• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Hanseníase: comparação entre testes rápidos com antígeno PGL-I em amostras de sangue-total e soro / Leprosy: comparison between rapid tests with PGL-I antigen in samples of whole blood and serum

Grassi, Adriano Badotti 25 February 2008 (has links)
Submitted by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-10-05T14:30:57Z No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertaçao - Adriano Badotti Grassi - 2007.pdf: 1439206 bytes, checksum: 031af098879a0122f9c34462d0323a5f (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2016-10-05T14:31:18Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertaçao - Adriano Badotti Grassi - 2007.pdf: 1439206 bytes, checksum: 031af098879a0122f9c34462d0323a5f (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-10-05T14:31:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 Dissertaçao - Adriano Badotti Grassi - 2007.pdf: 1439206 bytes, checksum: 031af098879a0122f9c34462d0323a5f (MD5) license_rdf: 0 bytes, checksum: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-02-25 / Objectives: This study compared two leprosy rapid tests detecting (1) IgM against PGL-I (ML-Flow test, KIT, Amsterdam, Netherlands) or (2) IgM, IgG and IgA against PGL-I (ML-ICA, Yonsei University, South Korea). Methods: Whole blood and serum from untreated multibacillary (MB; n=50) and paucibacillary (PB; n=48) leprosy patients (Reference Center for Diagnosis and Treatment, Goiania, central Brazil), MB household contacts (HHC; n=35) and healthy endemic controls (EC; n=50) were tested. Leprosy patients were classified by dermato-neurological evaluation, bacillary index (BI) and histopathology. Median age was 29 years, 39.9% males. MB patients had BB-BL-LL leprosy (median BI=2.0), PB patients had TT-BT leprosy. Results: (1) Using sera, ML Flow positivity of MB patients was comparable to ML-ICA positivity. (2) For ML-Flow tests, the positivity was comparable with whole blood and serum. (3) Among PB leprosy ML- flow positiviy was comparable for whole blood and serum but it was higher than the ML-ICA seropositivity in whole blood and serum. (4) Among MB leprosy patients positivity of ML Flow test in serum and whole blood was comparable to the positivity of ML-ICA in serum. Conclusion: ML-Flow test is more field applicable than ML-ICA since high positivity was observed among MB patients using whole-bood. / Objetivos: Este estudo comparou dois testes rápidos para hanseníase que detectam (1) IgM anti-PGL-I (ML-Flow test, KIT, Amsterdam, Holoanda) ou (2) IgM, IgG e IgA anti-PGL-I (ML-ICA, Yonsei University, Coréia do Sul). Materiais e Métodos: Foram testados sangue-total e soro de pacientes com hanseníase multibacilar (MB; n=50) e paucibacilar (PB; n=48), virgens de tratamento (Centro de Referência em Diagnóstica e Terapêutica, Goiânia, GO), contactantes intradomiciliares de MB (CD; n=35) e indivíduos saudáveis de área endêmica (CS; n=50). Pacientes com hanseníase foram classificados segundo avaliação dermato-neurológica, índice baciloscópico (IB) e exame histopatológico. A mediana da idade foi de 29 anos, 39.9% do sexo masculino. Pacientes MB apresentavam as formas BB-BL-LL (mediana do IB=2.0), Pacientes PB apresentavam as formas TT-BT. Resultados: (1) Para o grupo MB não observamos diferença significante entre os resultados dos testes ML-Flow em amostras de sangue-total e soro e os resultados do ML-ICA em amostras de soro; (2) Em todos os grupos (MB, PB, CD e CS) que não observamos diferença estatisticamente significativa entres os resultados do ML-Flow em sangue-total ou soro; (3) Entre os pacientes PB o ML-Flow apresentou sensibilidade significativamente maior que o teste ML-ICA, em amostras de sangue-total e em soro; (4) O teste ML-ICA em soro discriminou melhor os pacientes MB e PB. Conclusão: O teste ML-Flow mostrou-se melhor para utilização em situações de campo que o ML-ICA, pois apresentou alta reatividade em sangue-total em pacientes MB.

Page generated in 0.0466 seconds