published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work

published_or_final_version / abstract / toc / Education / Master / Master of Education

published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work

published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work

交叉傳遞被定義為人際間的一種壓力傳遞過程。本研究的目的在於考察中國雙職工夫妻的交叉傳遞效應。具體而言，我將探討個體的工作-家庭關係（工作-家庭衝突與工作-家庭豐富）如何影響其配偶的結果變量（心理壓力，生活滿意度，婚姻滿意度，與工作滿意度）。本研究包括兩部分，研究一為問卷調查，研究二為深度訪談。本研究致力於回答三個研究問題：（1）交叉傳遞效應獨立於個體內效應而存在嗎？對象互依性模型分析顯示，妻子的工作-家庭豐富顯著預測丈夫的四個結果變量，丈夫的工作-家庭衝突與工作-家庭豐富顯著預測妻子的婚姻滿意度，交叉傳遞效應確實獨立於個體內效應而存在。（2）交叉傳遞的可能機制是什麼？我進行了三組探索。在A部分，通過考察一有影響力的交叉傳遞模型，我檢視了負性與正性的交叉傳遞機制。對於負性傳遞機制，我發現共同壓力源直接影響夫妻雙方的工作-家庭衝突，妻子的工作-家庭衝突直接影響丈夫的幸福感，而妻子所知覺到的下降的關係品質在丈夫的工作-家庭衝突與妻子的幸福感之間起到了中介的作用。對於正性傳遞機制，我發現共同壓力源僅顯著預測妻子的工作-家庭豐富。個體所知覺到的改善的關係品質在其配偶的工作-家庭豐富與個體的幸福感之間起到了中介的作用。在B部分，我發現妻子的觀點採擇能夠緩解丈夫的工作-家庭衝突對妻子心理壓力的影響，以及強化丈夫的工作-家庭豐富對妻子婚姻滿意度的影響，但該效應需要進一步驗證。在C部分，我發現個體的工作-家庭角色融合這一特質在其配偶的工作-家庭衝突（豐富）與個體的工作-家庭衝突（豐富）之間起到了部分中介的作用。（3）交叉傳遞過程有無性別化的傳遞模式？結果顯示交叉傳遞過程是一種雙向過程：由丈夫傳遞至妻子，以及由妻子傳遞至丈夫。但在特定情況下，傳遞路徑的強度可能不盡相同。訪談內容的分析加深了我們對交叉傳遞現象的理解。 / Crossover is defined as the interpersonal process that occurs when job stress or strain experienced by one person affects the level of strain of another person in the same social environment. The purpose of the present study is to examine the crossover effects in a sample of Chinese dual-earner couples. Specifically, I examined how one partner’s work-family interface (work-family conflict/WFC and work-family enrichment/WFE) might affect the other partner’s outcomes (psychological strain, life satisfaction, marital satisfaction, and job satisfaction). Altogether, two studies were conducted. Study 1 was a questionnaire survey, and Study 2 was a qualitative interview. Overall, the present study aims at answering three research questions: (1) Do crossover effects exist independent of within-individual effects? The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) analysis showed that wives’ WFE emerged as a significant predictor of husbands’ four outcome variables in the expected direction. Husbands’ WFC and WFE were predictive of wives’ marital satisfaction. Results demonstrated that the crossover effects do exist independent of established within-individual effects. (2) What are the possible mechanisms of the crossover process? In this part, three sets of investigations were conducted. In Section A, I examined the mechanisms of both negative and positive crossover through testing an influential crossover model. For the mechanisms of negative crossover, I found that common stressors directly influenced both husbands’ and wives’ WFC. Wives’ WFC had a direct impact on husbands’ well-being, whereas the relationship between husbands’ WFC and wives’ well-being was mediated by wives’ perception of impaired relationship quality. For the mechanisms of positive crossover, I found that common stressors were a significant predictor of wives’ WFE, but not that of husbands’ WFE. Analysis highlights a strong indirect transfer from husbands’ WFE to wives’ well-being through wives’ perception of improved relationship quality, as well as from wives’ WFE to husbands’ well-being through husbands’ perception of improved relationship quality. In Section B, I further looked into the role of empathy in the direct crossover paths and found that wives’ perspective taking buffered the negative effect of husbands’ WFC on wives’ psychological strain, and strengthened the relationship between husbands’ WFE and wives’ marital satisfaction. To note, the interaction effects are not strong and may require further investigation. In Section C, I examined the role of personal attribute (i.e., work-family role integration) in the crossover process and found that wives’ work-family role integration partially mediated the relationship between husbands’ WFC and wives’ WFC, as well as between husbands’ WFE and wives’ WFE. Likewise, husbands’ work-family role integration partially mediated the relationship between wives’ WFC and husbands’ WFC, as well as between wives’ WFE and husbands’ WFE. (3) What are the gendered crossover patterns in Chinese dual-earner couples? Results from various research models suggested that the crossover process is a two-way phenomenon: from husbands to wives and vice versa. However, under specific circumstances, the two crossover paths might not be equally strong. Interview responses in Study 2 deepened our understanding of the crossover phenomenon. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Liu, Huimin. / Thesis (Ph.D.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2013. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 129-144). / Abstract also in Chinese; appendix A in Chinese. / Chapter Chapter One: --- Literature Review --- p.1 / Work-Family Interface (WFI) --- p.2 / Recent Perspective on Work-Family Interface --- p.9 / The Present Study --- p.26 / Chapter Chapter Two: --- Questionnaire Survey (Study 1) --- p.28 / Research Methods --- p.28 / Research Question One --- p.35 / Hypotheses --- p.35 / Results --- p.37 / Research Question Two --- p.42 / Chapter Section A: --- Mechanisms of Crossover --- p.43 / Hypotheses --- p.43 / Results --- p.53 / Discussion --- p.63 / Chapter Section B: --- A Closer Look at the Role of Empathy --- p.70 / Hypotheses --- p.70 / Results --- p.72 / Discussion --- p.77 / Chapter Section C: --- Further Examination of Personal Attribute (WFRI) --- p.79 / Hypotheses --- p.79 / Results --- p.86 / Discussion --- p.91 / Chapter Chapter Three: --- Qualitative Interview (Study 2) --- p.95 / Purposes --- p.95 / Participants and Procedure --- p.96 / Data Analysis --- p.97 / Results --- p.98 / Discussion --- p.112 / Chapter Chapter Four: --- General Discussion --- p.117 / A Summary of Research Findings --- p.117 / Limitations and Future Directions --- p.122 / Contributions and Implications --- p.126 / References --- p.129 / Appendices --- p.145 / Chapter Appendix A. --- The Chinese version of the scales used in Study 1. --- p.145 / Chapter Appendix B. --- The coding schemes of the qualitative interview --- p.151

published_or_final_version / Social Work and Social Administration / Doctoral / Doctor of Philosophy

published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work

published_or_final_version / Social Work / Master / Master of Social Work

by Ho Yuk Mei. / Thesis (M.S.W.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1995. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 107-113). / Acknowledgements / Abstract / Chapter Chapter I --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter Chapter II --- Family Caregiving of Elderly in Hong Kong --- p.5 / Chapter 1 --- Characteristics and Needs of Elderly Population in Hong Kong --- p.5 / Chapter 2 --- Social Services for the Elderly in Hong Kong --- p.8 / Chapter 3 --- Family Caregiving in Hong Kong --- p.11 / Chapter 4 --- Local Researches on Family Caregivers of Frail Elderly --- p.13 / Chapter Chapter III --- Literature Review on Family Caregivers of Frail Elderly --- p.18 / Chapter 1 --- Elderly --- p.18 / Chapter 2 --- Frail Elderly --- p.19 / Chapter 3 --- Family Caregivers of Frail Elderly --- p.22 / Chapter 4 --- Caregiving as a Stressful Experience --- p.25 / Chapter 5 --- Stress and Coping Model --- p.29 / Chapter Chapter IV --- Conceptual Framework of Stress and Coping Strategies of Family Caregivers of Frail Elderly --- p.40 / Chapter 1 --- Definitions of Major Variables --- p.40 / Chapter 2 --- Interrelationships of Major Variables (Hypotheses) --- p.43 / Chapter Chapter V --- Research Methodology --- p.46 / Chapter 1 --- Sampling --- p.46 / Chapter 2 --- Measuring Instruments --- p.48 / Chapter 3 --- Data Collection Procedure --- p.56 / Chapter 4 --- Data Analysis --- p.57 / Chapter Chapter VI --- Findings on the Characteristics of Family Caregivers and their Frail Elderly Relatives --- p.58 / Chapter 1 --- Characteristics of Family Caregivers --- p.58 / Chapter 2 --- Characteristics of the Frail Elderly --- p.67 / Chapter Chapter VII --- "Findings on Level and Areas of Family Caregiving, Stress, Appraisal, Coping Strategies and Life Satisfaction of Family Caregivers" --- p.78 / Chapter 1 --- Level and Areas of Family Caregiving of Frail Elderly --- p.78 / Chapter 2 --- Level of Stress of Family Caregivers --- p.81 / Chapter 3 --- Appraisal of Caregiving Situation by Family Caregivers --- p.82 / Chapter 4 --- Coping Strategies of Family Caregivers --- p.85 / Chapter 5 --- Level of Life Satisfaction of Family Caregivers --- p.89 / Chapter Chapter VIII --- Findings on Hypotheses Testing --- p.91 / Chapter Chapter IX --- Summary and Limitations --- p.95 / Chapter Chapter X --- Recommendations --- p.101 / Bibliography --- p.107 / Appendix 1 Eligibility Criteria of Day Care Centre for the Elderly --- p.114 / Appendix 2 Eligibility Criteria of Elderly Cases of Home Help Service --- p.115 / Appendix 3 Description of the Coping Scale --- p.116 / Appendix 4 Questionnaire (Chinese Version) --- p.117 / Appendix 5 Questionnaire (English Version) --- p.131 / Appendix 6 Percentage of Responses to the Items in the Ways of Coping Questionnaire --- p.147

published_or_final_version / Social Work and Social Administration / Master / Master of Social Sciences