Este trabalho procurou unir dois temas que, embora sejam muito relevantes, parecem trilhar caminhos independentes na administração: a avaliação de desempenho organizacional e as empresas brasileiras de desenvolvimento de software. Se, por um lado, a avaliação de desempenho organizacional pretende fornecer ferramentas e processos que auxiliem os gestores na condução de seus negócios, por outro lado, o desenvolvimento de software é tido como um setor que gera empregos de alta qualificação e que exporta um produto ou serviço com margens reais bem mais altas que aquelas registradas pela pauta tradicional de exportação. Nesse cenário, uma pesquisa de interesse é entender como é que as empresas brasileiras de desenvolvimento de software fazem avaliação de desempenho organizacional. Para cumprir com os objetivos deste trabalho exploratório, foi utilizada uma abordagem tanto qualitativa (dois estudos de caso) quanto quantitativa (16 respondentes de survey). Como resultados preliminares, há indicação de que existe um processo de amadurecimento da avaliação de desempenho das empresas de desenvolvimento de software e esse amadurecimento inclui a diminuição da importância atribuída ao curtíssimo prazo e o aumento da importância do médio e longo prazos. Estágios mais avançados desse amadurecimento devem incluir níveis cada vez maiores de sistematização das práticas de avaliação de desempenho e também devem privilegiar determinadas dimensões de avaliação. Em relação à percepção e à prática, também como resultados preliminares, percebe-se que as empresas não consideram importante preocuparem-se com as dimensões sociais e de meio-ambiente e não acreditam que eles gerem impactos positivos nos indicadores financeiros e, talvez, por esse motivo, as práticas são pouco maduras. Por fim, e talvez o resultado preliminar mais importante (até surpreendente), as empresas consideram que ter inovação e pessoas motivadas e desenvolvidas tecnicamente são as dimensões mais importantes e as que geram mais impactos positivos nos indicadores financeiros, mas elas não sabem ou não conseguem implementar indicadores para mensurá-las adequadamente. / This study has tried to bind two subjects of utmost importance but that seems to have independent pathways in Management: organizational performance measurement and Brazilian software development companies. On the one hand, organizational performance measurement intends to offer tools and processes so that managers can improve the way they run their businesses; on the other hand, the software development industry generates highly qualified jobs and exports goods and services with higher margins when compared to the Brazilian traditional export basket. As a result, a research of interest should ask how Brazilian software development companies are conducting organizational performance measurement. In order to comply with the goals of this exploratory study, both qualitative (two study cases) and quantitative (16 respondents of a survey) approaches were applied. Preliminary findings show that evidences lead to the existence of a performance measurement maturation process that software development companies undergo. According to this maturation process, companies shift their focus from the short term to the medium and long terms. More matured companies may experience a growing performance measurement systematization, even if it is non-declared at the beginning, and they should also privilege certain measurement perspectives. Regarding perception and practice, preliminary results show that companies do not perceive social and environmental perspectives as important, and they believe these perspectives do not have positive impacts on financial indicators. Consequently, practices related to these perspectives are not matured. Finally, the most important-even surprising-preliminary findings show companies believe that producing innovation and having motivated and well-trained employees are the most important perspectives to their businesses and they have positive impacts on financial indicators. Nevertheless, they do not know or they are unable to adequately implement performance measurement indicators of these perspectives.

Este trabalho procurou unir dois temas que, embora sejam muito relevantes, parecem trilhar caminhos independentes na administração: a avaliação de desempenho organizacional e as empresas brasileiras de desenvolvimento de software. Se, por um lado, a avaliação de desempenho organizacional pretende fornecer ferramentas e processos que auxiliem os gestores na condução de seus negócios, por outro lado, o desenvolvimento de software é tido como um setor que gera empregos de alta qualificação e que exporta um produto ou serviço com margens reais bem mais altas que aquelas registradas pela pauta tradicional de exportação. Nesse cenário, uma pesquisa de interesse é entender como é que as empresas brasileiras de desenvolvimento de software fazem avaliação de desempenho organizacional. Para cumprir com os objetivos deste trabalho exploratório, foi utilizada uma abordagem tanto qualitativa (dois estudos de caso) quanto quantitativa (16 respondentes de survey). Como resultados preliminares, há indicação de que existe um processo de amadurecimento da avaliação de desempenho das empresas de desenvolvimento de software e esse amadurecimento inclui a diminuição da importância atribuída ao curtíssimo prazo e o aumento da importância do médio e longo prazos. Estágios mais avançados desse amadurecimento devem incluir níveis cada vez maiores de sistematização das práticas de avaliação de desempenho e também devem privilegiar determinadas dimensões de avaliação. Em relação à percepção e à prática, também como resultados preliminares, percebe-se que as empresas não consideram importante preocuparem-se com as dimensões sociais e de meio-ambiente e não acreditam que eles gerem impactos positivos nos indicadores financeiros e, talvez, por esse motivo, as práticas são pouco maduras. Por fim, e talvez o resultado preliminar mais importante (até surpreendente), as empresas consideram que ter inovação e pessoas motivadas e desenvolvidas tecnicamente são as dimensões mais importantes e as que geram mais impactos positivos nos indicadores financeiros, mas elas não sabem ou não conseguem implementar indicadores para mensurá-las adequadamente. / This study has tried to bind two subjects of utmost importance but that seems to have independent pathways in Management: organizational performance measurement and Brazilian software development companies. On the one hand, organizational performance measurement intends to offer tools and processes so that managers can improve the way they run their businesses; on the other hand, the software development industry generates highly qualified jobs and exports goods and services with higher margins when compared to the Brazilian traditional export basket. As a result, a research of interest should ask how Brazilian software development companies are conducting organizational performance measurement. In order to comply with the goals of this exploratory study, both qualitative (two study cases) and quantitative (16 respondents of a survey) approaches were applied. Preliminary findings show that evidences lead to the existence of a performance measurement maturation process that software development companies undergo. According to this maturation process, companies shift their focus from the short term to the medium and long terms. More matured companies may experience a growing performance measurement systematization, even if it is non-declared at the beginning, and they should also privilege certain measurement perspectives. Regarding perception and practice, preliminary results show that companies do not perceive social and environmental perspectives as important, and they believe these perspectives do not have positive impacts on financial indicators. Consequently, practices related to these perspectives are not matured. Finally, the most important-even surprising-preliminary findings show companies believe that producing innovation and having motivated and well-trained employees are the most important perspectives to their businesses and they have positive impacts on financial indicators. Nevertheless, they do not know or they are unable to adequately implement performance measurement indicators of these perspectives.

The purpose of this master thesis is to test an individual influence of separate factors on a mobile software development company’s position in a rating of Top Grossing applications in Asian countries, explain how these factors could be interpreted from a modified 4P framework perspective and understand how a mobile developer can adjust its strategy based on the identified factors. The research is based on a ranking data of 90 finance management applications for iPhone on the App Store of China, South Korea and Japan. The hypotheses about an existence of causal relationships between the identified factors and software’s position in the rating of Top Grossing finance mobile applications were tested. The research is based on a multiple regression analysis, conducted separately on the Chinese, South Korean and Japanese markets.   In the findings of the research the authors state that a position of financial mobile software in the Apple App Store rating of Top Grossing applications is determined by a unique set of factors, which vary across the studied Asian markets, while a number of factors converge. The models designed for the markets of China, South Korea and Japan allow to identify which factors can potentially elevate the position of an application in the rating of the most profit generating financial programs (Top Grossing rating) and based on that gain an understanding of the way a mobile software company’s marketing strategy could be adjusted to better meet customers’ needs on the studied markets.   The originality of this master thesis is in the development of a new approach to the analysis of a mobile software development company’s performance regarding its position in Top Grossing ranking. Since the market of mobile applications emerged only in 2008 the factors influencing the performance of mobile developing companies have not been theoretically discussed before.

Enterprise Architecture endeavours to resolve the complexity of increasingly distributed systems by aligning business vision with IT strategy, which in turn should reduce the overall costs of IT in the business and provide simpler, better and faster solutions to business problems. There are many Enterprise Architecture frameworks. The main purpose of most of these frameworks is to assist with the challenges of managing the increased complexity of distributed systems, aligning business vision with IT strategy and reducing IT costs. Many of the studies which produced the results stating Enterprise Architecture aligns business vision and reduces IT costs, were based on Zachman’s work, and most of the published Enterprise Architecture success stories focus on the benefits provided to the company with regards to IT. In contrast very little documentation could be found that addresses the impact of Enterprise Architecture implementations on the individuals and systems within a company. If the individuals as the main implementers of any strategy are impacted negatively by Enterprise Architecture management decisions, there would be a negative impact on the return on investment of the company. Enterprise Architecture allows the use of overlapping departments’ processes and data, which translates into less development time as system components would already exist. Changes that are made to the Enterprise Architecture result in several additional changes that had to be implemented by the software developers. These changes influenced the workload, roles and responsibilities of the developers in such a way that the development team became negative about the additional work. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Enterprise Architecture management decisions on the responsibilities, work experience and attitude towards Enterprise Architecture of the software developers in a company that develops software by exploring and describing the nature of software development. Based on the findings of this study, a list of impact of Enterprise Architecture decisions on the responsibilities of software developers in companies that develop software were identified. In this respect, the study identified impacts of Enterprise Architecture management decisions as well as possible solutions to these impacts. / Computing / M. Sc. (Information Systems)

Enterprise Architecture endeavours to resolve the complexity of increasingly distributed systems by aligning business vision with IT strategy, which in turn should reduce the overall costs of IT in the business and provide simpler, better and faster solutions to business problems. There are many Enterprise Architecture frameworks. The main purpose of most of these frameworks is to assist with the challenges of managing the increased complexity of distributed systems, aligning business vision with IT strategy and reducing IT costs. Many of the studies which produced the results stating Enterprise Architecture aligns business vision and reduces IT costs, were based on Zachman’s work, and most of the published Enterprise Architecture success stories focus on the benefits provided to the company with regards to IT. In contrast very little documentation could be found that addresses the impact of Enterprise Architecture implementations on the individuals and systems within a company. If the individuals as the main implementers of any strategy are impacted negatively by Enterprise Architecture management decisions, there would be a negative impact on the return on investment of the company. Enterprise Architecture allows the use of overlapping departments’ processes and data, which translates into less development time as system components would already exist. Changes that are made to the Enterprise Architecture result in several additional changes that had to be implemented by the software developers. These changes influenced the workload, roles and responsibilities of the developers in such a way that the development team became negative about the additional work. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of Enterprise Architecture management decisions on the responsibilities, work experience and attitude towards Enterprise Architecture of the software developers in a company that develops software by exploring and describing the nature of software development. Based on the findings of this study, a list of impact of Enterprise Architecture decisions on the responsibilities of software developers in companies that develop software were identified. In this respect, the study identified impacts of Enterprise Architecture management decisions as well as possible solutions to these impacts. / Computing / M. Sc. (Information Systems)