La présente recherche s’inscrit au plan scientifique dans la réflexion contemporaine menée sur l’élève lecteur et ses modes d’appropriation et de reconfiguration du texte lu. L’objet de ce travail est de mettre en évidence les problèmes spécifiques à la réception du personnage en liant étroitement pédagogie de la lecture littéraire et compétences culturelles, affectives et sociales requises et développées chez le lecteur dans le contexte scolaire tunisien. Notre interrogation principale consiste à nous demander si les modes d’approche du texte axés sur un rapport d’identification au personnage favorisent la motivation à la lecture et contribuent par là même à l’élaboration du sens et à la construction identitaire des jeunes lecteurs. Les investigations menées sont centrées sur deux sujets privilégiés : le statut du personnage romanesque dans le contexte pré-universitaire et son rôle dans l’appropriation du phénomène littéraire au lycée. L’objectif étant d’illustrer comment les différentes émotions peuvent devenir d’importants alliés dans la construction du sens.Une fois posés le cadre conceptuel de la recherche relative au personnage et l’état des lieux des savoirs sur la réception des lycéens, la réflexion se développe à partir de l’exemple de la lecture de la trilogie de Yasmina Khadra. Il s’agit d’un exemple à partir duquel nous proposons des perspectives didactiques pour la construction d’une façon de lire, à la fois participative et analytique / This scientific research is part of contemporary thinking on the student-led drive and its modes of appropriation and reconfiguration of the text. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the specific problems at the reception of the character by closely linking teaching of reading literary and cultural skills, as well as emotional and social skills required and developed at the level of the reader in the Tunisian school context. Our main question is to ask whether the ways of approaching a text-based report identifying the character promote reading motivation and thus contribute to the development ofmeaning and identity construction of young readers. The investigations focus on two main issues: the status of the fictional character in the pre-university context and its role in the appropriation of the literary phenomenon in high school. The objective is to illustrate how different emotions can become important components in the construction of meaning.Once laid the conceptual framework of research on the character and the inventory of knowledge on the reception of students, thinking will develop from the example of reading the trilogy by Yasmina Khadra. This is an example from which we offer didactic opportunities to build a way of reading, both analytical and participatory

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:06:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 MariaGS_DISSERT.pdf: 3445366 bytes, checksum: 68440e4fb7bb00bea09b12ac4797d669 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-01-29 / The construction of a mapping of the practices of reading and writing printed and digital texts, declared by graduating students from the Bachelor s degree in Science and Technology (BCT), has provided us the analysis of the course they are making in such a socio-historical moment characterized by the revolution of the post-paper. In this sense, the general objective of this research is to understand how that construction works under the point of view of those graduating students. For this, our reflection has been guided by the search of answers for some questions which have presented to us: what reading and writing conceptions BCT graduating students have; what reading and writing practices those collaborators develop; what collections they declare to have access to; what differences they declare to have between printed and digital reading and writing along the different social roles they develop; what the reader/writer identity relations of those collaborators are. To achieving the plausible answers, we have gathered a corpus composed by texts of three genres of the argument order: academic profiles (or self-portrait), opinion articles and argumentative letters. Besides, we have made semi-structured interviews and questionnaires in the online tool of the Google Docs. The methodology which supports this academic work is the qualitative research (SIGNORINI; CAVALCANTI, 1998)of ethnographic direction (THOMAS, 1993; ANDR?, 1995) in Applied Linguistics (CELANI, 2000; MOITA-LOPES, 2006) and the theoretical contribution comes from the bakhtinian perspective of language conception (BAKHTIN [1929] 1981); the socio-historical writing construction (L?VY, 1996; CHARTIER, R., 1998, 2002, 2007; COSCARELLI, 2006; CHARTIER, A., 2007; ARA?JO, 2007; COSCARELLI; RIBEIRO, 2007; XAVIER, 2009; MARCUSCHI; XAVIER, 2010); from the studies of the pedagogy of the writing (GIROUX, 1997); from the literacy studies understood as sociocultural practice, plural and situated (TFOUNI, 1988; KLEIMAN, 1995; TINOCO, 2003, 2008; OLIVEIRA; KLEIMAN, 2008), from the studies about identity in postmodernity (HALL, 2003; BAUMAN, 2005). The results of the analysis have pointed at a multiplicity of reading/writing practices of printed and digital texts developed by the BCT graduating students due to the coexistence of the modality printed and that one derived from the new mobile devices. In that multiplicity, the prevalent idea of the collaborators is that there is a continuum between printed texts and digital texts (not a dichotomy), since the option of reading/writing printed texts or digital ones is always linked to specific communication situations, which involve participants, objectives, strategies, values, (dis)advantages, besides (re)creation of discursive genres in function of the mobile devices to which those collaborators have access in the different spheres of activities that they participate. All of that has caused a deep intersection in the identity traces of college students readers/writers in the 21st century which cannot be ignored by academic formation / A constru??o de um mapeamento das pr?ticas de ler e escrever textos impressos e digitais, declaradas por graduandos do Bacharelado em Ci?ncias e Tecnologia (BCT), propiciou-nos a an?lise do percurso que eles est?o fazendo em um momento s?cio-hist?rico caracterizado pela revolu??o do p?s-papel. Nesse sentido, o objetivo geral desta pesquisa ? compreender como se d? essa constru??o sob o ponto de vista desses graduandos. Para tanto, norteou nossa reflex?o a busca por respostas a algumas quest?es que se nos apresentaram: 1) quais as concep??es de leitura e escrita dos graduandos do BCT; 2) quais as pr?ticas de leitura e escrita que esses colaboradores desenvolvem; 3) quais os acervos (digital, impresso ou ambos) a que eles declaram ter acesso; 4) que diferen?as eles declaram existir entre a leitura e a escrita impressa e a digital no exerc?cio dos diferentes pap?is sociais que desenvolvem; 5) quais as rela??es identit?rias de leitor/escrevente desses colaboradores. Para chegarmos a respostas plaus?veis, reunimos um corpus constitu?do de textos de tr?s g?neros da ordem do argumentar: perfis acad?micos (ou autorretratos), artigos de opini?o e cartas argumentativas. Al?m disso, realizamos entrevista semiestruturada e question?rio na ferramenta online do Google Docs. A metodologia que sustentou este trabalho acad?mico ? a de pesquisa qualitativa (SIGNORINI; CAVALCANTI, 1998) de vertente etnogr?fica (THOMAS, 1993; ANDR?, 1995) em Lingu?stica Aplicada (CELANI, 2000; MOITA-LOPES, 2006) e o aporte te?rico vem da concep??o de l?ngua(gem) de perspectiva bakhtiniana (BAKHTIN [1929] 1981); da constru??o s?cio-hist?rica da escrita (L?VY, 1996; CHARTIER, R., 1998, 2002, 2007; COSCARELLI, 2006; CHARTIER, A., 2007; ARA?JO, 2007; COSCARELLI; RIBEIRO, 2007; XAVIER, 2009; MARCUSCHI; XAVIER, 2010); dos estudos da pedagogia da escrita (GIROUX, 1997); dos estudos do letramento entendido como pr?tica sociocultural, plural e situada (TFOUNI, 1988; KLEIMAN, 1995; TINOCO, 2003, 2008; OLIVEIRA; KLEIMAN, 2008), dos estudos sobre identidade na p?s-modernidade (HALL, 2003; BAUMAN, 2005). Os resultados da an?lise empreendida apontam-nos para uma multiplicidade de pr?ticas de leitura/escrita de textos impressos e digitais desenvolvidas por graduandos do BCT devido ? coexist?ncia da modalidade impressa e da que decorre dos novos dispositivos m?veis. Nessa multiplicidade, a ideia que prevalece do ponto de vista desses colaboradores ? a de um continuum entre textos impressos e textos digitais (n?o uma dicotomia), uma vez que a op??o por ler/escrever textos impressos ou textos digitais est? sempre atrelada a situa??es de comunica??o espec?ficas, que envolvem participantes, objetivos, estrat?gias, valores, (des)vantagens, al?m da (re)cria??o de g?neros discursivos em fun??o dos dispositivos m?veis a que esses colaboradores t?m acesso nas diferentes esferas de atividade de que participam. Tudo isso tem ocasionado uma profunda intersec??o nos tra?os de identidade de leitores/escreventes universit?rios do s?culo XXI que n?o pode ser ignorada pela forma??o acad?mica