Thesis (M.S.)--University of Kentucky, 2006. / Title from document title page (viewed on August 22, 2006). Document formatted into pages; contains: vi, 79 p. : ill. Includes abstract and vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-78).

At the heart of long term sustainable soil management is chemical fertility through the retention of exchangeable cations. Many current concepts of cation exchange and its relationship with base cation availability remain unchanged over the past century. Despite considerable advancements in analytical techniques many methods used today would be familiar to our forefathers. Comparative studies were undertaken in this thesis to understand how techniques to measure exchangeable soil ions could be enhanced and matched to defined scenarios. The total amount of cations that can be retained electrostatically on soil surfaces is termed the cation exchange capacity (CEC). An ability to systematically and consistently measure CEC is an essential step in soil characterisation. Compulsive exchange methods (using either 1.0 M NH4OAc or 0.05 M BaCl2) at a fixed pH value for determining CEC were scrutinised but acknowledged to be prone to systematic artefacts. The relationship between soil pH, soil texture and CEC was soil specific. When the batch method was compared with the column leach method, the former was more consistent for all soils. For calcareous soils BaCl2 was more suitable but NH4OAc was more generally applicable. The CEC was consistently significantly greater by the compulsive technique when compared with the effective method. The NH4OAc extraction method was applied to soils contaminated with potentially toxic elements (PTEs). The exchangeable concentration of PTEs correlated with total PTE loading. However, the exchangeable Ca decreased with amendment rate confirming an exchange of sites by PTEs. The compulsive technique extracted PTEs that were significantly 2 negatively correlated with soil basal respiration, phosphatase activity, potential nitrification rate (PNR) and the soil microbial biomass carbon. This confirms that of this method is evaluating the bioavailable/bioreactive fraction. Soil cation exchange capacity and exchangeable base cations increased commensurate with the amendment loading of bentonite and charcoal. The exchange capacity was also soil specific. Following amendments, the exchange capacity was higher after six weeks than after thirty weeks. This means that the amendment performance became impaired with time perhaps as the fine soil particles coated the ameliorant causing a decline in CEC. The difference between the effective and compulsive CEC was described as the calculated CEC. This was very sensitive to soil pH and was confirmed in a detailed study at a site where pH plots were amended over a five decade period. As pH rose, so did the exchangeable fraction of Ca, Mg and K. As the pH declined, Al, Fe and Mn exchangeability increased. Extraction techniques must be sympathetic of the soil pH value. The quantification and characterisation of exchangeable cations remains as fundamental a component of soil science today as it was a century ago.

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1957 F75 / Master of Science

This item was digitized as part of the Million Books Project led by Carnegie Mellon University and supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF). Cornell University coordinated the participation of land-grant and agricultural libraries in providing historical agricultural information for the digitization project; the University of Arizona Libraries, the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, and the Office of Arid Lands Studies collaborated in the selection and provision of material for the digitization project.

Field experiments have been conducted for the past 19 seasons at three Arizona locations on University of Arizona Agricultural Centers (Maricopa, MAC; Marana, MAR; and Safford, SAC. aimed at investigating nitrogen (N) fertilizer management in irrigated cotton (Gossypium spp.) production. The MAC and SAC experiments have been conducted each season since 1989 and the Marana site was initiated in 1994. The original purposes of the experiments were to test N fertilization strategies and to validate and refine N fertilization recommendations for Upland (G. hirsutum L.) and American Pima (G. barbadense L.) cotton. The experiments have each utilized N management tools such as pre-season soil tests for NO₃⁻-N, in-season plant tissue testing (petioles) for N fertility status, and crop monitoring to ascertain crop fruiting patterns and crop N needs. At each location, treatments ranged from a conservative to a more aggressive approach of N management. The integrity of the experimental sites at each location was maintained in each consecutive season. Results at each location revealed a strong relationship between the crop fruit retention levels and N needs for the crop. This pattern was further reflected in final yield analysis as a response to the N fertilization regimes used. The higher, more aggressive N application regimes did not consistently benefit yields at any location. Generally, the more conservative, feedback approach to N management provided optimum yields at all locations. In 2001, a transition project evaluating the residual N effects associated with each treatment regime was initiated and no fertilizer N was applied. From 2001 to 2005 the residual N studies were conducted at two of these locations (MAC and MAR). In 2006, the residual N study was conducted only at MAC (the University of Arizona ceased operations at MAR at the end of the 2005 season). Therefore, all N taken-up by the crop was assumed to be derived from residual soil N. However irrigation water analysis showed that NO₃⁻-N concentration levels added to the crop ranged from about 5 to 15 ppm. In 2001- 2005 there were no significant differences among the original fertilizer N regimes in terms of residual soil NO₃⁻-N concentrations, crop growth, development, lint yield, or fiber properties. In 2006 however, significant differences in lint yield among N fertilization regimes for the Maricopa location were found. This suggests a possible pattern associated with the residual fertilizer N effects in relation to the original treatments at the Maricopa site.

No description available.

No description available.

Soil organic matter (SOM) models simplify the complex turnover dynamics of organic matter in soils. Stabilization mechanisms are currently thought to play a dominant role in SOM turnover but they are not explicitly accounted for in most SOM models. One study addresses the implementation of an approach to account for the stabilization mechanism of physical protection in the SOC model RothC using 13C abundance measurements in conjunction with soil size fractionation data. SOM models are increasingly used to support policy decisions on carbon (C) mitigation and credibility of model predictions move into the focus of research. A site scale, Monte Carlo based model uncertainty analysis of a SOM model was carried out. One of the major results was that uncertainty and factor importance depend on the combination of external drivers. A different approach was used with the SOM ECOSSE model to estimate uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock changes of mineral and organic soils in Scotland. The average statistical model error from site scale evaluation was transferred to regional scale uncertainty to give an indication of the uncertainty in national scale predictions. National scale simulations were carried out subsequently to quantify SOC stock changes differentiating between organic and mineral soils and land use change types. Organic soils turned out to be most vulnerable to SOC losses in the last decades. The final study of this thesis emplyed the RothC model to simulate possible futures of global SOC stock changes under land use change and ten different climate scenarios. Land use change turned out to be of minor importance. The regionally balance between soil C inputs and decomposition leads to a diverse map of regional C gains and losses with different degrees of certainty.

Vita. / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

No description available.