• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Resilience to crusting of soils under conventional tillage and conservation agriculture

Tshigoli, Vhonani Lucadia 03 1900 (has links)
MSCAGR (Soil Science) / Department of Soil Science / Soil resilience is the ability of a soil to recover its function or capacity after applied stress such as crusting. Some soils have high potential for recovery while others have poor resilience. Soils with poor resilience are much more vulnerable to degradation. Many soils in South Africa are susceptible to crust formation, which affects many soil surface properties and processes and hence productivity. The objectives of this study were to demonstrate how soil resilience to crust formation is affected by conventional tillage and conservation agriculture in selected soils in South Africa. Soil samples were collected from four different soils (Hutton, Shortland, Glenrosa and Dundee) using PVC pipes with the length of 20 cm and diameter of 5cm and scanned using micro xray computed tomography for total pores. Total porosity from Luvisols, Ferrosols, Leptsols and Fluvisols under both conventional tillage and conservation agriculture was used to find soil resilience index. Soil crusting was influenced by both soil texture and clay mineralogy. The dominance of kaolinitic mineral caused the soil to be more stable as compared to soil dominated by quartz. Luvisols, Ferrosols and Leptsols were more stable and had aggregate stability of 57%, 69,5% and 32,7%, respectively. On the other hand, Fluvisols had poor aggregate stability with the value of 14,2%. Total porosity was in the order of 34,3%>32,2%>23,5%>16,3% for Ferrosols, Luvisols, Leptsols and Fluvisols, respectively. Soil crusting influenced the total porosity. Tillage practices had influence on soil crust formation hence, total porosity of the soils. Total porosity was higher under conservation agriculture as compare to conventional tillage. Resilience total porosity was in the order of 37,5> 23,9> 4,1> -30,1 on Luvisols, Ferrosols, Leptsols and Fluvisols, respectively. Soil resilience to crust formation was influenced by tillage practices. Soil resilience of Luvisols, Ferrosols and Leptsols can be achieved through conservation agriculture however, soil resilience of Fluvisols can be achieved through conventional tillage. / NRF

Page generated in 0.0571 seconds