Stocking herbivorous aquatic organisms in wastewater treatment ponds specifically to control phytoplankton biomass and reduce suspended solids can provide small, rural communities with inexpensive, secondary wastewater treatment. The capability of several native fish species and the freshwater mussel, <i>Elliptio complanata</i>, to reduce suspended solids and phytoplankton was compared in laboratory and field enclosure experiments. Fathead minnows (<i>Pimephales promelas</i>), gizzard shad (<i>Dorosoma cepedianum</i>), and the common carp (<i>Cyprinus carpio</i>) had either no effect, or significantly increased suspended solids levels. None of the fish species consistently reduced concentrations of typical wastewater algal taxa. The ineffectiveness of fish was attributed to numerous algal characteristics such as cell size, shape, relative abundance, resistance to digestion, and palatability. In contrast, <i>E. complanata</i> consistently and substantially reduced both suspended solids and algae concentrations in wastewater. Small-sized algae and suspended particles were either directly assimilated, or removed from suspension as pseudofeces, further promoting clarification. The proportion of suspended solids and algae concentrations removed per individual mussel declined with increasing densities of mussels. Declines in suspended solids and algae attributable to mussel filtration were best described by semilogarithmic regression equations. Mean filtration rate of <i>E. complanata</i> ranged from 53 ml/h/mussel for colonial blue-green algae, to 134 ml/h/mussel for smaller green algae. The results of this study suggest that freshwater mussels can effectively control suspended solids and algae in eutrophic environments. / Master of Science

No description available.

Submitted in partial fulfillment of academic requirements for the degree of Masters of Technology: Department of Chemical Engineering, Durban University of Technology, 2009. / The primary objective of this project was to establish a screening protocol which could be used to access high strength/toxic effluent for toxicity and degradability prior to being disposed in wastewater treatment works. The serum bottle method (materials and method section) is simple, makes use of small glass vials (125 mℓ-volume were used in this research) which do not require any stirring nor feeding device or other engineered tool: a serum bottle is sealed immediately after all components are poured inside and thereafter conducted in a batch mode and occasionally shaken to ensure adequate homogenisation of the components. The only variables which are regularly measured are the volume of biogas produced and gas composition. The two assays, originally developed by Owen et al. (1979) to address the toxicity and the biodegradability have been combined in a single test called AAT, Anaerobic Activity Test, which enables one to assess simultaneously the inhibitory effect on the methanogenic biomass and the biodegradability of the test material as well as the ability of the biomass to adapt to the test material and therefore to overcome the initial inhibition. The screening protocol is illustrated in Annexure A. The protocol consists of a sequence of assays which employ the serum bottle methodology. A first step of the procedure is aimed at rapidly estimating whether the effluent is potentially toxic to the methanogenic biomass and in what concentration. The second step is a more extensive screening, aimed at precisely characterising the toxicity of the effluent, the extent of biodegradation that can be achieved, as well as at establishing whether a potential for adaptation of the biomass exists upon exposure. If the sample passes the screening stage, the same serum bottle method will be used to conduct a series of batch co-digestion experiments aimed at evaluating a convenient volumetric ratio between the test material and the readily biodegradable substrate. Finally, a laboratory-scale codigestion trial could simulate the full-scale process, thus enabling the selection of appropriate operating conditions for the start-up of the full-scale implementation. This the protocol has been used to assess the amenability to be anaerobically (co)digested of four industrial effluents, i.e. size and distillery effluents which are classified as high strength and scour and synthetic dye effluents classified as toxic. From the biodegradability and toxicity assays the following conclusions were drawn. The size and distillery effluent were found to be ii degradable at 32 g COD/ℓ and 16 g COD /ℓ concentrations respectively. Concentrations higher than these stipulated above were found inhibitory. Scour effluent was found to be recalcitrant at all concentration tested and synthetic dye was 100 % degradable at 0.12 g COD/ℓ and lower and highly inhibitory at concentration higher than 1.1 g COD/ℓ. Co-digestion experiment using serum bottle AAT method were undertaken between effluents i.e. size + distillery, size + scour, distillery + synthetic dye in an attempt to verify whether the digestion performance benefits from simultaneous presence of the two substrates. The volumetric ratios between the effluents were 1:1, 1:2, 2:1. The presence of two mixtures in the case of size and distillery had better methane production compared to individual substrate i.e. size or distillery separate. The mixture with volumetric flow rate ratio of 2:1 (size: distillery) was preferable in terms of process performance as it had highest COD removal compared to the other mixtures /ratios and individual substrates. The mixture of size and scour (2:1) had highest degradation percentage compared to other ratios but not high enough to qualify as degradable (less than 50 %). The mixture of distillery and synthetic dye had the same pattern with ratio of 2:1 giving the best COD conversion. The pattern than can be drawn from the degradability of mixtures is: the degradability of mixtures increase with the increasing amount of the most biodegradable compound/effluent in the mixture. Serum bottle results provided the detailed information regarding the safe operating parameters which should be used during the starting point for the larger scale investigation i.e. lab-scale investigations. The lab scale investigations were conducted primarily to validate screening and monitor how the digestion progresses and also to provide data for future project i.e. pilot plant investigation. Other effluents i.e. scour and synthetic dye and their co-digestion mixture were excluded from the lab-scale investigations since they were found to be non- biodegradable i.e. their COD conversion was less the 50 % in the screening protocol. Due to time constrains and other technical difficulties in the laboratory, the co-digestion of size and distillery mixture trials we not conducted on the laboratory scale. Laboratory-scale digestion trials showed that the best organic loading rate for distillery effluent in terms of reactor performance and stability was 1.0g COD/ℓ with efficiency of about 45 %, and for size was 2.0g COD/ℓ with an efficiency of 40 %. The efficiencies obtained in both effluents trials could be greatly improved by acclimation; however these results showed that the digestion of these effluents on the bigger scale is possible. / Water Research Commission

No description available.

Treatment of waste sludge has become an important issue in recent years around the world. However, the trend of waste sludge treatment has shifted from volume minimization and stabilization to reuse of the sludge and recover the energy potential of it. Therefore, anaerobic treatment of sludge is gaining popularity because of byproduct methane production and high percentage of VSS reduction. Pre-treatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion in order to increase methane production, and ozone pre-treatment in this context, is one such option. Domestic sludge also contains the recently recognized, so called, emerging compounds such as Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs). Therefore treatment of EDCs in sludge is another challenge in waste sludge treatment since direct discharge of such chemicals may harm the environment by causing gender shifts within the fauna. In this context two hormones (estrone and progesterone), three pharmaceuticals (acetaminophen, carbamazepine and diltiazem) and one plasticizer (benzyl-butyl phthalate) were routinely analyzed in sludge samples which were subjected to treatment during this study. Treatment of EDCs during anaerobic digestion and the effect of ozonation both on the performance of digestion and the treatability of EDCs were investigated in this study. Four 2.5L anaerobic jars were used for anaerobic digestion connected to four 1L plastic graduated cylinders immersed in salt-water to collect the off gas. Anaerobic sludge culture of the reactor and the sludge feed to the reactors were obtained from Ankara Tatlar Wastewater Treatment Plant anaerobic digester and return activated sludge (RAS) line, respectively. One of the anaerobic digesters was used as control (no ozonation) and the others were fed with sludge samples ozonated at three different ozone doses 0.65, 1.33 and 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass. Sludge ages of the reactors were initially set to 25 days and the reactors were fed once every 2 days. The TSS, VSS, total gas volume, COD, pH, CH4 percentage and EDCs were analyzed routinely. In the reactors, operated at 25 days, because of the observation of reduction of TSS, SRT was set to infinity / thus, sludge wastage was terminated. Following the startup it was seen that at 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass dose TSS and VSS did not stay constant in the reactor and dropped sharply in the course of operation, indicating that system was not steady at this SRT. However, upon stoppage of sludge wastage from the reactors, thereby setting SRT to infinity, a steady culture could be maintained in the reactors. Both total gas production and CH4 percentage increased with the increasing doses of ozone with respect to control reactor. For 2.65 mg/g ozonated reactor total gas volume doubled the amount produced in the control reactor. All the EDCs within the scope of this study were analyzed in sludge using ultrasound-aided sequential sludge extraction method twice a week and the results showed that ozonation affected treatment of EDCs for up to 96%. The highest removal rate was obtained with natural hormones. Rates of treatment of pharmaceuticals were the second best.

Treatment of waste sludge has become an important issue in recent years around the world. However, the trend of waste sludge treatment has shifted from volume minimization and stabilization to reuse of the sludge and recover the energy potential of it. Therefore, anaerobic treatment of sludge is gaining popularity because of byproduct methane production and high percentage of VSS reduction. Pre-treatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion in order to increase methane production, and ozone pre-treatment in this context, is one such option. Domestic sludge also contains the recently recognized, so called, emerging compounds such as Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs). Therefore treatment of EDCs in sludge is another challenge in waste sludge treatment since direct discharge of such chemicals may harm the environment by causing gender shifts within the fauna. In this context two hormones (estrone and progesterone), three pharmaceuticals (acetaminophen, carbamazepine and diltiazem) and one plasticizer (benzyl-butyl phthalate) were routinely analyzed in sludge samples which were subjected to treatment during this study. Treatment of EDCs during anaerobic digestion and the effect of ozonation both on the performance of digestion and the treatability of EDCs were investigated in this study. Four 2.5L anaerobic jars were used for anaerobic digestion connected to four 1L plastic graduated cylinders immersed in salt-water to collect the off gas. Anaerobic sludge culture of the reactor and the sludge feed to the reactors were obtained from Ankara Tatlar Wastewater Treatment Plant anaerobic digester and return activated sludge (RAS) line, respectively. One of the anaerobic digesters was used as control (no ozonation) and the others were fed with sludge samples ozonated at three different ozone doses 0.65, 1.33 and 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass. Sludge ages of the reactors were initially set to 25 days and the reactors were fed once every 2 days. The TSS, VSS, total gas volume, COD, pH, CH4 percentage and EDCs were analyzed routinely. In the reactors, operated at 25 days, because of the observation of reduction of TSS, SRT was set to infinity / thus, sludge wastage was terminated. Following the startup it was seen that at 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass dose TSS and VSS did not stay constant in the reactor and dropped sharply in the course of operation, indicating that system was not steady at this SRT. However, upon stoppage of sludge wastage from the reactors, thereby setting SRT to infinity, a steady culture could be maintained in the reactors. Both total gas production and CH4 percentage increased with the increasing doses of ozone with respect to control reactor. For 2.65 mg/g ozonated reactor total gas volume doubled the amount produced in the control reactor. All the EDCs within the scope of this study were analyzed in sludge using ultrasound-aided sequential sludge extraction method twice a week and the results showed that ozonation affected treatment of EDCs for up to 96%. The highest removal rate was obtained with natural hormones. Rates of treatment of pharmaceuticals were the second best.

Treatment of waste sludge has become an important issue in recent years around the world. However, the trend of waste sludge treatment has shifted from volume minimization and stabilization to reuse of the sludge and recover the energy potential of it. Therefore, anaerobic treatment of sludge is gaining popularity because of byproduct methane production and high percentage of VSS reduction. Pre-treatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion in order to increase methane production, and ozone pre-treatment in this context, is one such option. Domestic sludge also contains the recently recognized, so called, emerging compounds such as Endocrine Disrupting Compounds (EDCs). Therefore treatment of EDCs in sludge is another challenge in waste sludge treatment since direct discharge of such chemicals may harm the environment by causing gender shifts within the fauna. In this context two hormones (estrone and progesterone), three pharmaceuticals (acetaminophen, carbamazepine and diltiazem) and one plasticizer (benzyl-butyl phthalate) were routinely analyzed in sludge samples which were subjected to treatment during this study. Treatment of EDCs during anaerobic digestion and the effect of ozonation both on the performance of digestion and the treatability of EDCs were investigated in this study. Four 2.5L anaerobic jars were used for anaerobic digestion connected to four 1L plastic graduated cylinders immersed in salt-water to collect the off gas. Anaerobic sludge culture of the reactor and the sludge feed to the reactors were obtained from Ankara Tatlar Wastewater Treatment Plant anaerobic digester and return activated sludge (RAS) line, respectively. One of the anaerobic digesters was used as control (no ozonation) and the others were fed with sludge samples ozonated at three different ozone doses 0.65, 1.33 and 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass. Sludge ages of the reactors were initially set to 25 days and the reactors were fed once every 2 days. The TSS, VSS, total gas volume, COD, pH, CH4 percentage and EDCs were analyzed routinely. In the reactors, operated at 25 days, because of the observation of reduction of TSS, SRT was set to infinity / thus, sludge wastage was terminated. Following the startup it was seen that at 2.65 mg ozone/g biomass dose TSS and VSS did not stay constant in the reactor and dropped sharply in the course of operation, indicating that system was not steady at this SRT. However, upon stoppage of sludge wastage from the reactors, thereby setting SRT to infinity, a steady culture could be maintained in the reactors. Both total gas production and CH4 percentage increased with the increasing doses of ozone with respect to control reactor. For 2.65 mg/g ozonated reactor total gas volume doubled the amount produced in the control reactor. All the EDCs within the scope of this study were analyzed in sludge using ultrasound-aided sequential sludge extraction method twice a week and the results showed that ozonation affected treatment of EDCs for up to 96%. The highest removal rate was obtained with natural hormones. Rates of treatment of pharmaceuticals were the second best.

Anaerobic digestion (AD) is widely used in wastewater treatment plants for stabilisation of primary and waste activated sludges. Increasingly energy prices as well as stringent environmental and public health regulations ensure the ongoing popularity of anaerobic digestion. Reduction of volatile solids, methane production and pathogen reduction are the major objectives of anaerobic digestion. Phased anaerobic digestion is a promising technology that may allow improved volatile solids destruction and methane gas production. In AD models, microbially-mediated processes are described by functionally-grouped microorganisms. Ignoring the presence of functionally-different species in the separate phases may influence the output of AD modeling. The objective of this research was to thoroughly investigate the kinetics of hydrolysis, acetogenesis (i.e., propionate oxidation) and methanogenesis (i.e., acetoclastic) in phased anaerobic digestion systems. Using a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) technique, bacterial and archaeal communities were compared to complement kinetics studies. Four phased digesters including Mesophilic-Mesophilic, Thermophilic-Mesophilic, Thermophilic-Thermophilic and Mesophilic-Thermophilic were employed to investigate the influence of phase separation and temperature on the microbial activity of the digestion systems. Two more digesters were used as control, one at mesophilic 35 0C (C1) and one at thermophilic 55 0C (C2) temperatures. The HRTs in the first-phase, second-phase and single-phase digesters were approximately 3.5, 14, and 17 days, respectively. All the digesters were fed a mixture of primary and secondary sludges. Following achievement of steady-state in the digesters, a series of batch experiments were conducted off-line to study the impact of the digester conditions on the kinetics of above-mentioned processes. A Monod-type equation was used to study the kinetics of acetoclastic methanogens and POB in the digesters, while a first-order model was used for the investigation of hydrolysis kinetics. Application of an elevated temperature (55 0C) in the first-phase was found to be effective in enhancing solubilisation of particulate organics. This improvement was more significant for nitrogen-containing material (28%) as compared to the PCOD removal (5%) when the M1 and T1 digesters were compared. Among all the configurations, the highest PCOD removal was achieved in the T1T2 system (pvalue<0.05). In contrast to the solubilisation efficiencies, the mesophilic digesters (C1, M1M2 and T1M3) outperformed the thermophilic digesters (C2, T1T2 and M1T3) in COD removal. The highest COD removal was obtained in the T1M3 digestion system, indicating a COD removal efficiency of 50.7±2.1%. The DGGE fingerprints from digesters demonstrated that digester parameters (i.e., phase separation and temperature) influenced the structure of the bacterial and archaeal communities. This resulted in distinct clustering of DGGE profiles from the 1st-phase digesters as compared to the 2nd-phase digesters and from the mesophilic digesters as compared to the thermophilic ones. Based on the bio-kinetic parameters estimated for the various digesters and analysis of the confidence regions of the kinetic sets (kmax and Ks), the batch experiment studies revealed that the kinetic characteristics of the acetoclastic methanogens and POB developed in the heavily loaded digesters (M1 and T1) were different from those species developed in the remaining mesophilic digesters (M2, M3 and C1). As with the results from the mesophilic digesters, a similar observation was made for the thermophilic digesters. The species of acetoclastic methanogens and POB within the T1 digester had greater kmax and Ks values in comparison to the values of the T3 and C2 digesters. However, the bio-kinetic parameters of the T2 digester showed a confidence region that overlapped with both the T1 and T3 digesters. The acetate and propionate concentrations in the digesters supported these results. The acetate and propionate concentrations in the M1 digesters were, respectively, 338±48 and 219±17 mgCOD/L, while those of the M2, M3 and C1 digesters were less than 60 mg/L as COD. The acetate and propionate concentrations were, respectively, 872±38 and 1220±66 in T1 digester, whereas their concentrations ranged 140-184 and 209-309 mg/L as COD in the T2, T3 and C2 digesters. In addition, the DGGE results displayed further evidence on the differing microbial community in the 1st- and 2nd-phase digesters. Two first-order hydrolysis models (single- and dual-pathway) were employed to study the hydrolysis process in the phased and single-stage digesters. The results demonstrated that the dual-pathway hydrolysis model better fit the particulate COD solubilisation as compared to the single-pathway model. The slowly (F0,s) and rapidly (F0,r) hydrolysable fractions of the raw sludge were 36% and 25%, respectively. A comparison of the estimated coefficients for the mesophilic digesters revealed that the hydrolysis coefficients (both Khyd,s and Khyd,r) of the M1 digester were greater than those of the M2 and M3 digesters. In the thermophilic digesters it was observed that the Khyd,r value of the T1 digester differed from those of the T2, T3 and C2 digesters; whereas, the hydrolysis rate of slowly hydrolysable matter (i.e., Khyd,s) did not differ significantly among these digesters. The influence of the facultative bacteria, that originated from the WAS fraction of the raw sludge, and/or the presence of hydrolytic biomass with different enzymatic systems may have contributed to the different hydrolysis rates in the M1 and T1 digesters from the corresponding mesophilic (i.e, M2 and M3) and thermophilic (i.e., T2 and T3) 2nd-phase digesters.

published_or_final_version / Civil and Structural Engineering / Master / Master of Philosophy

Submitted in partial fulfillment of academic requirements for the degree of Masters of Technology: Department of Chemical Engineering, Durban University of Technology, 2009. / The primary objective of this project was to establish a screening protocol which could be used to access high strength/toxic effluent for toxicity and degradability prior to being disposed in wastewater treatment works. The serum bottle method (materials and method section) is simple, makes use of small glass vials (125 mℓ-volume were used in this research) which do not require any stirring nor feeding device or other engineered tool: a serum bottle is sealed immediately after all components are poured inside and thereafter conducted in a batch mode and occasionally shaken to ensure adequate homogenisation of the components. The only variables which are regularly measured are the volume of biogas produced and gas composition. The two assays, originally developed by Owen et al. (1979) to address the toxicity and the biodegradability have been combined in a single test called AAT, Anaerobic Activity Test, which enables one to assess simultaneously the inhibitory effect on the methanogenic biomass and the biodegradability of the test material as well as the ability of the biomass to adapt to the test material and therefore to overcome the initial inhibition. The screening protocol is illustrated in Annexure A. The protocol consists of a sequence of assays which employ the serum bottle methodology. A first step of the procedure is aimed at rapidly estimating whether the effluent is potentially toxic to the methanogenic biomass and in what concentration. The second step is a more extensive screening, aimed at precisely characterising the toxicity of the effluent, the extent of biodegradation that can be achieved, as well as at establishing whether a potential for adaptation of the biomass exists upon exposure. If the sample passes the screening stage, the same serum bottle method will be used to conduct a series of batch co-digestion experiments aimed at evaluating a convenient volumetric ratio between the test material and the readily biodegradable substrate. Finally, a laboratory-scale codigestion trial could simulate the full-scale process, thus enabling the selection of appropriate operating conditions for the start-up of the full-scale implementation. This the protocol has been used to assess the amenability to be anaerobically (co)digested of four industrial effluents, i.e. size and distillery effluents which are classified as high strength and scour and synthetic dye effluents classified as toxic. From the biodegradability and toxicity assays the following conclusions were drawn. The size and distillery effluent were found to be ii degradable at 32 g COD/ℓ and 16 g COD /ℓ concentrations respectively. Concentrations higher than these stipulated above were found inhibitory. Scour effluent was found to be recalcitrant at all concentration tested and synthetic dye was 100 % degradable at 0.12 g COD/ℓ and lower and highly inhibitory at concentration higher than 1.1 g COD/ℓ. Co-digestion experiment using serum bottle AAT method were undertaken between effluents i.e. size + distillery, size + scour, distillery + synthetic dye in an attempt to verify whether the digestion performance benefits from simultaneous presence of the two substrates. The volumetric ratios between the effluents were 1:1, 1:2, 2:1. The presence of two mixtures in the case of size and distillery had better methane production compared to individual substrate i.e. size or distillery separate. The mixture with volumetric flow rate ratio of 2:1 (size: distillery) was preferable in terms of process performance as it had highest COD removal compared to the other mixtures /ratios and individual substrates. The mixture of size and scour (2:1) had highest degradation percentage compared to other ratios but not high enough to qualify as degradable (less than 50 %). The mixture of distillery and synthetic dye had the same pattern with ratio of 2:1 giving the best COD conversion. The pattern than can be drawn from the degradability of mixtures is: the degradability of mixtures increase with the increasing amount of the most biodegradable compound/effluent in the mixture. Serum bottle results provided the detailed information regarding the safe operating parameters which should be used during the starting point for the larger scale investigation i.e. lab-scale investigations. The lab scale investigations were conducted primarily to validate screening and monitor how the digestion progresses and also to provide data for future project i.e. pilot plant investigation. Other effluents i.e. scour and synthetic dye and their co-digestion mixture were excluded from the lab-scale investigations since they were found to be non- biodegradable i.e. their COD conversion was less the 50 % in the screening protocol. Due to time constrains and other technical difficulties in the laboratory, the co-digestion of size and distillery mixture trials we not conducted on the laboratory scale. Laboratory-scale digestion trials showed that the best organic loading rate for distillery effluent in terms of reactor performance and stability was 1.0g COD/ℓ with efficiency of about 45 %, and for size was 2.0g COD/ℓ with an efficiency of 40 %. The efficiencies obtained in both effluents trials could be greatly improved by acclimation; however these results showed that the digestion of these effluents on the bigger scale is possible.