No description available.

Time domain reflectometry (TDR) is becoming a widely used method to determine volumetric soil water content ($ theta$) and bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC$ sb{ rm a}$). It has been found that the $ theta$ and EC$ sb{ rm a}$ values obtained by this method, on certain soils, require calibration. The purpose of this study was to monitor the effects of soil texture (most particularly the clay type and clay content) on $ theta$ and EC$ sb{ rm a}$ estimated by TDR. / Water content was measured, gravimetrically and by TDR, on packed columns of nine soil mixtures, composed of three clay types (Hydrite, Bentonite, and Ste. Rosalie clay) and coarse sand at three levels (8, 16, and 30% by weight) of these clay materials. Three replicates of each mixture (a total of 27 columns) were made to statistically establish the effect of the clay type and the clay content on $ theta$ and EC$ sb{ rm a}$ readings by TDR. It was found that the TDR overestimated $ theta$ for the Hydrite and Ste. Rosalie (Natural) materials but accurately predicted for the Bentonite materials, compared to gravimetric determinations. / Bulk soil electrical conductivity was simultaneously measured by two independent techniques, TDR and 4-probe, on the same soils. It was found that the clay types and clay contents have almost equal effects on the EC$ sb{ rm a}$ as measured by TDR and 4-probe techniques. It was found that the estimated EC$ sb{ rm a}$ values obtained by TDR and 4-probe methods for the fine-textured Bentonite materials were lower than those for the Hydrite and Ste. Rosalie materials at equal $ theta$ and EC$ sb{ rm W}$ (electrical conductivity of soil water).

No description available.

published_or_final_version / Electrical Engineering / Master / Master of Science in Engineering