No description available.

The roam objectives of this PhD project were to relate anal~ te solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide via molecular structure and also to investigate the factors that influence the solubility and extraction of analytes in a supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) when using carbon dioxide as the solvent. The polarity of an analyte was selected as the key parameter to developing a means of estimating steroid solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide. Polarity can be estimated by the hydrophobicity term, log P (based on partition coefficients), and also of the solubility parameter, 0,. The use of partition coefficient in conjunction with a calculated solubility parameter was demonstrated as a reasonable means of estimating steroid solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide. Experimental determination of the solubility of several steroid compounds with a range in polarities in supercritical carbon dioxide was carried out in order to correlate solute polarity to the solute solubility. A chromatographic method was also investigated based on capacity factor measurements for the prediction of steroid solubility in supercritical carbon dioxide. The application of supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) \\<ith carbon dioxide and modified carbon dioxide for the extraction of four antifungals from an animal feed matrix has been investigated. The SFE experiments were designed to optimize e:\.1:raction conditions for the extraction of the antifungals from the animal feed to allow for the evaluation of the most significant variables influencing extraction. A method was also developed for the analysis of the SFE animal feed extracts by packed-column supercritical fluid chromatography. The modification of the mobile phase with polar modifier was necessary to elute the antifungals. The procedure provided an alternative separation selectivity to the existing reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography techniques with much shorter analysis time.

No description available.

x, 101 leaves : ill., tables, graphs ; 30 cm. / Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library. / Thesis (Ph.D.1981) from the Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide

Thesis (Ph.D. 1981) from the Department of Obsetetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide.

E6-associated protein (E6-AP), which was originally identified as an ubiquitin-protein ligase, also functions as a co-activator that enhances the hormone-dependent transactivation of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors. To investigate the in vivo role of E6-AP in mammary gland development, we generated transgenic mouse lines that specifically overexpress either wild-type human E6-AP (E6-APWT) or the ubiquitin-protein ligase defective mutant E6-AP (E6-APC833S) in the mammary gland. Here we show that overexpression of E6-APWT results in impaired mammary gland development. In contrast, overexpression of E6-APC833S or loss of E6-AP (E6-APKO) increases lateral branching and alveolus-like protuberances in the mammary gland. We also show that the mammary phenotypes observed in the E6-AP transgenic and knockout mice are in large part due to the alteration of PR-B protein levels. RNAi-mediated knockdown of E6-AP in T47D breast cancer cells increased PR-B protein levels and stability. In vitro ubiquitination assay using purified E6-AP and PR-B reinforce these conclusions and demonstrate that E6-AP promotes PR-B turnover in an ubiquitin-dependent manner. Furthermore, we also show that E6-AP regulates progesterone-induced Wnt-4 expression by modulating the steady state level of PR-B in both mice and in human breast cancer cells. This novel mechanism appears to regulate normal physiology of the mammary gland and its dysregulation may prove to contribute importantly to mammary cancer development and progression. To test this hypothesis, we examined the E6-AP transgenic mice for tumor formation over a period of 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months. Our data shows that, unlike the E6-APWT mice that show normal phenotype, the E6-APC833S mice develop mammary hyperplasia at high penetrance (80%); with a median latency of 18 months. Our findings indicate that the inactivation of the E3-ligase function of E6-AP is sufficient to initiate the process of mammary tumor development. These findings strongly suggest that E6-AP may act as a tumor suppressor by down regulating the ER-alpha, PR-B and thereby their signaling pathways.

Corticosteroid ligands activate the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR plays a role in glucose homeostasis, adipogenesis, inflammation, and mood and cognitive functions. Understanding the interplay of diverse forms of receptor regulation (including post-translational modification, cofactor interactions, ligand binding, and receptor localization) and their effects is important for understanding and developing more effective treatment for a variety of conditions. Prior to ligand binding, the naïve GR is primarily cytoplasmic, residing in a chaperone complex containing heat-shock proteins and immunophilins. Upon ligand-binding, alterations to the complex allow the receptor to dimerize and import into the nucleus. Nuclear GR interacts with transcriptional regulatory sequences and recruits cofactors to regulate specific gene expression. Upon hormone withdrawal, the original chaperone complex is reassembled and the receptor is exported to the cytoplasm. Interestingly, while the import of GR into the nucleus occurs very rapidly (t ½ = 5 min), the re-export is significantly slower (t ½ = 12-24h). Previous work by our lab and others has indicated the existence of a nuclear retention signal (NRS) within the GR. The NRS sequence of the GR, its interaction partners, and the role it might play in the activity of the receptor have not yet been fully defined. Work in the Hache lab indicates that mutation of the GR nuclear localization signal 1 (NL1) increases the export rate of nuclear GR to the cytoplasm, as well as compromising receptor import, suggesting that the NL1 overlapped an NRS sequence. In this work, I made a series of GR mutants, based on sequence from the SV40 large T antigen NLS, which lacks nuclear retention activity. Using these mutants, I found that GR nuclear retention is influenced by both specific residues within the hinge region and the location of the sequence within the receptor, as reintroduction of the NLS sequence at the N-terminus of the receptor retention mutant failed to reconstitute the retention activity. Agonist liganded and hormone-withdrawn receptor mutants showed a similar decrease in retention. By contrast, antagonist-withdrawn GR mutants were retained in the nucleus, possibly due to altered receptor configuration and interactions. Assays of GR-responsive promoter activation by receptor retention mutants showed that while no difference in the ability of retention mutants to activate transcription was seen at a simple promoter, activation of a complex promoter was compromised. This impaired transactivation for the SV506-523 mutant correlated with decreased histone H4 acetylation and PolII recruitment, while GR DNA-binding at the target promoter appeared to be unaffected. These results suggested that promoter-specific cofactor interactions might be implicated in GR nuclear retention. Loss of GR hinge interaction with Oct cofactors produced an incomplete loss of retention, suggesting overlapping signals, but not supporting Oct as a primary factor in GR retention. The overlap between important residues in GR nuclear retention and localization signals and the lack of retention shown by the SV40 NLS suggested that retention might be intrinsic to the sequence of particular NLS. Preliminary results suggest that the KT511-512 residues of GR may be of general importance in protein nuclear retention, while the role of proline is likely more variable. My research has focused on increasing our understanding of glucocorticoid receptor nuclear retention and its possible implications. I have determined that the KT511-512 residues of GR play an important role in its retention, and possibly also figure in nuclear retention of other proteins. These residues are involved in interactions which affect promoter-specific histone acetylation and transcriptional activation in GR, suggesting a reason for the existence of nuclear retention.

Corticosteroid ligands activate the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR plays a role in glucose homeostasis, adipogenesis, inflammation, and mood and cognitive functions. Understanding the interplay of diverse forms of receptor regulation (including post-translational modification, cofactor interactions, ligand binding, and receptor localization) and their effects is important for understanding and developing more effective treatment for a variety of conditions. Prior to ligand binding, the naïve GR is primarily cytoplasmic, residing in a chaperone complex containing heat-shock proteins and immunophilins. Upon ligand-binding, alterations to the complex allow the receptor to dimerize and import into the nucleus. Nuclear GR interacts with transcriptional regulatory sequences and recruits cofactors to regulate specific gene expression. Upon hormone withdrawal, the original chaperone complex is reassembled and the receptor is exported to the cytoplasm. Interestingly, while the import of GR into the nucleus occurs very rapidly (t ½ = 5 min), the re-export is significantly slower (t ½ = 12-24h). Previous work by our lab and others has indicated the existence of a nuclear retention signal (NRS) within the GR. The NRS sequence of the GR, its interaction partners, and the role it might play in the activity of the receptor have not yet been fully defined. Work in the Hache lab indicates that mutation of the GR nuclear localization signal 1 (NL1) increases the export rate of nuclear GR to the cytoplasm, as well as compromising receptor import, suggesting that the NL1 overlapped an NRS sequence. In this work, I made a series of GR mutants, based on sequence from the SV40 large T antigen NLS, which lacks nuclear retention activity. Using these mutants, I found that GR nuclear retention is influenced by both specific residues within the hinge region and the location of the sequence within the receptor, as reintroduction of the NLS sequence at the N-terminus of the receptor retention mutant failed to reconstitute the retention activity. Agonist liganded and hormone-withdrawn receptor mutants showed a similar decrease in retention. By contrast, antagonist-withdrawn GR mutants were retained in the nucleus, possibly due to altered receptor configuration and interactions. Assays of GR-responsive promoter activation by receptor retention mutants showed that while no difference in the ability of retention mutants to activate transcription was seen at a simple promoter, activation of a complex promoter was compromised. This impaired transactivation for the SV506-523 mutant correlated with decreased histone H4 acetylation and PolII recruitment, while GR DNA-binding at the target promoter appeared to be unaffected. These results suggested that promoter-specific cofactor interactions might be implicated in GR nuclear retention. Loss of GR hinge interaction with Oct cofactors produced an incomplete loss of retention, suggesting overlapping signals, but not supporting Oct as a primary factor in GR retention. The overlap between important residues in GR nuclear retention and localization signals and the lack of retention shown by the SV40 NLS suggested that retention might be intrinsic to the sequence of particular NLS. Preliminary results suggest that the KT511-512 residues of GR may be of general importance in protein nuclear retention, while the role of proline is likely more variable. My research has focused on increasing our understanding of glucocorticoid receptor nuclear retention and its possible implications. I have determined that the KT511-512 residues of GR play an important role in its retention, and possibly also figure in nuclear retention of other proteins. These residues are involved in interactions which affect promoter-specific histone acetylation and transcriptional activation in GR, suggesting a reason for the existence of nuclear retention.

Corticosteroid ligands activate the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). GR plays a role in glucose homeostasis, adipogenesis, inflammation, and mood and cognitive functions. Understanding the interplay of diverse forms of receptor regulation (including post-translational modification, cofactor interactions, ligand binding, and receptor localization) and their effects is important for understanding and developing more effective treatment for a variety of conditions. Prior to ligand binding, the naïve GR is primarily cytoplasmic, residing in a chaperone complex containing heat-shock proteins and immunophilins. Upon ligand-binding, alterations to the complex allow the receptor to dimerize and import into the nucleus. Nuclear GR interacts with transcriptional regulatory sequences and recruits cofactors to regulate specific gene expression. Upon hormone withdrawal, the original chaperone complex is reassembled and the receptor is exported to the cytoplasm. Interestingly, while the import of GR into the nucleus occurs very rapidly (t ½ = 5 min), the re-export is significantly slower (t ½ = 12-24h). Previous work by our lab and others has indicated the existence of a nuclear retention signal (NRS) within the GR. The NRS sequence of the GR, its interaction partners, and the role it might play in the activity of the receptor have not yet been fully defined. Work in the Hache lab indicates that mutation of the GR nuclear localization signal 1 (NL1) increases the export rate of nuclear GR to the cytoplasm, as well as compromising receptor import, suggesting that the NL1 overlapped an NRS sequence. In this work, I made a series of GR mutants, based on sequence from the SV40 large T antigen NLS, which lacks nuclear retention activity. Using these mutants, I found that GR nuclear retention is influenced by both specific residues within the hinge region and the location of the sequence within the receptor, as reintroduction of the NLS sequence at the N-terminus of the receptor retention mutant failed to reconstitute the retention activity. Agonist liganded and hormone-withdrawn receptor mutants showed a similar decrease in retention. By contrast, antagonist-withdrawn GR mutants were retained in the nucleus, possibly due to altered receptor configuration and interactions. Assays of GR-responsive promoter activation by receptor retention mutants showed that while no difference in the ability of retention mutants to activate transcription was seen at a simple promoter, activation of a complex promoter was compromised. This impaired transactivation for the SV506-523 mutant correlated with decreased histone H4 acetylation and PolII recruitment, while GR DNA-binding at the target promoter appeared to be unaffected. These results suggested that promoter-specific cofactor interactions might be implicated in GR nuclear retention. Loss of GR hinge interaction with Oct cofactors produced an incomplete loss of retention, suggesting overlapping signals, but not supporting Oct as a primary factor in GR retention. The overlap between important residues in GR nuclear retention and localization signals and the lack of retention shown by the SV40 NLS suggested that retention might be intrinsic to the sequence of particular NLS. Preliminary results suggest that the KT511-512 residues of GR may be of general importance in protein nuclear retention, while the role of proline is likely more variable. My research has focused on increasing our understanding of glucocorticoid receptor nuclear retention and its possible implications. I have determined that the KT511-512 residues of GR play an important role in its retention, and possibly also figure in nuclear retention of other proteins. These residues are involved in interactions which affect promoter-specific histone acetylation and transcriptional activation in GR, suggesting a reason for the existence of nuclear retention.

Proefschrift--Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht. / Includes bibliographical references.