The movements of Western Chorus Frogs (Pseudacris, triseriata triseriata) were studied from March, 1970, to March, 1971, at the Robert H. and Esther L. Cooper Woodland Area near Muncie, Delaware County, Indiana. The objectives of the study were to determine: (1) the time and rate of dispersal from the breeding pool; (2) the day-to-day movements, including the time and minimal distance traveled; (3) the preferred cover or microhabitat; and (4) the site of hibernation.Seventy-three Chorus Frogs were tagged with approximately 50 μc Co60 and toe-clipped, and each was released at its capture site. The frogs were then sought at intervals by surveying the area with a portable survey meter equipped with a scintillation probe. The location of each recovered specimen and a description of the recapture site was recorded.Sixty-two individual specimens were recaptured at least one time. The number of recaptures for each specimen was variable, and the maximum number of recaptures for a single specimen was 26 times. In all, 324 recoveries of tagged specimens were made. The tagged specimens graduallybecame lost to the investigator, and the last specimen was found on August 4. The longest period of contact for an individual frog was 134 days.Some Chorus Frogs began leaving the breeding pools soon after the first eggs were observed on April 1. The exodus appeared to be gradual as a few (one to eight) additional tagged specimens were found out of the pools throughout April and early May. Four of these specimens returned at least once to their original pool and seventeen frogs entered a second pool.From a single attempt to monitor the overnight activities of these frogs, it appears that they remain quiescent during the daylight hours and become active between dusk and dawn.The minimal distances traveled by the tagged, specimens during the study are more a function of the length of the contact period and the number of recaptures than of the activity of the frogs. The average rate of movement for all of the specimens over the entire study period was 11.3 feet/day. However, the fastest observed rate of movement for a single specimen between two recapture sites was 138 feet/day. The greatest straight distance any specimen was found from its original pool was 700 feet. Most recaptures were within 500 feet of the pools where the specimens were tagged.In 213 (91.3%) of the 234 recaptures made daylight hours after the frogs left the breeding pools,the frogs were hidden in the leaf litter of the woods or dead grasses of the grassland. In the remaining recaptures the frogs were hidden under small objects. The frogs seemed to prefer moist rather than dry or wet cover, but this is possibly more a reflection of conditions at the time of the study than a preference on the part of the frogs.The gradual disappearance of the tagged frogs from the study area, the woodland situation of the breeding pools, and the concentration of searching efforts in the vicinity of the pools prevented the determination of the preferred habitat type (woodland or grassland). Also, because of the loss of all tagged specimens by the end of summer, hibernating sites were not located.There is evidence that the gradual disappearance of tagged specimens may be explained by predation or movement of the frogs underground or out of the study area. Other frogs lost their cobalt wires and could no longer be located.

The relationship between habitat preferences and rates of dispersal and directional orientation across different vegetations was investigated using captures from an array of drift fences for Pseudacris triseriata , at a breeding pond near Boucherville, Quebec. Growth rates for juveniles were similar across the study area, suggesting that food was not limiting and movement is related to habitat preference. Frog residence time in habitat enclosures, and between fence arrays was significantly longer for frogs in humid prairie vegetation compared to those in shrubby vegetation. The number of frogs caught per metre of fence in humid prairies was also on average higher than either shrubby or arid prairie vegetations. Together both migration rates and captures per metre of fence suggest that the preferred habitat for P. triseriata is humid prairie vegetation (e.g. Phalaris grass). Target-oriented dispersal may explain why similar numbers of P. triseriata were captured in both shrubby and humid prairie vegetation, despite the perceived preference for humid prairies over shrubby vegetation. The continued persistence of this population appears to be based on the recruitment of juveniles from the larval stage, and is also sensitive to the fecundity of the first time breeders.

No description available.

The movements of Western Chorus Frogs, Pseudacris triseriata triseriata, were studied from May 1, 1975, to May 16, 1975, on the Robert H. and Esther L. Cooper Woodland Area near Muncie, Delaware County, Indiana. The purpose of the study was to obtain detailed information on the day-to-day and hour-to-hour movements and habitat selection of the species immediately following the breeding season.Five Chorus Frogs were tagged with approximately 50 μc Co60 , and were released at a common point near a forest grassland interface. Study frogs were then located at two hour intervals for several 24-hour or 48-hour periods by searching the area of previous contact with a portable survey meter equipped with a scintillation probe.Horizontal movements are apparently random in direction and not influenced by habitat or meteorologic conditions other than moisture. They occur during daylight hours and at night and seem only to be influenced by moisture conditions of the microhabitat.Vertical movements are also influenced by moisture conditions, and occur primarily just before and after dawn.Chorus Frog preference for either a grassland or forest habitat was not determined by this study.Ball State UniversityMuncie, IN 47306