à la mouvance, à ce qui grouille dans l’œuvre colettienne. De cette manière, il me semblait possible d’entrer réellement en relation avec les personnages, mais aussi avec la représentation que je me faisais de l’auteure. Il me fallait garder la poésie de l’écriture de Colette, y entrelacer la mienne et tenter ainsi de donner des mots à une sorte de silencieuse oralité. Et le chemin s’est poursuivi, jusqu’à une vérité relative, vérité de l’En-Amour, donnée et mise en forme par les récits colettiens et leurs sous-entendus. De cette façon, je voyais la possibilité de redonner foi et valeur au(x) discours amoureux comme potentiel(s) de vérité. / This essay was written in the manner of a stroll, a stroll in the company of voices. Among them: Colette’s, certain of her characters’ and my very own inner voices. The writing process was a free-form one, tried to be so at least, separating itself from the idea of a precise goal or final destination to be reached. It was to be guided by the roaming of the words themselves instead, by the rhythm animating the pen when it is thinking. Of Colette, I say nothing, or barely. My objective being to hear her, it’s as a reader that I positioned myself thinking, as a loving reader guided by l’En-Amour, conceived as a conceptual character. The texts have thus been addressed from such a particular point of view, to let life, movement and all that sprouts in the colettian oeuvre its space to bloom. In such manner, it appeared possible to truly relate to both the characters and my own representation of the author. I had to keep alive the poetry of Colette’s writing, intertwining mine along with it, in an attempt to word a kind of unspoken oral form. And the path continued further along, up to a relative truth, the truth of l’En-Amour, given and shaped by the colettian narratives and their understated meanings. This way, I saw the possibility of valuing and renewing faith in a (the) discourse(s) of love as potential truth.

This thesis considers past autobiographical theory and questions whether it addresses the autobiography of the female writer. Autobiographies of Harriet Jacobs, Margaret Sanger, and Maxine Hong Kingston are examined to reveal their polyvocality, use of the autobiographical "I", and rhetorical strategies maintained in order to create a close relationship with the reader. Particular attention is paid to Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of dialogism and Sidonie Smith's autobiographical "I."