Orientador: Alexandre Soares Carneiro / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-23T00:00:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Maerki_Thiago_M.pdf: 1616067 bytes, checksum: bbf1766d5d4d8f0c4d65216a0767d576 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013 / Resumo: A Legenda Maior, escrita por São Boaventura no século XIII, ocupa um lugar central dentre as hagiografias medievais que narram à vida de São Francisco de Assis e foi por muito tempo considerado a biografia oficial do fundador, responsável, pois, pela visão do santo mantida até o século XIX, quando estudos inovadores foram iniciados por Paul Sabatier. Apesar disso, são poucos os trabalhos que se dedicam à análise literária do texto hagiográfico boaventuriano, mais explorado pela História e pela Filosofia, ciências que não deixaram de apresentar recortes importantes sobre a obra. A primeira nos dá suporte para entender o conturbado momento interno da Ordem dos Frades Menores, o qual influenciou decisivamente a construção da narrativa; a segunda nos ajuda a compreender o pensamento místico do autor, influenciado, sobretudo, por Santo Agostinho e a pensar as Vidas de santos enquanto adoção de um "modo de vida" moldado pela ascese. Nesse sentido, procuramos analisar a personagem santoral à luz do pensamento de Pierre Hadot, principalmente no que diz respeito à associação entre "vida filosófica" e "vida cristã". Através de uma leitura interdisciplinar, desvendamos uma maneira específica de organização da narrativa, em que a construção da vida de Francisco é espelhada na teoria mística de Boaventura, narrando o itinerário da personagem em sete degraus de ascensão, partindo das criaturas até chegar à união com o criador, quando ocorre a estigmatização do santo. Para finalizar, analisamos os conceitos de figura, sermo humilis e gloria passionis, largamente explorados por Erich Auerbach, como recursos retórico-literários importantes para a economia da narrativa e para a construção da personagem Francisco / Abstract: Legenda Maior, written by St. Bonaventure in the thirteenth century, occupies a central place among the medieval hagiographies that tell the life of St. Francis of Assisi and was considered for a long time the official biography of the founder, responsible, therefore, for the saint's image kept until the nineteenth century, when innovative studies were started by Paul Sabatier. However, not many papers focus on the literary analysis of Bonaventure's hagiographic text, more explored by History and Philosophy, sciences that presented important views on this book. The former helps us understand the troubled internal situation of the Order of Friars Minor, which strongly influenced the construction of the narrative; the latter lets us know the author's mystical thought, especially influenced by St. Augustine, and consider the saints' Lives as the choice of a "way of life" shaped by asceticism. In this sense, we sought to analyze the holy personage from the perspective of Pierre Hadot's thought, especially with regard to the association between "philosophical life" and "Christian life." With an interdisciplinary approach, we reveal a specific way to organize the narrative in which the construction of Francis' life follows Bonaventure's mystical theory, narrating the character's journey in seven levels of ascension, starting from creatures to eventually attain union with the creator, when the saint's stigmatization occurs. Finally, we analyze the concepts of figura, sermo humilis and gloria passionis, widely examined by Erich Auerbach as important rhetorical and literary devices for narrative economy and for the construction of the figure of Francis / Mestrado / Teoria e Critica Literaria / Mestre em Teoria e História Literária

The justification of property ownership based on individual subjective rights is tightly bound to humanist moral perspectives. God is left out as irrelevant to the just grounds of ownership, which is established primarily on the basis of human self-referential, moral capacity. This thesis aims at developing an alternative justification, both for property as an institution and as a private holding, with a view to bringing God back into the centre stage and thereby placing property ownership on the objective concept of right. A tradition hitherto generally left unnoticed, yet uncovered here as the source of inspiration, vests the whole project with a moral-teleological tone. The tradition, enunciated by St. Augustine and developed by St. Bonaventure and John Wyclif, invites us to see property from the perspective of a moral end: it ought to be used for the love of God and neighbours, and as such it can be owned only by the just. In spite of important insights into the moral nature of property, the Augustinian thesis not only fails to spell out what ‘use for love’ means but also suffers from elitism. Nor does it offer an adequate justification of private property. Such weaknesses call for revision. When we reinterpret the Augustinian thesis through the concept of the divine imperative of service coupled with a proper understanding of human work, property acquires a distinctive justification. Property, as an institution, is justified as a requisite for carrying out God’s redemptive work towards the world. From this general justification ensues the particular justification. We hold property as specifically ‘mine,’ since each person’s ordained mission to participate in God’s work requires a uniquely personal material means, although the recognition and fulfilment of individual mission still demands communal efforts. The duty to carry out the God-commanded mission at first allows us to possess private property only in a non-proprietorial and non-exclusive manner. Yet in the prevailing condition of economic scarcity and human greed, civil jurisdiction must provide a structure of rights to enforce property institution. As God’s invitation for the transformation of the world is a universal command, everybody should have a minimum of property, and yet in differentiation of the scope and kinds commensurate with the particularities of individual mission.