Spelling suggestions: "subject:"soil conservation."" "subject:"oil conservation.""
11 |
Awareness of soil erosion in eastern KansasJohnson, John L., 1943- January 2010 (has links)
Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
12 |
Selective weed and ground cover management in a coffee plantation with shade trees in Nicaragua /Aguilar, Victor. January 2001 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2001. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
13 |
Implementation costs of Kentucky's erosion control best management practices for skid trailsShouse, Bennett Scott. January 2002 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kentucky, 2001. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains vi, 75p : ill., maps. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 74).
|
14 |
Use of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (Rusle) to predict event soil loss /Kelsey, Kurt L. January 2002 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Stevens Point, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 37-39).
|
15 |
The design and evaluation of soil conservation systems in St. Lucia /Norville, Peter January 1989 (has links)
Three soil conservation systems: contour drainage, strip cropping, and terracing, were designed and established within separate plots on hillside farmlands in St. Lucia. A control plot with no form of soil conservation was also established. Topographic and soils surveys of these plots were conducted. Rainfall, runoff and soil loss were measured over one wet season. Crop yields and construction and maintenance costs were also determined. / For rainfall amounts between 14.2 and 211.2 mm, runoff depths varied from 0.6 to 203.6 mm in the control plot, 2.1 to 199.2 mm in the contour drained plot, 3.2 to 155.1 mm in the strip cropped plot and 1.3 to 94.7 mm in the terraced plot. The largest amounts of runoff were most often recorded in the strip cropped plot, while on most occasions, the terraced plot produced the least runoff. / Soil loss rates varied from 0.01 to 1.77 kg/ha in the control plot, 0.07 to 16.88 kg/ha in the contour drained plot, 0.2 to 28.86 kg/ha in the strip cropped plot and 0.01 to 6.62 kg/ha in the terraced plot. / Construction costs per hectare were EC$5565 for the contour drainage system, EC $5425 for the strip cropped system and EC$6350 for the terraced system. / Further monitoring of the conservation systems is required for prediction of their long-term effectiveness in runoff and soil erosion control.
|
16 |
Soil and water conservation programs in action the Vernon County Wisconsin experience /Goto, Junko. January 1981 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1981. / Typescript. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 167-176).
|
17 |
An evaluation of soil erosion in southern Brazil and a proposal for an integrated, national program of soil conservation and soil surveyBloomfield, Nathaniel J. T. January 1977 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--Wisconsin. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 74-78).
|
18 |
De regeling der agrarische defensieschadeKoppejan, Ary Willem Gijsbert, January 1943 (has links)
Proefschrift--Wageningen.
|
19 |
Quantifying amounts of nutrients from an agricultural watershedZitter, Yehuda Benjamin, January 1969 (has links)
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1969. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.
|
20 |
An economic analysis of the relationship between soil conservation behavior and farmland characteristicsSaliba, Bonnie. January 1983 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1983. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 137-146).
|
Page generated in 0.1684 seconds