Spelling suggestions: "subject:"small cub airports"" "subject:"small cub irports""
1 |
Incorporating Sustainability Planning in Airport Master Plans: A Case Study of Six U.S Small Hub AirportsCaroline K Marete (6199067) 14 May 2019 (has links)
<div>
<p>The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) <i>Report on the Sustainable Master Plan Pilot
Program and Lessons Learned </i>published in December 2012 showed that airports
of all sizes can benefit from incorporating sustainability in their master
plans. Global aviation organizations such as the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) and Airports Council International (ACI) have been in the
forefront in championing aviation sustainability. While incorporating
sustainability in airport planning is highly encouraged, there are challenges
associated with such a process. Some of the challenges experienced by airport
managers in planning and implementation sustainability are lack of financial
capability, and lack of skilled sustainability specialists. In 2009, FAA launched
the Airport Sustainability - Airport Improvement Program (AIP), to provide
grants to airports that were willing to invest the time and resources in
preparing airport master plans that incorporate sustainability issues. To date,
44 airports have been funded through the FAA Airport Sustainability AIP grant.
Six of the 44 airports are in the category of small hub airports as classified
by the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). The objective of
this study is to gain an in-depth understanding of the approaches to
sustainability planning used by the six small hub airports in the FAA program.
The researcher chose a case study design to conduct an exploratory case study with
multiple cases. The results of the study show that the approaches used by the
six airports vary depending on the specific airport needs and resources
available. Based on the study results, the researcher concludes there are more
similarities than differences in the approaches airports have used to
incorporate sustainability in the master planning process.</p>
</div>
<br>
|
2 |
A Low-Cost Technology to Assess Aircraft Noise at Non-Towered General Aviation AirportsChuyang Yang (13163034) 27 July 2022 (has links)
<p> </p>
<p>Aircraft noise is one of the most significant environmental concerns for the aviation industry, and it adversely affects the physical and mental health of community members who are in close proximity to airports. The operations and expansion of airports and land use planning are affected because of the community’s adverse reaction to such annoyances. Aircraft operations and fleet mix information are required when airport managers and stakeholders execute the Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) to compute the noise metrics; however, these data are unavailable from over 2,000 United States non-primary General Aviation (GA) airports that lack full-time air traffic control facilities or personnel. </p>
<p>This study developed a low-cost noise assessment technology for non-towered GA airports. The Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) messages were obtained using an inexpensive ADS-B receiver. A barometric pressure calibration was applied to improve the aircraft operations estimation. A fleet mix database was created by linking the collected ADS-B data to an FAA-registered aircraft database containing U.S.-registered aircraft information (such as types of aircraft and engines). Specific aircraft information was obtained by filtering the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) identification code from the obtained ADS-B records. A set of 20 advanced aircraft performance parameters was constructed to determine the operation mode and corresponding power setting. The corresponding noise levels were determined using the EUROCONTROL Aircraft Noise and Performance (ANP) database.</p>
<p>The testing and validation results from the case study at the Purdue University Airport (ICAO Code: KLAF) demonstrated the developed low-cost approach could identify aircraft noise events, and the accuracy of modeled noise data was assessed with an average error of 4.50 dBA. Therefore, the developed approach appears to be an affordable means of monitoring aircraft noise at non-towered GA airports. </p>
|
Page generated in 0.05 seconds