Spelling suggestions: "subject:"splicing factor"" "subject:"policing factor""
11 |
Involvement of the Polypyrimidine Tract-Binding Protein-Associated Splicing Factor (PSF) in the Hepatitis Delta Virus (HDV) RNA-Templated TranscriptionZhang, Da Jiang January 2014 (has links)
Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is the smallest known mammalian RNA virus, containing a genome of ~ 1700 nt. Replication of HDV is extremely dependent on the host transcription machinery. Previous studies indicated that RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) directly binds to and forms an active preinitiation complex on the right terminal stem-loop fragment (R199G) of HDV genomic RNA, and that the polypyrimidine tract-binding protein-associated splicing factor (PSF) directly binds to the same region. Further studies demonstrated that PSF also binds to the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) of RNAP II. In my thesis, co-immunoprecipitation assays were performed to show that PSF stimulates the interaction of RNAPII with R199G. Results of co-immunoprecipitation experiments also suggest that both the RNA recognition motif 2 (RRM2) and N-terminal proline-rich region (PRR) of PSF are required for the interaction between PSF and RNAPII, while the two RNA recognition motifs (RRM1 and RRM2) might be required for the interaction of PSF with R199G. Furthermore, in vitro run-off transcription assays suggest that PSF facilitates the HDV RNA transcription from the R199G template. Together, the above experiments suggest that PSF might act as a transcription factor for the RNAPII transcription of HDV RNA by linking the CTD of RNAPII and the HDV RNA promoter. My experiments provide a better understanding of the mechanism of HDV RNA-dependent transcription by RNAP II.
|
12 |
Polyhistidine repeats and Dyrk 1a: from the localization on the functionSalichs Fradera, Eulàlia 15 December 2008 (has links)
PolyHistidine repeats and DYRK1A: from the localization to the functionEl principal objectiu d'aquesta tesi ha estat el d'esbrinar noves funcions de la proteína quinasa DYRK1A en el nucli cel.lular. Donat que el domini de repetició d'histidines de DYRK1A dirigeix la proteína al compartiment d'speckles nuclears, aquesta propietat ha estat utilitzada per adreçar aquesta pregunta. Els resultats obtinguts en aquesta tesi han permès proposar els homopolímers d'histidina com una nova i general senyal de localització a speckles nuclears. Proteïnes amb segments de polihistidines, la majoria d'elles factors de transcripció, mostren un comportament intranuclear dinàmic, compatible amb un model en el quèl diferents dominis d'interacció competeixen entre ells pel reclutament de la proteína a diferents subcompartiments nuclears. El mecanisme molecular que media l'acumulació a speckles de les proteïnes amb polihistines s'ha estudiat utilitzant DYRK1A com a model. Els resultats obtinguts exclouen la unió a l'RNA com a mecanisme de reclutament i concloure que, aquest, ocorre mitjançant la interacció amb proteïnes residents. S'han identificat dues noves proteïnes interactores per a DYRK1A, l'RNA polimerasa II i el factor de transcripció Brn-3b. La fosforilació de DYRK1A sobre el domini C-terminal o CTD de l'RNA polimerasa II suggereix una funció directa de la quinasa en el procés de transcripció o del seu acoblament al processament d'RNAs missatgers. La fosforilació de DYRK1A sobre el domini d'activació de Brn-3b sembla regular positivament l'activitat transcripcional d'aquest factor. Aquests resultats indiquen una funció activa de DYRK1A en la regulació de la transcripció gènica, tant directament sobre la maquinària transcripcional com indirectament, modulant l'activitat de factors de transcripció. PolyHistidine repeats and DYRK1A: from the localization to the functionThe main objective of this thesis work has been to identify new roles for the protein kinase DYRK1A in the cell nucleus. Given that a histidine repeat in DYRK1A targets the protein to the nuclear speckle compartment, this property has been used as a tool to approach the question. The results obtained in this thesis work have allowed proposing homopolymeric histidine runs as a novel and general nuclear speckle-directing signal. Proteins with polyHistidine segments, mostly transcription factors, present a dynamic intranuclear behaviour compatible with a model in which distinct interacting domains compete for recruiting elements within the nucleus. The molecular mechanisms that mediate speckle accumulation have been studied in DYRK1A as a model system. The results allow excluding RNA binding as the recruiting mechanism and concluding that targeting is mediated by interaction with speckle-resident proteins. Two novel DYRK1A interactors have been identified during the study, the RNA polymerase II and the transcription factor Brn-3b. DYRK1A phosphorylation of the C-terminal domain or CTD of the RNA polymerase II suggests a direct role of DYRK1A on transcription or coupling of transcription with RNA processing. DYRK1A phosphorylation of Brn-3b within its activation domain seems to positively regulate Brn-3b transcriptional activity. These results confirm an active role for DYRK1A in gene transcription regulation both direct on the transcriptional machinery and indirect by modulating the activity of transcription factors.
|
13 |
Characterization of the Cis and Trans Acting Factors that Influence p53 IRES FunctionArandkar, Sharath Chandra January 2012 (has links) (PDF)
p53 is a nodal tumor suppressor protein that acts as a major defense against cancers. Approximately 50% of human tumours have mutations in p53 gene. Among its myriad features, the most distinctive is the ability to elicit both apoptotic death and cell cycle arrest. p53 has several isoforms. Most of them are produced by either internal promoter activity of the gene or alternate splicing of the pre-mRNA. Apart from these mechanisms, p53 mRNA has also been shown to be translated into two isoforms, the full-length p53 (FL-p53) and a truncated isoform ΔN-p53, which acts as a dominant-negative inhibitor of FL-p53.
Under conditions of cellular stress, the canonical mode of translation initiation is compromised. To maintain the synthesis of proteins important for cell survival and cell-fate decisions, a subset of cellular mRNAs utilizes a non-canonical mode of translation initiation. The 5’ untranslated region of these mRNAs are highly structured and function as Internal Ribosome Entry Site (IRES). Previously, from our laboratory it has been shown that translation of p53 and its N-terminally truncated isoform ΔN-p53 can be initiated by IRES mediated mechanism. IRES mediated translation of ΔNp53 was maximum at G1-S phase but that of FL-p53 was maximum at the G2-M phase. Interestingly in case of a human genetic disorder X-linked dyskeratosis congenita (X-DC), aberrant IRES mediated p53 translation has been reported. It has also been reported that during oncogenic induced senescence (OIS) a switch between cap-dependent to IRES meditated translation occurs in p53 mRNA. From our laboratory, we have also demonstrated that polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) positively regulates the IRES activities of both the p53 isoforms by shuttling from nucleus to the cytoplasm during genotoxic stress conditions. It is very important to understand how these two isoforms are regulated and in turn control the cellular functions.
In the first part of the thesis, to investigate the importance of the structural integrity of the cis acting elements within p53 RNA, we have compared the secondary structure of the wild-type RNA with cancer-derived silent mutant p53 RNAs having mutations in the IRES elements such as L22L (CTA to CTG) a natural cancer mutation and Triple Silent Mutation (mutations were present at the wobble position of codon 17, 18, 19). These mutations result in the conformational alterations of p53 IRES RNA that abrogates the IRES function ex vivo significantly. It appears that these mutant RNAs failed to bind some trans-acting factors (p37, p41/44 etc) which might be critical for the IRES function. By super-shift assay using anti hnRNPC1/C2 antibody, we have demonstrated that the TSM mutant showed reduced binding to this protein factor. Partial knockdown of hnRNP C1/C2 showed significant decrease in p53 IRES activity and reduced synthesis of ΔN-p53. Also we have showed that introducing compensatory mutations in TSM mutant RNA rescued the secondary structure as well as function of p53 IRES. Further, the role of another silent point mutation in the coding sequence of p53 was investigated. Silent mutation (CCG to CCA) at codon 36 (P36P) showed decreased IRES activity. The mutation also resulted in differential binding of cellular proteins. Taken together, our observations suggest pivotal role of some specific trans acting factors in regulating the p53-IRES function, which in turn influences the synthesis of different p53 isoforms.
In the second part of the thesis, p53 IRES RNA interacting proteins were identified using RNA affinity approach. Annexin A2 and PTB associated Splicing Factor (PSF/SFPQ) were identified and their interaction with p53 IRES RNA in vitro and ex vivo was studied. Interestingly, in the presence of Ca2+ ions Annexin A2 showed increased binding with p53 IRES. By competition UV crosslinking we have showed Annexin A2 and PSF interact specifically with p53 IRES. Toe printing assay results showed the putative contact points of Annexin A2 and PSF proteins on p53 IRES RNA. Interestingly, both proteins showed extensive toe-prints in the neighbourhood of the initiator AUG region of p53. Further, competition UV-crosslinking reveals the interplay of these two proteins. Annexin A2 and PSF appear to compete each other for binding with p53 IRES. PSF is known to interact with PTB protein. Since PTB also interacts with p53 IRES and positively regulates the translation, we wanted to study the interplay between PTB and PSF proteins binding with p53 IRES. To address this, we have performed competition UV crosslinking experiment and showed that increasing concentrations of PTB decreases PSF and p53 IRES interaction. However, increasing concentrations of PSF does not decrease or increase in PTB p53 IRES interaction. Results suggest that both Annexin A2 and PSF proteins play important role in regulation of p53 IRES activity.
To address the physiological role of Annexin A2 and PSF proteins on p53 IRES activity, these proteins were partially knocked down in cellulo. This in turn showed decrease in p53 IRES activity in dual luciferase assays as well as in the steady state levels of both the p53 isoforms in transient transfection experiments. Heightened or continued expression of p53 protein is very important under stress where IRES-dependent translation supersedes normal cap-dependent translation. Results showed that expression of Annexin A2 under doxorubicin and thapsigargin induced stress are important for maintenance of both p53 IRES activity and steady state levels of p53 isoforms. Earlier from our laboratory we have showed that the IRES responsible for ∆N-p53 translation is active at G1/S phase while the IRES responsible for full length p53 translation is active at G2/M phase. Subcellular localization of the trans-acting factors plays a pivotal role in regulation of IRES activity of cellular mRNA. In this context we wanted to study the nuclear and cytoplasm localization of Annexin A2 under different cell cycle stages. We have seen Annexin A2 protein is dispersed in nucleus and cytoplasm at G1/S boundary, but post-G2 phase it moved from nucleus to cytoplasm. Further we wanted to investigate the effect of Annexin A2 and PSF on expression of p53 transactivated genes. Partial knock down of Annexin A2 and PSF proteins showed decrease in p21 luciferase activity. By real-time PCR analysis, we have also showed decrease in expression of different p53 targets upon silencing of Annexin A2 protein.
Taken together, our observations suggest pivotal role of cis acting and trans-acting factors in regulating the p53-IRES function, which in turn influences the synthesis of p53 isoforms.
|
14 |
Studies on Interactions between ARE Binding Proteins and Splicing Factors and their Role in Altered Splicing of PDGF-B ORFChorghade, Sandip Gulab January 2012 (has links) (PDF)
Pre-mRNA splicing is an important level in posttranscriptional gene regulation that is essential for accurate protein synthesis and generating protein diversity. The abundance of cryptic splice sites and long intronic DNA sequences makes their splicing a complex one. The identification of correct exons and introns needs additional information in the form of splicing regulatory elements (SREs) along with canonical splice signals. The interplay among these SREs and the trans factors (which bind to SREs) gives the identity to introns and exons which in turn leads to precise pre-mRNA splicing.
Previous studies from our laboratory showed, that when expressed in mammalian cells from an expression vector, PDGF-B ORF was re-spliced at 4/5 exon junction with the downstream SV40 splice acceptor site in the vector. However, deletion of the 66-nt PDGF-B 3’ UTR region resulted in about 25% reduction in re-splicing. Sequence analysis of this region revealed presence of binding sites for splicing factors ASF/SF2 and SRp55, and an AU-rich element (ARE), mutation each of which affected re-splicing partially. In mammals, AREs are commonly found in the 3’UTR of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in diverse functions and are involved in selective mRNA degradation. Several ARE binding proteins are crucial for ARE’s function. Since mutation of the single ARE in the 3’UTR region altered the re-splicing efficiency, the role of AU-rich elements and ARE-binding proteins (AU-BPs) in modulation of splicing was investigated using siRNAs against AU-BPs, BRF1, hnRNPD, HuR, GAPDH and TTP. Down regulation of expression of these factors indeed affected the level of re-spliced product.
We have studied the interactions between the full-length splicing factors (U1-70K and U2AF35) and the AU-BPs (BRF1, hnRNPD and HuR) as well as among the AU-BPs using three different assay methods: Yeast-two hybrid, co-immunoprecipitation and pull down assays. Our study has revealed that the BRF1 interacts with U1-70K and U2AF35 as well as the other AU-BPs hnRNPD and HuR but with different affinities. We have also analyzed the ability of AU-BPs to interact with SR proteins SRp20 and 9G8. We did find strong interaction of BRF1 with SRp20 and 9G8.
Generation of a large number of nested deletion mutants of all the proteins allowed us to identify the interaction regions on the surface of BRF1, U1-70K, hnRNPD, U2AF35 and HuR. The results of Y2H analyses were further confirmed by pull down assay using purified interacting regions.
It was found that a single region from aa 181-254 in BRF1 interacts with multiple partners i.e., splicing factors and the AU-BP hnRNPD. However, the RNA-binding zinc-finger domain from residue 120-181 independently interacts with HuR. Further, the multiple protein interacting region (MPIR) (aa 181-254) in BRF1 exhibits different affinities towards its interacting partners with that for U1-70K and hnRNPD being stronger than that for U2AF35 and HuR. This observation suggests that BRF1 activity can be modulated by interaction with different partners at different sites.
U1-70K interacted only with BRF1 among the proteins tested in this study and this interaction appears to be RNA independent .This could have implications in splice site selection and RNA stability since BRF1 has been shown to promote RNA degradation. While the Arg/Glu-rich C-terminal region in U1-70K is sufficient for its interaction with BRF1, U2AF35 requires both the zinc-finger 2 and the arg/Gly/Ser-rich C-terminal regions for its association with BRF1.
hnRNPD also interacts with multiple partners that include BRF1, HuR and U2AF35 using the N-terminal region that harbors a Ala-rich domain. The interaction of hnRNPD with HuR is RNA dependent while with BRF1 and U2AF35, it is RNA independentt. Further, its interaction with all the partners is equally strong. This suggests that hnRNPD could exert differential influence depending on the context of its interaction and abundance of the interacting partner.
HuR, primarily known as an mRNA stabilizing factor, interacts with both BRF1 and hnRNPD with equal affinity involving the hinge region, the interaction with the former being RNA-independent and the later being RNA-dependent. This differential RNA-dependent and independent interactions with the two AU-BPs using a single interacting domain suggests a balancing act of HuR on the activities of BRF1 and hnRNPD. These interactions can further be differentially modulated by posttranslational modifications on one or all of the interacting partners depending on the physiological status of the cell.
We have also analyzed the multiple protein complexes formed in absence of cellular RNA. Though we are unable to see direct protein-protein interaction between HuR and U1-70K in Yeast two hybrid analysis, we could detect the presence of U1-70K in HuR immunoprecipitate. It appears that U1-70K associates with HuR via BRF. We also detected the presence of HuR in U1-70K complexes which could be due to its association with BRF1. We are unable to find hnRNPD and U2AF35 in these complexes indicating that they may have been excluded. In anti-U2AF35 immunoprecipitates, we detected the presence of U1-70K as well as hnRNPD but no HuR. This may be due to RNase treatment as hnRNPD and HuR interactions are RNA dependent.
Our findings that AU-rich elements in conjunction with AU-BPs function as intronic splicing modulators or enhancers, reveal hitherto unidentified new players in the poorly understood complex mechanisms that mediate alternative splicing. The possibility of dynamic nature of the interactions among splicing factors and AU-BPs mediated by post-translational modifications provide a basis for rapid cellular responses to changing environmental cues through generation of differentially spliced mRNAs and corresponding protein products that differ in their stability and hence their relative abundance. Our results also unfold enormous possibilities for future investigations on interactions among the many splicing factors and AU-BPs, and in understanding these complex interactions in modulation of pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA translation and degradation. The finding of coupling of AU-BPs to splicing machinery could further lead to better understanding of the mechanism of AU-BP-mediated targeting of mRNAs to processing bodies and ultimate degradation of the mRNAs.
|
Page generated in 0.074 seconds