M.Phil. / Past apartheid policies promoted separate development and inevitably affected the economic and social growth of the majority of the South African population. Furthermore, the massive inequalities in income, unemployment, education, health, housing, roads, water and sanitation and the status created by these policies also affected social cohesion, undermined efficiency and economic growth and contributed to a higher level of social unrest and crime, which in turn undermined democracy and development. Two years into the democratic dispensation, the government felt obliged to constrain the pursuit of its ambitious programme and to adhere to the imperatives of a stabilization programme, which restricted the degree to which government proactively pursued a social reform agenda and developmental strategy. A number of reasons are offered for the fundamental shift in policy from the pre-1994 developmental state-led agenda to the post- 1996 market-based approach to both social and economic policy. Even today, the legacy of apartheid is still visible as it was during the height of the apartheid era, and this is reflected in the mushrooming of informal settlements and the illegal occupation of some land demarcated for other purposes. Even now the concepts of providing social security and the obligation of South African government to provide for social security are still new. The issue of social security has developed rapidly since the latter part of the 20 th century. In most democratic states, the obligation to provide social security is entrenched in their constitutions. Before it was entrenched it was up to the individual and the family to provide adequate protection for their families, but today things have changed. The problem with the current South African social security system is that it does not cover rural and urban poor, non-citizen migrant workers and the informally employed. The informally employed and the urban and rural poor do not enjoy any social security protection, unless they are able to meet the most stringent qualifying conditions for any of the social grants. Non-citizen migrant workers also fall largely outside the social security framework that exists in South Africa. Due to the lack of definition, presently there is no uniform definition of social security and this has resulted in various international definitions being used. On the other hand, in an attempt to address the disparity, the South African White Paper for Social Welfare defines social protection as "policies that ensure adequate economic and social protection during unemployment, ill health, maternity, child rearing, widowhood, disability and old age". Social security is one of the means by which people circumvent destitution: it provides for their basic needs when their income stream has ceased, has been disrupted or has not developed sufficiently. The concept of social security has been defined as the "body of arrangements shaping the solidarity with people facing (the threat of) a lack of earnings (i.e. income from paid labour) or particular costs"'. Moreover, it embraces the sphere of complete protection against human damage, an adequate standard of living and social safety net against destitution through preventative measures. In light of the above challenges, it is important that we should have a comprehensive integrated social security structure. This is so because the traditional approach or the Western-oriented approach is used in South Africa and as a result it does not cover the characteristics of the African context efficiently. This includes, among other things, the formal sector-based orientation of the traditional social security model and the risks to which many Africans are exposed. It is of great importance for South Africa to develop its own definition of social security for historical reasons and the country's unique social and economic characteristics. The general objective of this dissertation is to look at possible amendments to the present system in order to provide for a more comprehensive scope of coverage of the present social security. It is also important for South African purposes, and/or in accordance with latest developments internationally, to adopt a wider social protection approach rather than rely on a more limited social notion. Therefore, this dissertation will develop a global analysis of the position of non-citizen migrants in South Africa social security law and its impact on employment relations and labour law in South African. This will provide the basis for developing a future strategy for extending higher levels of protection to non-migrant workers who are entering the country and to meet international social security obligations by introducing changes to national legislation. This will also include possible scenarios for improving the position of many people in South Africa. The dissertation will also cover the issue of how our courts have dealt with these violations. The other aim of the study is to analyze the position of the rural and urban poor and the informally employed from a comparative and empirical point of view. This will offer indigents the prospect of a future strategy for extended levels of protection by the creation of specific mechanisms and by introducing changes in national legislation. Finally, the lack of a coherent approach in South Africa social security is clearly discernible and needs to be researched properly and rectified. The present system suggests an archaic and rigid distinction between social insurance and social assistance. In light with the above challenges, it is important that we should have a comprehensive integrated social security structure. This is so because the traditional approach, or the Western-oriented approach, is used in South Africa and as a result it does not cover the characteristics of the African context efficiently.

LL.D. / In hierdie studie word ondersoek ingestel na die beregbaarheid van sosiale sekerheidsregte as 'n fundamentele reg wat deur die Grondwet verskans word. Die konsep "sosiale sekerheid" is as fundamentele reg bekend gestel in die Suid- Afrikaanse regsisteem deur die insluiting van die reg op toegang tot sosiale sekerheid in artikel 27(1)(c) van die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 108 van 1996. Artikel 27(1)(c) bepaal soos voig: Elkeen het die reg op toegang tot sosiale sekerheid, met inbegrip van gepaste sosiale bystand indien hulle nie in staat is om hulself en hul afhanklikes te onderhou nie. Artikel 27(2) bepaal soos voig: Die staat moet redelike wetgewende en ander maatreels tref om binne sy beskikbare middele elk van hierdie regte in toenemende mate te verwesenlik. Alhoewel die reg op sosiale sekerheid spesifieke vermeiding in artikel 27(1)(c) geniet, bestaan daar ook ander regte in die Handves van Regte wat as vertakkings of bepaalde risiko's van 'n sosiale sekerheidstelsel beskou kan word. Dit is die reg op toegang tot mediese sorg, die reg op voedsel en water, die reg op toegang tot geskikte behuising, die regte van kinders op sorg, basiese voeding, skuiling, basiese gesondheidsorg- en maatskaplike dienste. Wanneer daar dus na sosiale sekerheidsregte verwys word, sal dit al bogenoemde bepalings insluit. Die term "sosiale sekerheid" in plaas van "maatskaplike sekerheid" sal ook gebruik word omdat eersgenoemde 'n wyer aanwending as Iaasgenoemde het.

The inclusion of the right of access to social security in the Constitution did not meet with wholehearted approval in South Africa. This right, however, is of vital importance for the future upliftment of the country. The present social security system is based upon a clear distinction between social assistance and social insurance. There is a gap in current social security provisions in that the unemployed middle aged individual is not covered. Unemployment itself is one of the greatest challenges obscuring the implementation of a comprehensive social security system. The Constitutional right is to have ‘access’ to social security and the amount of resources at the state’s disposal is directly related to increasing this right, although it is true that a number of available resources are misspent. The state must take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of the right of access to social security. The principles of solidarity and ubuntu must be cultivated so that national social development becomes a concern for all citizens. There are numerous problems facing South Africans in attaining the goal of access to social security – even if national social development does become a priority. Budgetary constraints, poverty, unemployment, HIV/Aids and foreigners are examples of these. By making social security a priority for everyone, existing ideas (almost all of which have merit) may be converted into long-term solutions for poverty and unemployment. Currently, numerous opportunities to salvage the situation are being overlooked as a result of the lack of a comprehensive and structured plan to better the access to social security. The constitutional right of access to social security is enforceable, although the jurisprudence in this field remains underdeveloped. Conditions are currently favourable, within the country and beyond its borders, for an imaginative and concerted attempt to be made to find potential solutions. It is possible for resources to be increased and for tax benefits to be incorporated for businesses which have the capacity to contribute. The issue of defence spending is controversial, but could hold the key to lowering unemployment. Should jobs be created, it is likely that they will initially be of a temporary nature. Consequently, provisions are needed to ensure some guarantee of income in the lacuna between when a job is lost and another found. Ultimately, one thing is certain: the constitutional right of access to social security will only be complete once the people who are recipients of this right make sacrifices and create corresponding duties for themselves to ensure that the next generation of inhabitants of this country are not facing similar problems. The state’s goal should be to ensure that the basic rights which all people enjoy in terms of the Constitution (in particular the other socio-economic rights) are guaranteed for the duration of their existence, even if the level of benefits received by such people is low.

The legal position of asylum seekers in South African social security system is more nuanced as a result of their transitional stay or status in the country. Asylum seekers may often be present in South Africa for a quite a long time but their social security entitlement is more restricted, and similar to that of temporary residents. For example, asylum seekers’ social security position is completely different from that of refugees. Refugees enjoy the same social security treatment similarly to South African citizens and permanent residents. Refugees qualify for the constitutionally entrenched right to have access to social security, including appropriate social assistance. Refugees also qualify for other socio-economic rights contained in the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. The exclusion of asylum seekers occurs despite the fact they are one of the vulnerable groups of noncitizens. Such exclusion forces asylum seekers to live under precarious conditions. It is fundamentally accepted that the drafters of the Constitution included the right to have access to social security, in order to ensure that everyone, irrespective of nationality and citizenship enjoys an acceptable standard of living. It is also fundamentally accepted that the right to have access to social security contained in section 27(1)(c) is limited by section 27(2) of the Constitution. Section 27(2) requires the State to take reasonable legislative measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of the right to have access to social security. The South African courts had on several occasions confirmed that the content of section 27(1)(c) is limited by section 27(2) of the Constitution and that the state cannot implement the right to have access to social security on demand. It had also been confirmed that the right to have access to social security is enforceable. This means the beneficiaries of this right may seek recourse from the courts of law when they are not satisfied about the progress relating to the implementation of the programmes relevant to the right to have access to social security. The right to have access to social security is also limited by section 36(1) of the Constitution. In the international arena, the right to have access to social security is recognised as the entitlement of everyone, but in some instances differential treatment can be made by the states. Such differential treatment should serve the legitimate state objective and all noncitizens should be treated equally.

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2016-08-11T13:20:10Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniele de Mattos Carreira.pdf: 813025 bytes, checksum: 214a4311d029cae70eb923a0f668d42f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-11T13:20:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Daniele de Mattos Carreira.pdf: 813025 bytes, checksum: 214a4311d029cae70eb923a0f668d42f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-03-22 / This paper conducts a study on the jurisprudential disagreement on social rights, starting, therefore, from the interpretation of the rule. With thesis and antithesis, bringing de advantages and disadvantages of jurisprudential divergence, it seeks to reach the synthesis, in the conclusion, stating what would be more advantageous to the effectiveness of social security rights / presente trabalho realiza um estudo sobre a divergência jurisprudencial em matéria de direito social, partindo-se, para tanto, da interpretação da norma. Com tese e antítese, trazendo as vantagens e desvantagens da divergência jurisprudencial, busca-se alcançar a síntese, na conclusão, com o que seria mais vantajoso à efetividade dos direitos previdenciários

Thesis (M. Dev.) -- University of Limpopo, 2016 / In attacking poverty in post-apartheid South Africa, the country’s new government adopted a multiple approach focusing on building institutions and organisations on a macro regional and local level, levels to facilitate growth, reconstruction and social upliftment. In its effort to alleviate poverty and inequality, the Government of South Africa introduced a social security system. In an endeavour to address the deficiencies surrounding this system, the government has established a number of mechanisms. In order to distribute these grants to the right people in the right place, the government formed the South African Social Security Agency (SASSA). The research problem was, therefore, to find out how the management and administration of social security by SASSA is enhancing or retarding access to the services for which the agency was established to render. The aim of this study was to assess how the management and administration of the social security system impact on the accessibility of social services by those who require them. In order to achieve the aim of this study, the following objectives were addressed: how social security is managed in the Limpopo Province; to assess the impact of the management of the system on access to services; to identify possible strategies that could enhance access to social security services; and to provide recommendations based on the literature and research findings. The findings of this study was that the administration system of the South African grant system has been somewhat cumbersome for both the applicant and the administrator because the forms used for most grants are detailed and often quite technical. Furthermore, it was established that were service delivery challenges of severe staff shortages at critical operational levels where grant applications are processed and infrastructural challenges such as insufficient office space (too many staff members in a specific office) and insufficient or no connectivity at certain service delivery points. These are all organisational challenges that SASSA is facing. This research recommend that the Limpopo regional office must not only be responsible for giving information about newly enrolled recipients to the SASSA national office but the regional office should be able to complete the whole process within its offices without passing it on to the national office The research also recommends that a Monitoring and Evaluation unit must be established in regional offices. This unit will assist the management and administration of social grants in particular with improving services. This unit will visit different SASSA offices in the local municipalities on a regular basis in order to evaluate the performance of those particular offices. This will help to monitor the service delivery to the beneficiaries. Lastly, SASSA should do more research and development in consultation academic institutions or by structure within SASSA offices

Thesis (LLM. (Labour Law)) -- University of Limpopo, 2012 / The amendment of section 30I (3) of the Pension Funds Act No.24 of 1956 by the provisions of section 30I of the Pension Funds Amendment Act No.11 of 2007 poses a serious threat to the constitutional right to social security (Section 27 (1) (c) of the Constitution). The amendment places this challenge on this right because it places some form of time-barring on the member of the fund or the complainant (his or her dependent) when lodging a pension funds complaint after a prescribed time has elapsed (three years) and the Adjudicator will no longer have no powers to condone such a late referral despite good cause shown and prospects of success on the part of the complainant. The said amendment has placed the poor more especially those in the rural areas in a disadvantageous position, because most of them are illiterate and not aware of their pension law rights. This means that even though they are entitled to the pension funds benefits, they cannot access it if they lodged their complaint outside the three-year period.

Thesis (LLM> (Labour Law)) -- University og Limpopo, 2013 / The South African government has paid compensation in a form of special pension to individuals who have been exposed to certain types of hardship and suffering caused by the governments or their predecessors. This compensation is described as ‘the appreciation or sense of guilty of society towards those people on whom the government has rightfully or wrongfully and at any rate disproportionally inflicted damage’. Government have been prepared to pay compensation to the following persons: former enemies, victims of war, victims of harmful compulsory vaccination measures, persons who had sacrificed their jobs and education in the process of overturning oppressive governments establishing democratic government; and persons whose basic human rights had been violated by governments or their predecessors. These persons have sacrificed their lives either in exile or within South Africa fighting for South Africa to be democratic. These persons must prove that they served their respective political organisations for a period of five years or above or they were banished or restricted in certain area or imprisoned or sentenced.

Thesis (LLM. (Labour Law)) -- University of Limpopo, 2013 / The South African government has paid compensation in a form of special pension to individuals who have been exposed to certain types of hardship and suffering caused by the governments or their predecessors. This compensation is described as ‘the appreciation or sense of guilty of society towards those people on whom the government has rightfully or wrongfully and at any rate disproportionally inflicted damage’. Government have been prepared to pay compensation to the following persons: former enemies, victims of war, victims of harmful compulsory vaccination measures, persons who had sacrificed their jobs and education in the process of overturning oppressive governments establishing democratic government; and persons whose basic human rights had been violated by governments or their predecessors. These persons have sacrificed their lives either in exile or within South Africa fighting for South Africa to be democratic. These persons must prove that they served their respective political organisations for a period of five years or above or they were banished or restricted in certain area or imprisoned or sentenced.

The South African Constitution in section 27(1)(c) obligates the state to develop a comprehensive social security system. It affirms the universal right to access to social security, including appropriate social assistance for those unable to support themselves and their dependants. It orders the state to take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of these rights. The underlying normative commitment of social security is the improvement of the quality of life of the population by promoting economic or material equality. Social security ensures that all citizens have a stake in society and that each individual has an incentive to contribute to the development of the commonwealth. It plays a crucial role in the lives of communities and families viewed in the context of social transfers which provide broader development objectives and tackles income poverty transfers. The objectives of this study are threefold. Firstly, it examines the extension of social assistance coverage to the indigents in South Africa. Secondly, it looks at the legal mechanisms employed by courts and government in order to improve the social security rights of the poor in South Africa. Thirdly, the research investigates the possible reform and trends in India and Brazil with the aim of improving South Africa’s system of social security. For the avoidance of doubt, the law evaluated in this work is at 15 September 2015. / Jurisprudence / LL. D.