The purpose of this quantitative correlational study was to examine the relationship between student perceptions of classroom climate and student growth in high-poverty schools. More specifically, this study analyzed the relationship between Tripod Student Perception Survey classroom favorability ratings and Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System (TVAAS) gain scores for students in grades 3 through 8 in a medium-sized school district in Northeast Tennessee during the 2012-2013 academic year. The data were gathered from approximately 1,500 fourth and fifth grade students from 6 elementary schools and 2 K-8 schools as well as approximately 1,300 sixth, seventh, and eighth grade students from 3 middle schools and 2 K-8 schools. The analysis of data found statistically significant relationships between student perceptions of caring and reading TVAAS gain scores among students in grades 4 and 5, student perceptions of conferring and math TVAAS gain scores among students in grades 4 and 5, as well as student perceptions of captivating and math TVAAS gain scores among students in grades 4 through 8. The study did not reveal statistically significant relationships between student perceptions of challenging, clarifying, consolidating, or controlling and reading or math TVAAS gain scores.

Presenters will demonstrate concrete examples and supporting research regarding professor presence within online courses. Additionally, the presentation will address the skill of transforming this content into practice, valuable practical applications, the importance of professor presence in the online classroom, and why such presence is important in building a learning community in the online environment. The presentation is appropriate for all instructors of blended and exclusively online environments.

The phenomenon of transfer—our ability to perform novel tasks by generalizing from past experiences—has long captivated theorists and practitioners. As educators it is essential for us to understand what types of learning best promote transfer and to structure our curricula accordingly. With that goal in mind, this dissertation outlines two lines of research. For the first line of research I adopted an experimental approach in the domain of problem solving, examining a training technique whereby the learner solves practice problems for the same principle in dissimilar contexts as opposed to highly similar contexts. The key finding was that contextual variability improved transfer outcomes when a set of training problems were solved spaced in time (akin to a closed-book test), but not when prior training problems and their solutions remained visible throughout training (akin to an open-book test). This finding suggests that contextual variability during training can be beneficial because it forces the learner to more effortfully recall what they have learned in the past. For the second line of research I then adopted a correlational approach, investigating a ubiquitous self-report inventory, the Study Process Questionnaire (SPQ), which is meant to quantify student learning approaches to predict educational outcomes. However, the SPQ’s predictive validity has recently been challenged because deep learning and its corresponding outcomes remain poorly defined. To tackle this measurement issue, my colleagues and I operationally defined outcome measures in real university courses to tap more precisely into transfer of learning. Across several studies we found limited evidence for the SPQ’s ability to predict transfer outcomes, leading us to suggest that educators and researchers should be more cautious about using this self-report inventory to characterize student learning. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / A central goal of education is to equip students with ‘flexible’ knowledge, enabling them to transfer the far-reaching principles they have learned to solve new, real-world problems. But what conditions of training are most conducive to transfer? One understudied technique involves being tested on the same principle in dissimilar contexts. The experiments reported in Chapter 2 provide evidence for this training technique in the domain of problem solving. Aside from direct interventions, another approach has been to measure individual differences among students to predict how much they engage in “deep learning”—a process closely associated with transfer. However, four correlational studies in Chapters 3 and 4 revealed little support for this approach, highlighting the difficulty of characterizing learning strategies using self-reports. In sum, this shows promise for interventions involving repeated testing in dissimilar contexts, but little promise for a self-report inventory meant to capture individual differences in student learning.

Yes / Lillis (2001: 53) calls referencing an ‘institutional practice of mystery’, a frequent cause of student anxiety and complaint. It is an area in which a vast perceptional gulf exists between academics and students, one in which academic support staff can see both sides. Students, not wanting to look ‘stupid’ in front of academic staff, will often express their concerns only to librarians and other support staff, so academics do not see the full range of anxieties. This paper reflects on this problem and reports on a successful project to alleviate student fears by decreasing the number of official referencing styles at the University of Bradford.

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship among student civic knowledge scores and several different variables each at the student, classroom/school, and national levels using the IEA CIVED study international data set collected in 1999 from 27 countries. The student level predictors included two elements of socioeconomic status (a student's parental education, their home literacy level measured by the number of books at home), student's perception of an open classroom climate, student aspiration of obtaining higher education, and other variables that were identified as relevant to the dependent variable in the literature. The classroom/school level predictors included teacher's degree in civics, in-service training, teaching confidence, and school safety in addition to the compositional variable created as the classroom/school averages by aggregating the student level variables. Then I investigated whether instructional methods focusing on the student activities the teacher employed in the classroom and an open classroom climate were associated after accounting for the above student and school level background variables. National level variables such as GNP, GINI index, democratic system, public education expenditure, and etc. as well as compositional variables obtained by aggregating the classroom/school variables were also added to the model to investigate if they were associated with students' civic knowledge scores and whether they could explain between nations variability. The study used a three-level hierarchical linear model to analyze the data, with number of students, N=56,579, number of classrooms/schools, J=3443, and number of countries, K=27. Some of the key findings was that there were significant variations of civics knowledge among nations, and significant variations of civic knowledge scores between school and within nations, no statistically significant association between teacher's practice and civics knowledge scores, however the student perception of an open classroom climate was significant at all 3 levels. These findings were interpreted in terms of policies and practices that could be implemented to improve students' civic knowledge. / Ph. D.

Doctor of Education / Curriculum and Instruction Programs / Rosemary S. Talab / The purpose of this case study was to explore Teaching Presence in the undergraduate online Business course environment. This study explored the following three Research Questions: 1. How do undergraduate Business students perceive Teaching Presence in online courses? 2. What Teaching Presence components do undergraduate Business students find valuable in online courses? 3. How do exemplary undergraduate online Business course faculty demonstrate Teaching Presence in online instruction? The population of this study consisted of 20 undergraduate Business students and 3 student-nominated Business faculty. Participants included Business students enrolled in online Business courses. Based on the student interviews, the faculty most often nominated by the students as demonstrating effective methods of Teaching Presence in online Business courses served as faculty participants. Interviews of students and faculty were conducted during the Fall 2015 semester. There were 101 units identified for Research Question 1, with 46 units for the theme of "Direct Instruction", 36 for the theme of "Discourse Facilitation", and 19 units for the theme of "Design and Organization". The major findings from these research questions were that undergraduate Business students perceived online course Teaching Presence most through Direct Instruction. Students perceived prompting student engagement in discussions and encouraging student participation as important elements of the "Discourse Facilitation" theme. Students perceived good course design methods as being important to Teaching Presence. There were 245 units identified for Research Question 2, with 93 units for the theme of "Design and Organization", 88 units for "Discourse Facilitation" and 64 units for Direct Instruction". The major findings were that the "Design and Organization" theme was found to be most valuable to undergraduate Business students in the form of designing methods and establishing time parameters. Setting a climate for learning within the "Discourse Facilitation" theme and confirming understanding within the "Direct Instruction" themes were important to students when discussing what Teaching Presence components they found valuable in online Business courses. There were 81 units identified for Research Question 3, which consisted of faculty interviews focused on how exemplary online Business course faculty demonstrated Teaching Presence. The themes that were found in the faculty interviews were 30 units for the "Design and Organization" theme, 26 units for the "Discourse Facilitation" theme and 25 units for the "Direct Instruction" theme. The major findings were that the "Design and Organization" theme was found to be of the utmost importance to exemplary faculty when discussing the demonstration of Teaching Presence in online Business courses. Within the "Discourse Facilitation" theme, faculty emphasized the importance of drawing in participants and prompting discussion. Confirming understanding was found to be the most important aspect of the "Direct Instruction" theme. Recommendations for the research setting were in the areas of learning activity clarity, the use of integrated video lectures, enriched student-instructor interaction strategies, and technological tools to identify student comprehension struggles. Recommendations for future research including a study of Teaching Presence in different academic disciplines and in different academic environments, the efficacy of various technologies in enhancing Teaching Presence, and instructor attributes influencing Teaching Presence.

The clinical learning environment (CLE) provides students with an opportunity to build confidence and competence in the provision of patient care (Benner, 2010). The aim of this qualitative descriptive research was to explore and describe student perceptions of developing confidence through their clinical learning experiences, discovering what features of the CLE support their learning and the development of confidence. Ten students were recruited through purposive sampling and participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. Self-efficacy theory (Bandura, 1997) was used as a theoretical framework to guide this research and for the interpretation of the content analysis. The analysis revealed five socio-structural themes that support student learning and development of confidence. These findings elaborate Bandura’s (1997) theory. The most influential, through verbal persuasion was the clinical nursing instructor (CNI) followed by self, the buddy nurse, peers, and the staff/unit environment. Students perceived their development of confidence through a bi-directional interaction between their cognitive/affective processes, behaviour and the CLE. Understanding student perceptions of their confidence development, signals the need for informed pedagogical strategies to support student learning and development of confidence. / October 2016

This study examines middle school students' perceptions of a future career in a science, math, engineering, or technology (STEM) career field. Gender, grade, predispositions to STEM contents, and learner dispositions are examined for changing perceptions and development in career-related choice behavior. Student perceptions as measured by validated measurement instruments are analyzed pre and post participation in a STEM intervention energy-monitoring program that was offered in several U.S. middle schools during the 2009-2010, 2010-2011 school years. A multiple linear regression (MLR) model, developed by incorporating predictors identified by an examination of the literature and a hypothesis-generating pilot study for prediction of STEM career interest, is introduced. Theories on the career choice development process from authors such as Ginzberg, Eccles, and Lent are examined as the basis for recognition of career concept development among students. Multiple linear regression statistics, correlation analysis, and analyses of means are used to examine student data from two separate program years. Study research questions focus on predictive ability, RSQ, of MLR models by gender/grade, and significance of model predictors in order to determine the most significant predictors of STEM career interest, and changes in students' perceptions pre and post program participation. Analysis revealed increases in the perceptions of a science career, decreases in perceptions of a STEM career, increase of the significance of science and mathematics to predictive models, and significant increases in students' perceptions of creative tendencies.

Prescribing medicines is the primary intervention that most doctors offer to influence their patients’ health; however concerns have been expressed about the extent to which graduates are prepared by medical schools to assume prescribing responsibility. Both students and clinical teachers have identified a gap between workplace prescribing demands placed on newly qualified doctors and their preparation for this complex activity during undergraduate training. This study explored the exit-level prescribing performance of final-year students in the Graduate Entry Medical Programme at the University of the Witwatersrand compared with students’ perceptions of their prescribing competence. The results indicated a disparity between students’ competence and confidence. Examination marks showed that 83.6% of students were competent to prescribe according to the graduating standards of the University; however, questionnaire data revealed that 66% of students did not feel that their training had enabled them to prescribe rationally. This inconsistency was explored by analysis of the examination papers according to Bloom’s Revised and the SOLO Taxonomies. It was concluded that students score well on questions which test recall and application of knowledge, but some do not manage questions involving evaluation. Since prescribing is a complex skill that requires evaluative competence, this may explain why, despite high examination scores, students remain insecure. Exploration of the structure of knowledge through a Bernsteinian lens revealed that curricular components including problem-based learning and horizontal integration constrain epistemic access to the structure of rational prescribing knowledge for some students. It is recommended that rational prescribing skills should be taught as a synchronous strand within the curriculum, rather than in the current integrated mode. Learning could also be improved by innovative pedagogies associated with active learning and improved feedback.

Over the last 50 years, research has explored the writing assignment types and purposes found in undergraduate courses, including discipline-specific writing for the business major, which is one of the most popular fields of study for international students in the U.S. Many studies have explored faculty perceptions of writing challenges students exhibit when writing for business; however, few studies have compared both faculty and student perceptions of student writing challenges. The purpose of this study was to investigate business faculty perceptions of the writing challenges exhibited by students for whom English is a second or additional language (EAL) compared to EAL perceptions of their own writing challenges. This study utilized parallel surveys distributed to faculty and students in Accounting, Finance, and Management in one undergraduate business school. Students self-selected as being a native English speaker (NES), an EAL, or having more than one primary language (multilingual or ML). Results of the study indicated statistically significant differences across faculty, EAL, and ML perceptions of developing arguments as an important purpose of business writing. No statistically significant differences were found, however, across all three populations in regards to perceptions of the student challenges of business writing.