Spelling suggestions: "subject:"stochastic volatility."" "subject:"ctochastic volatility.""
11 |
Pricing variance swaps by using two methods : replication strategy and a stochastic volatility modelPetkovic, Danijela January 2008 (has links)
<p>In this paper we investigate pricing of variance swaps contracts. The</p><p>literature is mostly dedicated to the pricing using replication with</p><p>portfolio of vanilla options. In some papers the valuation with stochastic</p><p>volatility models is discussed as well. Stochastic volatility is becoming</p><p>more and more interesting to the investors. Therefore we decided to</p><p>perform valuation with the Heston stochastic volatility model, as well</p><p>as by using replication strategy.</p><p>The thesis was done at SunGard Front Arena, so for testing the replica-</p><p>tion strategy Front Arena software was used. For calibration and testing</p><p>of the Heston model we used MatLab.</p>
|
12 |
Pricing variance swaps by using two methods : replication strategy and a stochastic volatility modelPetkovic, Danijela January 2008 (has links)
In this paper we investigate pricing of variance swaps contracts. The literature is mostly dedicated to the pricing using replication with portfolio of vanilla options. In some papers the valuation with stochastic volatility models is discussed as well. Stochastic volatility is becoming more and more interesting to the investors. Therefore we decided to perform valuation with the Heston stochastic volatility model, as well as by using replication strategy. The thesis was done at SunGard Front Arena, so for testing the replica- tion strategy Front Arena software was used. For calibration and testing of the Heston model we used MatLab.
|
13 |
Option Pricing with Long Memory Stochastic Volatility ModelsTong, Zhigang 06 November 2012 (has links)
In this thesis, we propose two continuous time stochastic volatility models with long memory that generalize two existing models. More importantly, we provide analytical formulae that allow us to study option prices numerically, rather than by means of simulation. We are not aware about analytical results in continuous time long memory case. In both models, we allow for the non-zero correlation between the stochastic volatility and stock price processes. We numerically study the effects of long memory on the option prices. We show that the fractional integration parameter has the opposite effect to that of volatility of volatility parameter in short memory models. We also find that long memory models have the potential to accommodate the short term options and the decay of volatility skew better than the corresponding short memory stochastic volatility models.
|
14 |
Option Pricing under Stochastic Volatility for Levy Processes: An Empirical Analysis of TAIEX Index OptionsChen, Ju-Ying 17 July 2010 (has links)
none
|
15 |
Option Pricing with Long Memory Stochastic Volatility ModelsTong, Zhigang January 2012 (has links)
In this thesis, we propose two continuous time stochastic volatility models with long memory that generalize two existing models. More importantly, we provide analytical formulae that allow us to study option prices numerically, rather than by means of simulation. We are not aware about analytical results in continuous time long memory case. In both models, we allow for the non-zero correlation between the stochastic volatility and stock price processes. We numerically study the effects of long memory on the option prices. We show that the fractional integration parameter has the opposite effect to that of volatility of volatility parameter in short memory models. We also find that long memory models have the potential to accommodate the short term options and the decay of volatility skew better than the corresponding short memory stochastic volatility models.
|
16 |
Estimating Stochastic Volatility Using Particle FiltersChen, Huaizhi 03 August 2009 (has links)
No description available.
|
17 |
A New Class of Stochastic Volatility Models for Pricing Options Based on Observables as Volatility ProxiesZhou, Jie 12 1900 (has links)
One basic assumption of the celebrated Black-Scholes-Merton PDE model for pricing derivatives is that the volatility is a constant. However, the implied volatility plot based on real data is not constant, but curved exhibiting patterns of volatility skews or smiles. Since the volatility is not observable, various stochastic volatility models have been proposed to overcome the problem of non-constant volatility. Although these methods are fairly successful in modeling volatilities, they still rely on the implied volatility approach for model implementation. To avoid such circular reasoning, we propose a new class of stochastic volatility models based on directly observable volatility proxies and derive the corresponding option pricing formulas. In addition, we propose a new GARCH (1,1) model, and show that this discrete-time stochastic volatility process converges weakly to Heston's continuous-time stochastic volatility model. Some Monte Carlo simulations and real data analysis are also conducted to demonstrate the performance of our methods.
|
18 |
Stochastic Volatility Models and Simulated Maximum Likelihood EstimationChoi, Ji Eun 08 July 2011 (has links)
Financial time series studies indicate that the lognormal assumption for the return of an underlying security is often violated in practice. This is due to the presence of time-varying volatility in the return series. The most common departures are due to a fat left-tail of the return distribution, volatility clustering or persistence, and asymmetry of the volatility. To account for these characteristics of time-varying volatility, many volatility models have been proposed and studied in the financial time series literature. Two main conditional-variance model specifications are the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and the stochastic volatility (SV) models.
The SV model, proposed by Taylor (1986), is a useful alternative to the ARCH family (Engle (1982)). It incorporates time-dependency of the volatility through a latent process, which is an autoregressive model of order 1 (AR(1)), and successfully accounts for the stylized facts of the return series implied by the characteristics of time-varying volatility. In this thesis, we review both ARCH and SV models but focus on the SV model and its variations. We consider two modified SV models. One is an autoregressive process with stochastic volatility errors (AR--SV) and the other is the Markov regime switching stochastic volatility (MSSV) model. The AR--SV model consists of two AR processes. The conditional mean process is an AR(p) model , and the conditional variance process is an AR(1) model. One notable advantage of the AR--SV model is that it better captures volatility persistence by considering the AR structure in the conditional mean process. The MSSV model consists of the SV model and a discrete Markov process. In this model, the volatility can switch from a low level to a high level at random points in time, and this feature better captures the volatility movement. We study the moment properties and the likelihood functions associated with these models.
In spite of the simple structure of the SV models, it is not easy to estimate parameters by conventional estimation methods such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) or the Bayesian method because of the presence of the latent log-variance process. Of the various estimation methods proposed in the SV model literature, we consider the simulated maximum likelihood (SML) method with the efficient importance sampling (EIS) technique, one of the most efficient estimation methods for SV models. In particular, the EIS technique is applied in the SML to reduce the MC sampling error. It increases the accuracy of the estimates by determining an importance function with a conditional density function of the latent log variance at time t given the latent log variance and the return at time t-1.
Initially we perform an empirical study to compare the estimation of the SV model using the SML method with EIS and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with Gibbs sampling. We conclude that SML has a slight edge over MCMC. We then introduce the SML approach in the AR--SV models and study the performance of the estimation method through simulation studies and real-data analysis. In the analysis, we use the AIC and BIC criteria to determine the order of the AR process and perform model diagnostics for the goodness of fit. In addition, we introduce the MSSV models and extend the SML approach with EIS to estimate this new model. Simulation studies and empirical studies with several return series indicate that this model is reasonable when there is a possibility of volatility switching at random time points. Based on our analysis, the modified SV, AR--SV, and MSSV models capture the stylized facts of financial return series reasonably well, and the SML estimation method with the EIS technique works very well in the models and the cases considered.
|
19 |
Stochastic Volatility Models and Simulated Maximum Likelihood EstimationChoi, Ji Eun 08 July 2011 (has links)
Financial time series studies indicate that the lognormal assumption for the return of an underlying security is often violated in practice. This is due to the presence of time-varying volatility in the return series. The most common departures are due to a fat left-tail of the return distribution, volatility clustering or persistence, and asymmetry of the volatility. To account for these characteristics of time-varying volatility, many volatility models have been proposed and studied in the financial time series literature. Two main conditional-variance model specifications are the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) and the stochastic volatility (SV) models.
The SV model, proposed by Taylor (1986), is a useful alternative to the ARCH family (Engle (1982)). It incorporates time-dependency of the volatility through a latent process, which is an autoregressive model of order 1 (AR(1)), and successfully accounts for the stylized facts of the return series implied by the characteristics of time-varying volatility. In this thesis, we review both ARCH and SV models but focus on the SV model and its variations. We consider two modified SV models. One is an autoregressive process with stochastic volatility errors (AR--SV) and the other is the Markov regime switching stochastic volatility (MSSV) model. The AR--SV model consists of two AR processes. The conditional mean process is an AR(p) model , and the conditional variance process is an AR(1) model. One notable advantage of the AR--SV model is that it better captures volatility persistence by considering the AR structure in the conditional mean process. The MSSV model consists of the SV model and a discrete Markov process. In this model, the volatility can switch from a low level to a high level at random points in time, and this feature better captures the volatility movement. We study the moment properties and the likelihood functions associated with these models.
In spite of the simple structure of the SV models, it is not easy to estimate parameters by conventional estimation methods such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) or the Bayesian method because of the presence of the latent log-variance process. Of the various estimation methods proposed in the SV model literature, we consider the simulated maximum likelihood (SML) method with the efficient importance sampling (EIS) technique, one of the most efficient estimation methods for SV models. In particular, the EIS technique is applied in the SML to reduce the MC sampling error. It increases the accuracy of the estimates by determining an importance function with a conditional density function of the latent log variance at time t given the latent log variance and the return at time t-1.
Initially we perform an empirical study to compare the estimation of the SV model using the SML method with EIS and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method with Gibbs sampling. We conclude that SML has a slight edge over MCMC. We then introduce the SML approach in the AR--SV models and study the performance of the estimation method through simulation studies and real-data analysis. In the analysis, we use the AIC and BIC criteria to determine the order of the AR process and perform model diagnostics for the goodness of fit. In addition, we introduce the MSSV models and extend the SML approach with EIS to estimate this new model. Simulation studies and empirical studies with several return series indicate that this model is reasonable when there is a possibility of volatility switching at random time points. Based on our analysis, the modified SV, AR--SV, and MSSV models capture the stylized facts of financial return series reasonably well, and the SML estimation method with the EIS technique works very well in the models and the cases considered.
|
20 |
On Stochastic Volatility Models as an Alternative to GARCH Type ModelsNilsson, Oscar January 2016 (has links)
For the purpose of modelling and prediction of volatility, the family of Stochastic Volatility (SV) models is an alternative to the extensively used ARCH type models. SV models differ in their assumption that volatility itself follows a latent stochastic process. This reformulation of the volatility process makes however model estimation distinctly more complicated for the SV type models, which in this paper is conducted through Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. The aim of this paper is to assess the standard SV model and the SV model assuming t-distributed errors and compare the results with their corresponding GARCH(1,1) counterpart. The data examined cover daily closing prices of the Swedish stock index OMXS30 for the period 2010-01-05 to 2016- 03-02. The evaluation show that both SV models outperform the two GARCH(1,1) models, where the SV model with assumed t-distributed error distribution give the smallest forecast errors.
|
Page generated in 0.0618 seconds